in force 2011-06-01
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Amended by Regulation (EU) No 513/2011 32011R0513
Regulation (EU) No 513/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies Text with EEA relevance
detected 2026-08-13
75 provisions touched — 75 substantive, 0 date-only, 66 disputed · 26 changes without an explanation
Emendrix checks every change against three independent sources. Where they disagree it says so rather than picking a winner.
MODIFIED +656 −8 Art. 3 Definitions§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The list of definitions in Article 3(1) gains three new points after point (o): a definition of competent authorities as the authorities designated by each Member State under Article 22, a definition of sectoral legislation referring to the legal acts of the Union mentioned in the first subparagraph of Article 4(1), and a definition of sectoral competent authorities describing national authorities designated under relevant sectoral legislation for supervising credit institutions, investment firms, insurance, assurance and reinsurance undertakings, UCITS, occupational retirement institutions and alternative investment funds.
The prior version of Article 3(1) ended with point (o) on credit rating activities and contained no such points (p) through (r).
Cited: Art. 3, v2 · Art. 3, v1
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 3
Definitions
1. For the purpose of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) credit rating means an opinion regarding the creditworthiness of an entity, a debt or financial obligation, debt security, preferred share or other financial instrument, or of an … 494 unchanged words … or persons who effectively direct the business of the credit rating agency and the member or members of its administrative or supervisory board;
(o) credit rating activities means data and information analysis and the evaluation, approval, issuing and review of credit ratings. ratings;
(p) competent authorities means the authorities designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 22;
(q) sectoral legislation means the legal acts of the Union referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(1);
(r) sectoral competent authorities means the national competent authorities designated under the relevant sectoral legislation for the supervision of credit institutions, investment firms, insurance undertakings, assurance undertakings, reinsurance undertakings, undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS), institutions for occupational retirement provision and alternative investment funds.
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1(a), the following shall not be considered to be credit ratings:
(a) recommendations within the meaning of Article 1(3) of Commission Directive 2003/125/ECOJ L 339, 24.12.2003, p. 73.;
(b) investment research as defined in Article 24(1) of Directive 2006/73/ECCommission Directive 2006/73/EC of 10 August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive (OJ L 241, 2.9.2006, p. 26). and other forms of general recommendation, such as buy, sell or hold, relating to transactions in financial instruments or to financial obligations; or
(c) opinions about the value of a financial instrument or a financial obligation.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 3.1§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +607 −609 Art. 4 Use of credit ratings§
applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)
dates added to the text: 2009-07-13
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
Article 4(1) now refers to UCITS as defined under Directive 2009/65/EC rather than Directive 85/611/EEC, and adds alternative investment funds to the list of entities that may use credit ratings for regulatory purposes only if issued by registered credit rating agencies established in the Union.
In Article 4(3)(1)(b), (c), (d) and (h), the references to the competent authority of the home Member State, and to the college of competent authorities referred to in Article 29, are replaced with references to ESMA, and the sub-points (i) and (ii) under point (h) likewise substitute ESMA and the relevant supervisory authority of the third-country credit rating agency for the previously named competent authorities.
Cited: Art. 4, v1 · Art. 4, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 4
Use of credit ratings
1. Credit institutions as defined in Directive 2006/48/EC, investments investment firms as defined in Directive 2004/39/EC, insurance undertakings subject to the First Council Directive 73/239/EEC of 24 July 1973 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking-up and pursuit of the business of direct insurance other than life assuranceOJ L 228, 16.8.1973, p. 3., assurance undertakings as defined in Directive 2002/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 concerning life assuranceOJ L 345, 19.12.2002, p. 1., reinsurance undertakings as defined in Directive 2005/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2005 on reinsuranceOJ L 323, 9.12.2005, p. 1., UCITS as defined in Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) as defined in Directive 85/611/EEC and (UCITS)OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 32., institutions for occupational retirement provision as defined in Directive 2003/41/EC and alternative investment funds may use credit ratings for regulatory purposes only if they are issued by credit rating agencies established in the Community Union and registered in accordance with this Regulation.
Where a prospectus published under Directive 2003/71/EC and Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 contains a reference to a credit rating or credit ratings, the issuer, offeror, or person asking for admission to trading on a regulated market shall ensure that the prospectus also includes clear and prominent information stating whether or not such credit ratings are issued by a credit rating agency established in the Community and registered under this Regulation.
2. A credit rating agency established in the Community and registered in accordance with this Regulation shall be deemed to have issued a credit rating when the credit rating has been published on the credit rating agency’s website or by other means or distributed by subscription and presented and disclosed in accordance with the obligations of Article 10, clearly identifying that the credit rating is endorsed in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article.
3. A credit rating agency established in the Community and registered in accordance with this Regulation may endorse a credit rating issued in a third country only when credit rating activities resulting in the issuing of such a credit rating comply with the following conditions:
(a) the credit rating activities resulting in the issuing of the credit rating to be endorsed are undertaken in whole or in part by the endorsing credit rating agency or by credit rating agencies belonging to the same group;
(b) the credit rating agency has verified and is able to demonstrate on an ongoing basis to the competent authority European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the home Member State European Parliament and of the CouncilOJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84. (ESMA), that the conduct of credit rating activities by the third-country credit rating agency resulting in the issuing of the credit rating to be endorsed fulfils requirements which are at least as stringent as the requirements set out in Articles 6 to 12;
(c) the ability of the competent authority of the home Member State of the endorsing credit rating agency or the college of competent authorities referred to in Article 29 (college) ESMA to assess and monitor the compliance of the credit rating agency established in the third country with the requirements referred to in point (b) is not limited;
(d) the credit rating agency makes available on request to the competent authority of the home Member State ESMA all the information necessary to enable that competent authority ESMA to supervise on an ongoing basis the compliance with the requirements of this Regulation;
(e) there is an objective reason for the credit rating to be elaborated in a third country;
(f) the credit rating agency established in the third country is authorised or registered, and is subject to supervision, in that third country;
(g) the regulatory regime in that third country prevents interference by the competent authorities and other public authorities of that third country with the content of credit ratings and methodologies; and
(h) there is an appropriate cooperation arrangement between the competent authority of the home Member State of the endorsing credit rating agency ESMA and the relevant competent supervisory authority of the credit rating agency established in a third country. The competent authority of the home Member State ESMA shall ensure that such a cooperation arrangements arrangement shall specify at least:
(i) the mechanism for the exchange of information between ESMA and the competent authorities concerned; relevant supervisory authority of the credit rating agency established in a third country; and
(ii) the procedures concerning the coordination of supervisory activities in order to enable the competent authority of the home Member State of the endorsing credit rating agency ESMA to monitor credit rating activities resulting in the issuing of the endorsed credit rating on an ongoing basis.
4. A credit rating endorsed in accordance with paragraph 3 shall be considered to be a credit rating issued by a credit rating agency established in the Community and registered in accordance with this Regulation.
A credit rating agency established in the Community and registered in accordance with this Regulation shall not use such endorsement with the intention of avoiding the requirements of this Regulation.
5. The credit rating agency that has endorsed a credit rating issued in a third country in accordance with paragraph 3 shall remain fully responsible for such a credit rating and for the fulfilment of conditions set out therein.
6. Where the Commission has recognised, in accordance with Article 5(6), the legal and supervisory framework of a third country as equivalent to the requirements of this Regulation and the cooperation arrangements referred to in Article 5(7) are operational, the credit rating agency endorsing credit ratings issued in that third country shall no longer be required to verify or demonstrate that the condition laid down in paragraph 3(g) of this Article is fulfilled.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 4.1§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 4.3§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +620 −1,724 Art. 5 Equivalence and certification based on equivalence§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The certification application process no longer routes through CESR and the college-of-competent-authorities procedure with CESR publishing lists and facilitators being selected; instead the application is submitted to and examined and decided upon by ESMA directly.
The exemption provisions in paragraph 4 now specify the application must be submitted together with the certification application and refer to ESMA as the body assessing and granting the exemption, rather than the competent authority, and the physical presence exemption refers to the Union instead of the Community.
Paragraph 6's rulemaking mechanism now describes the Commission specifying or amending the equivalence criteria through delegated acts under Articles 38a to 38c rather than the regulatory procedure with scrutiny under Article 38(2), paragraph 7 now has ESMA rather than the facilitator establishing cooperation agreements with third-country supervisory authorities, and paragraph 8 drops the reference to Article 25 alongside Articles 20 and 24.
Cited: Art. 5, v1 · Art. 5, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 5
Equivalence and certification based on equivalence
1. The credit ratings that are related to entities established or financial instruments issued in third countries and that are issued by a credit rating agency established in a third country may be used in the Community under Article 4(1) without being endorsed in accordance with Article 4(3), provided that:
(a) the credit rating agency is authorised or registered in and is subject to supervision in that third country;
(b) the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article, recognising the legal and supervisory framework of that third country as equivalent to the requirements of this Regulation;
(c) the cooperation arrangements referred to in paragraph 7 of this Article are operational;
(d) the credit ratings issued by the credit rating agency and its credit rating activities are not of systemic importance to the financial stability or integrity of the financial markets of one or more Member States; and
(e) the credit rating agency is certified in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article.
2. The credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1 may apply for certification. The application shall be submitted to the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) ESMA in accordance with the relevant provisions of Article 15. Within five working days of receipt of 3.
ESMA shall examine and decide on the application for certification, CESR shall send the application to the competent authorities of all Member States, inviting them to consider becoming a member of the relevant college in accordance with Article 29(3)(b). The competent authorities that have decided to become members of the college shall notify CESR accordingly within 10 working days of receipt of CESR’s invitation. The competent authorities that notify CESR in accordance with this paragraph shall be members of the college. Within twenty working days of receipt of the application for certification, CESR shall draw up and publish on its website a list of the competent authorities that are members of the college. Within 10 working days of the publication, the members of the college shall select a facilitator in accordance with criteria in Article 29(5). Following the establishment of the college, its composition and functioning shall be governed by Article 29.
3. The application for certification shall be examined in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 16. The certification decision shall be based on the criteria set out in points (a) to (d) of paragraph 1 of this Article.
The certification decision shall be notified and published in accordance with Article 18.
4. The credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1 may also separately apply to be exempted:
(a) on a case-by-case basis from complying with some or all of the requirements set out in Section A of Annex I and Article 7(4) if the credit rating agency is able to demonstrate that the requirements are not proportionate in view of the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its issuing of credit ratings;
(b) from the requirement of physical presence in the Community Union where such a requirement would be too burdensome and disproportionate in view of the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its issuing of credit ratings.
An application for an exemption under point (a) or (b) of the first subparagraph shall be submitted by the credit rating agency together with the application for certification. When assessing that such an application, the competent authorities ESMA shall take into consideration the size of the applicant credit rating agency, agency referred to in paragraph 1, having regard to the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its issuing of credit ratings, as well as the impact of the credit ratings issued by the credit rating agency on the financial stability and integrity of the financial markets of one or more Member States. On the basis of those considerations, the competent authority ESMA may grant such exemption to the credit rating agency. agency referred to in paragraph 1.
5. The decisions on the exemptions under paragraph 4 of this Article shall be subject to the relevant provisions and procedures set out in Article 16 with the exception of the second subparagraph of paragraph 7 of that Article. In the event of continued absence of agreement among the members of the relevant college on whether to grant an exemption to the credit rating agency, the facilitator shall adopt a fully reasoned decision.
For the purposes of certification, including the granting of exemptions, and supervision, the facilitator shall perform the tasks of the competent authority of the home Member State where relevant.
6. The Commission may adopt an equivalence decision in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 38(3), stating that the legal and supervisory framework of a third country ensures that credit rating agencies authorised or registered in that third country comply with legally binding requirements which are equivalent to the requirements resulting from this Regulation and which are subject to effective supervision and enforcement in that third country.
A third-country legal and supervisory framework may be considered equivalent to this Regulation if that framework fulfils at least the following conditions:
(a) credit rating agencies in that third country are subject to authorisation or registration and are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis;
(b) credit rating agencies in that third country are subject to legally binding rules which are equivalent to those set out in Articles 6 to 12 and Annex I; and
(c) the regulatory regime in that third country prevents interference by the supervisory authorities and other public authorities of that third country with the content of credit ratings and methodologies.
The In order to take account of developments on financial markets, the Commission shall adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a, and subject to the conditions of Articles 38b and 38c, measures to specify further or amend the criteria set out in points (a) to (a), (b) and (c) of the second subparagraph in order to take account of developments on financial markets. Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 38(2). paragraph.
7. The facilitator ESMA shall establish cooperation agreements with the relevant competent supervisory authorities of third countries whose legal and supervisory frameworks have been considered equivalent to this Regulation in accordance with paragraph 6. Such arrangements shall specify at least:
(a) the mechanism for the exchange of information between ESMA and the competent relevant supervisory authorities of the third countries concerned; and
(b) the procedures concerning the coordination of supervisory activities.
CESR shall coordinate the development of cooperation agreements between the competent authorities of Member States and the relevant competent authorities of third countries whose legal and supervisory frameworks have been considered equivalent to this Regulation in accordance with paragraph 6.
8. Articles 20, 20 and 24 and 25 shall apply mutatis mutandis to certified credit rating agencies and to credit ratings issued by them.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 5.2§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 5.3§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 5.4§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 5.5§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 5.6§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 5.7§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 5.8§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +8 −69 Art. 6 Independence and avoidance of conflicts of interest§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
In the first sentence of Article 6(3), the actor empowered to exempt a credit rating agency from certain requirements changes from the competent authority of the home Member State to ESMA.
Correspondingly, the sentence on ensuring that at least one credit rating agency in a group is not exempted now names ESMA as the actor performing that role instead of competent authorities.
Cited: Art. 6, v1 · Art. 6, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 6
Independence and avoidance of conflicts of interest
1. A credit rating agency shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the issuing of a credit rating is not affected by any existing or potential conflict of interest or business relationship involving the credit rating agency issuing the credit rating, its managers, rating analysts, employees, any other natural person whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of the credit rating agency, or any person directly or indirectly linked to it by control.
2. In order to ensure compliance with paragraph 1, a credit rating agency shall comply with the requirements set out in Sections A and B of Annex I.
3. At the request of a credit rating agency, the competent authority of the home Member State ESMA may exempt a credit rating agency from complying with the requirements of points 2, 5 and 6 of Section A of Annex I and Article 7(4) if the credit rating agency is able to demonstrate that those requirements are not proportionate in view of the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of issue of credit ratings and that:
(a) the credit rating agency has fewer than 50 employees;
(b) the credit rating agency has implemented measures and procedures, in particular internal control mechanisms, reporting arrangements and measures ensuring independence of rating analysts and persons approving credit ratings, which ensure the effective compliance with the objectives of this Regulation; and
(c) the size of the credit rating agency is not determined in such a way as to avoid compliance with the requirements of this Regulation by a credit rating agency or a group of credit rating agencies.
In the case of a group of credit rating agencies, competent authorities ESMA shall ensure that at least one of the credit rating agencies in the group is not exempted from complying with the requirements of points 2, 5 and 6 of Section A of Annex I and Article 7(4).
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 6.3§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +20 −41 Art. 9 Outsourcing§
applies from: unchanged
The provision now refers to ESMA as the body whose ability to supervise compliance must not be materially impaired, replacing the earlier reference to competent authorities.
Cited: Art. 9, v1 · Art. 9, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 9
Outsourcing
Outsourcing of important operational functions shall not be undertaken in such a way as to impair materially the quality of the credit rating agency’s agency's internal control and the ability of the competent authorities ESMA to supervise the credit rating agency’s agency's compliance with obligations under this Regulation.
MODIFIED +28 −4 Art. 10 Disclosure and presentation of credit ratings§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
In paragraph 6, the restriction on using an authority's name to indicate or suggest endorsement or approval, which previously named only a competent authority, now also names ESMA alongside any competent authority in both places that phrase appears.
Cited: Art. 10, v1 · Art. 10, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 10
Disclosure and presentation of credit ratings
1. A credit rating agency shall disclose any credit rating, as well as any decision to discontinue a credit rating, on a non-selective basis and in a timely manner. In the event of a decision to discontinue a credit rating, the information disclosed shall include full reasons for the decision.
The first subparagraph shall also apply to credit ratings that are distributed by subscription.
2. Credit rating agencies shall ensure that credit ratings are presented and processed in accordance with the requirements set out in Section D of Annex I.
3. When a credit rating agency issues credit ratings for structured finance instruments, it shall ensure that rating categories that are attributed to structured finance instruments are clearly differentiated using an additional symbol which distinguishes them from rating categories used for any other entities, financial instruments or financial obligations.
4. A credit rating agency shall disclose its policies and procedures regarding unsolicited credit ratings.
5. When a credit rating agency issues an unsolicited credit rating, it shall state prominently in the credit rating whether or not the rated entity or related third party participated in the credit rating process and whether the credit rating agency had access to the accounts and other relevant internal documents of the rated entity or a related third party.
Unsolicited credit ratings shall be identified as such.
6. A credit rating agency shall not use the name of ESMA or any competent authority in such a way that would indicate or suggest endorsement or approval by that ESMA or any competent authority of the credit ratings or any credit rating activities of the credit rating agency.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 10.6§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +42 −202 Art. 11 General and periodic disclosures§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
References to CESR in the provisions on the central repository and the standard reporting form have been replaced with references to ESMA.
The obligation on a credit rating agency to provide annual information under point 2 of Part II of Section E of Annex I now specifies a deadline of 31 March and directs that information to ESMA, whereas the earlier text sent it to the competent authority of the home Member State and to CESR without a stated deadline, and the earlier text's requirement that the home Member State authority disclose that information to the members of the relevant college no longer appears.
Cited: Art. 11, v1 · Art. 11, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 11
General and periodic disclosures
1. A credit rating agency shall fully disclose to the public and update immediately information relating to the matters set out in Part I of Section E of Annex I.
2. A credit rating agency shall make available in a central repository established by CESR ESMA information on its historical performance data including the ratings transition frequency and information about credit ratings issued in the past and on their changes. A credit rating agency shall provide information to that repository on a standard form as provided for by CESR. CESR ESMA. ESMA shall make that information accessible to the public and shall publish summary information on the main developments observed on an annual basis.
3. A credit rating agency shall provide annually annually, by 31 March, to the competent authority of its home Member State and to CESR ESMA information relating to matters set out in point 2 of Part II of Section E of Annex I. The competent authority of the home Member State shall disclose that information to the members of the relevant college.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 11.2§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 11.3§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +93 −285 Art. 14 Requirement for registration§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The territorial reference for effectiveness of registration changed from the Community to the Union, and the actor issuing the registration decision changed from the competent authority of the home Member State to ESMA, with the cross-references updated from Article 16(7)/17(7) to Article 16(3)/17(3).
The notification duty for material changes to the conditions for initial registration now names ESMA alone as recipient, removing the earlier references to CESR and the facilitator, and the territory mentioned changed from the Community to the Union.
The registering authority named in paragraph 4 and the authority barred from imposing extra registration requirements in paragraph 5 both changed from the competent authority of the home Member State to ESMA.
Cited: Art. 14, v1 · Art. 14, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 14
Requirement for registration
1. A credit rating agency shall apply for registration for the purposes of Article 2(1) provided that it is a legal person established in the Community.
2. The registration shall be effective for the entire territory of the Community Union once the registration decision issued to register a credit rating agency adopted by the competent authority of the home Member State ESMA as referred to in Article 16(7) 16(3) or Article 17(7) 17(3) has taken effect under the relevant national law. effect.
3. A registered credit rating agency shall comply at all times with the conditions for initial registration.
A credit rating agency shall, without undue delay, notify CESR, the competent authority of its home Member State and the facilitator ESMA of any material changes to the conditions for initial registration, including any opening or closing of a branch within the Community. Union.
4. Without prejudice to Articles Article 16 or 17, the competent authority of the home Member State ESMA shall register the credit rating agency if it concludes from the examination of the application that the credit rating agency complies with the conditions for the issuing of credit ratings set out in this Regulation, taking into consideration Articles 4 and 6.
5. Competent authorities ESMA shall not impose requirements regarding registration which are not provided for in this Regulation.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 14.2§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 14.3§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 14.4§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 14.5§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +343 −1,229 Art. 15 Application for registration§
applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)
dates added to the text: 1958-04-15
The provision replaces CESR with ESMA as the body receiving registration applications and the associated notifications, and the language requirement in paragraph 3 is changed from submission in the home Member State's required language plus a language customary in international finance to submission in any official language of the institutions of the Union, with Regulation No 1 of 15 April 1958 on languages applying mutatis mutandis to communications between ESMA and credit rating agencies.
The separate steps previously split between CESR's transmission and advice role and the competent authority of the home Member State's completeness assessment (paragraphs 4 to 6) are consolidated into a single paragraph 4 in which ESMA itself assesses completeness within 20 working days, sets deadlines for additional information, and notifies the credit rating agency, removing the prior distinct five-day, ten-day and 25-day steps and the involvement of the college of competent authorities.
Cited: Art. 15, v1 · Art. 15, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 15
Application for registration
1. The credit rating agency shall submit an application for registration to CESR. ESMA. The application shall contain information on the matters set out in Annex II.
2. Where a group of credit rating agencies applies for registration, the members of the group shall mandate one of their number to submit all the applications to CESR ESMA on behalf of the group. The mandated credit rating agency shall provide the information on the matters set out in Annex II for each member of the group.
3. A credit rating agency shall submit its application in the language which is required under the law of its home Member State and also in a language customary in the sphere of international finance.
An application for registration sent by CESR to the competent authority any of the home Member State shall be considered official languages of the institutions of the Union. The provisions of Regulation No 1 of 15 April 1958 determining the languages to be an application submitted used by the European Economic CommunityOJ 17, 6.10.1958, p. 385/58. shall apply mutatis mutandis to any other communication between ESMA and the credit rating agency concerned. agencies and their staff.
4. Within five 20 working days of receipt of the application, CESR shall transmit copies of the application to the competent authorities of all Member States.
Within 10 working days of receipt of the application, CESR shall provide advice to the competent authority of the home Member State on the completeness of the application.
5. Within 25 working days of receipt of the application, the competent authority of the home Member State and the members of the relevant college ESMA shall assess whether the application is complete, taking into account the advice of CESR referred to in paragraph 4. complete. If the application is not complete, the competent authority of the home Member State ESMA shall set a deadline by which the credit rating agency is to provide additional information to it and to CESR and shall notify the members of the college and CESR accordingly. information.
After assessing an application as complete, the competent authority of the home Member State ESMA shall notify the credit rating agency, the members of the college and CESR agency accordingly.
6. Within five working days of receipt of the additional information referred to in paragraph 5, CESR shall transmit the additional information to the competent authorities of all other Member States.
MODIFIED +199 −2,506 Art. 16 Examination of the application for registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The heading and body of Article 16 change the examining actor from the competent authority of the home Member State and the members of the relevant college, coordinated by a facilitator, to ESMA acting alone.
The process is shortened and restructured: the joint examination and agreement-seeking steps, the CESR advice step, and the separate refusal-decision procedure for continued disagreement are removed, and the examination period, extension period, and cross-references to Article 15 timings are all changed to new figures tied to Article 15(4) instead of Article 15(5).
A new paragraph is added stating that the decision adopted by ESMA under paragraph 3 takes effect on the fifth working day following its adoption, a provision not present in the earlier text.
Cited: Art. 16, v1 · Art. 16, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 16 Examination of the application for registration of a credit rating agency by the competent authorities 1. The competent authority of the home Member State and the competent authorities which are members of the relevant college shall, within 60 working days of the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(5): (a) jointly examine the application for registration; and (b) do everything reasonable within their power to reach an agreement on whether to grant or refuse registration of the credit rating agency based on the compliance of the credit rating agency with the conditions set out in this Regulation. 2. The facilitator may extend the period of examination by 30 working days, in particular if the credit rating agency: (a) envisages endorsing credit ratings as referred to in Article 4(3); (b) envisages using outsourcing; or (c) requests exemption from compliance in accordance with Article 6(3). 3. The facilitator shall coordinate the examination of the application submitted by the credit rating agency and shall ensure that all information necessary to carry out the examination of the application is shared among the members of the relevant college. 4. The competent authority of the home Member State shall prepare a fully reasoned draft decision following the agreement referred to in paragraph 1(b) and shall submit it to the facilitator. In the absence of agreement among the members of the relevant college, the competent authority of the home Member State shall prepare a fully reasoned draft refusal decision based on the written opinions of the members of the college who oppose registration and shall submit it to the facilitator. The members of the college who are in favour of registration shall prepare and submit a detailed explanation of their opinions to the facilitator. 5. Within 60 working days of the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(5), and in any event within 90 working days thereof in the event that paragraph 2 applies, the facilitator shall communicate to CESR a fully reasoned draft registration or refusal decision accompanied by the detailed explanations referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 4. 6. Within 20 working days of receipt of the communication referred to in paragraph 5, CESR shall provide its advice on the compliance of the credit rating agency with the requirements for the registration to the members of the relevant college. Following receipt of CESR’s advice, the members of the college shall re-examine the draft decision. 7. The competent authority of the home Member State shall adopt a fully reasoned registration or refusal decision within 15 working days of receipt of CESR’s advice. If the competent authority of the home Member State departs from CESR’s advice, it shall provide full reasons. If CESR has provided no advice, the competent authority of the home Member State shall adopt its decision within 30 working days of the communication to CESR of the draft decision in accordance with paragraph 5. In the event of a continued absence of agreement among the members of the relevant college, the competent authority of the home Member State shall adopt a fully reasoned refusal decision, which shall identify the dissenting competent authorities and shall include a description of their opinions.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 16 Examination of the application for registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA 1. ESMA shall, within 45 working days of the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(4), examine the application for registration of a credit rating agency based on the compliance of the credit rating agency with the conditions set out in this Regulation. 2. ESMA may extend the period of examination by 15 working days, in particular if the credit rating agency: (a) envisages endorsing credit ratings as referred to in Article 4(3); (b) envisages using outsourcing; or (c) requests exemption from compliance in accordance with Article 6(3). 3. Within 45 working days of the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(4), or within 60 working days thereof where paragraph 2 of this Article applies, ESMA shall adopt a fully reasoned decision to register or refuse registration. 4. The decision adopted by ESMA pursuant to paragraph 3 shall take effect on the fifth working day following its adoption.
MODIFIED +272 −2,716 Art. 17 Examination of the applications for registration of a group of credit rating agencies by ESMA§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The heading and text change the examining actor from the facilitator and the competent authorities of the relevant college to ESMA acting alone, and the examination period is shortened from 60 working days to 55 working days, referencing Article 15(4) instead of Article 15(5).
The possible extension of the examination period is reduced from 30 working days to 15 working days, and the overall provision drops the prior multi-step process involving CESR advice, draft decisions by home Member State competent authorities, and college disagreement procedures, replacing them with ESMA directly adopting a fully reasoned individual decision to register or refuse registration within 55 or, where extended, 70 working days.
A new paragraph 4 states that the decision adopted by ESMA under paragraph 3 takes effect on the fifth working day following its adoption, a provision not present in the earlier text.
Cited: Art. 17, v1 · Art. 17, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 17 Examination of the applications for registration of a group of credit rating agencies by the competent authorities 1. The facilitator and the competent authorities who are members of the relevant college shall, within 60 working days of the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(5): (a) jointly examine the applications for registration; and (b) do everything reasonable within their power to reach an agreement on whether to grant or refuse registration of the members of the group of credit rating agencies based on the compliance of those credit rating agencies with the conditions set out in this Regulation. 2. The facilitator may extend the period of examination by 30 working days, in particular if any of credit rating agencies in the group: (a) envisages endorsing credit ratings as referred to in Article 4(3); (b) envisages using outsourcing; or (c) requests exemption from compliance in accordance with Article 6(3). 3. The facilitator shall coordinate the examination of the applications submitted by the group of credit rating agencies and shall ensure that all information necessary to carry out the examination of the applications is shared among the members of the relevant college. 4. The competent authorities of the home Member States shall prepare individual fully reasoned draft decisions for each credit rating agency of the group following the agreement referred to in paragraph 1(b) and shall submit it to the facilitator. In the absence of agreement among the members of the relevant college, the competent authorities of the home Member States shall prepare fully reasoned draft refusal decisions based on the written opinions of the members of the college who oppose registration and shall submit them to the facilitator. The members of the college who are in favour of registration shall prepare and submit a detailed explanation of their opinions to the facilitator. 5. Within 60 working days of the notification as referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(5), and in any event within 90 working days thereof in the event that paragraph 2 applies, the facilitator shall communicate to CESR fully reasoned individual draft registration or refusal decisions accompanied by the detailed explanations referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 4. 6. Within 20 working days of receipt of the communication referred to in paragraph 5, CESR shall provide its advice on the compliance of the credit rating agencies of the group with the requirements for the registration to the members of the relevant college. Following receipt of CESR’s advice, the members of the college shall re-examine the draft decisions. 7. The competent authorities of the home Member States shall adopt fully reasoned registration or refusal decisions within 15 working days of receipt of the advice of CESR. If the competent authorities of the home Member States depart from CESR’s advice, they shall provide full reasons. If CESR has provided no advice, the competent authorities of the home Member States shall adopt their decisions within 30 working days of the communication to CESR of the draft decisions in accordance with paragraph 5. In the event of continued absence of agreement among the members of the relevant college on whether to register any of the credit rating agencies of the group, the competent authority of the home Member State of such credit rating agency shall adopt a fully reasoned refusal decision, which shall identify the dissenting competent authorities and shall include a description of their opinions.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 17 Examination of the applications for registration of a group of credit rating agencies by ESMA 1. ESMA shall, within 55 working days of the notification referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(4), examine the applications for registration of a group of credit rating agencies based on the compliance of those credit rating agencies with the conditions set out in this Regulation. 2. ESMA may extend the period of examination by 15 working days, in particular if any of the credit rating agencies in the group: (a) envisages endorsing credit ratings as referred to in Article 4(3); (b) envisages using outsourcing; or (c) requests exemption from compliance in accordance with Article 6(3). 3. Within 55 working days of the notification as referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 15(4), or within 70 working days thereof where paragraph 2 of this Article applies, ESMA shall adopt a fully reasoned individual decision to register or refuse registration for each credit rating agency of the group. 4. The decision adopted by ESMA pursuant to paragraph 3 shall take effect on the fifth working day following its adoption.
MODIFIED +894 −450 Art. 18 Notification of a decision to register, refuse or withdraw registration, and publication of the list of registered credit rating agencies§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The heading and the notifying/notified actor changed from the competent authority of the home Member State to ESMA, which now notifies the credit rating agency of decisions under Article 16, 17 or 20 and must give full reasons if it refuses registration or withdraws it.
The list of bodies receiving communication of such decisions was expanded from the Commission, CESR and other competent authorities to the Commission, EBA, EIOPA, the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities, with ESMA now performing this communication.
Publication duties were reallocated so that ESMA publishes the list of registered credit rating agencies on its website and updates it within five working days of a decision under Article 16, 17 or 20, while the Commission separately publishes that updated list in the Official Journal within 30 days of the update, replacing the earlier single 30-day update rule tied to notification under paragraph 2.
Cited: Art. 18, v1 · Art. 18, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 18 Notification of the decision on the registration, refusal of registration or the withdrawal of registration of a credit rating agency 1. Within five working days of the adoption of a decision under Articles 16 or 17 the competent authority of the home Member State shall notify the credit rating agency concerned whether or not it has been registered. Where the competent authority of the home Member State refuses to register the credit rating agency, it shall provide full reasons in its decision. 2. The competent authority of the home Member State shall notify the Commission, CESR and the other competent authorities of any decision under Article 16, 17 or 20. 3. The Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union and on its website a list of credit rating agencies registered in accordance with this Regulation. That list shall be updated within 30 days of the notification referred to in paragraph 2.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 18 Notification of a decision to register, refuse or withdraw registration, and publication of the list of registered credit rating agencies 1. Within five working days of the adoption of a decision under Article 16, 17 or 20 ESMA shall notify its decision to the credit rating agency concerned. Where ESMA refuses to register the credit rating agency or withdraws the registration of the credit rating agency, it shall provide full reasons in its decision. 2. ESMA shall communicate to the Commission, the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilOJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12. (EBA), the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilOJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 48. (EIOPA), the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities, any decision under Article 16, 17 or 20. 3. ESMA shall publish on its website a list of credit rating agencies registered in accordance with this Regulation. That list shall be updated within five working days following the adoption of a decision under Article 16, 17 or 20. The Commission shall publish that updated list in the Official Journal of the European Union within 30 days following such update.
MODIFIED +1,226 −184 Art. 19 Registration and supervisory fees§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The provision changes from a single unnumbered paragraph allowing the competent authority of the home Member State to charge fees proportionate to its costs, to a two-paragraph structure in which ESMA charges the fees to credit rating agencies.
The new paragraph 1 states that the fees must fully cover ESMA's necessary expenditure on registration and supervision plus reimbursement of costs incurred by competent authorities carrying out delegated work under Article 30, while the new paragraph 2 assigns the Commission the task of adopting a regulation on fees, specifying fee types, amounts, payment arrangements and reimbursement mechanisms, and requiring fees charged to a credit rating agency to cover administrative costs and be proportionate to that agency's turnover.
The after text further specifies that the Commission is to adopt this fees regulation by means of a delegated act in accordance with Article 38a and subject to the conditions of Articles 38b and 38c.
Cited: Art. 19, v1 · Art. 19, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 19 Registration and supervisory fees The competent authority of the home Member State may charge registration and/or supervisory fees to the credit rating agency. The registration and/or supervisory fees shall be proportionate to the cost incurred by the competent authority of the home Member State.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 19 Registration and supervisory fees 1. ESMA shall charge fees to the credit rating agencies in accordance with this Regulation and the regulation on fees referred to in paragraph 2. Those fees shall fully cover ESMA's necessary expenditure relating to the registration and supervision of credit rating agencies and the reimbursement of any costs that the competent authorities may incur carrying out work pursuant to this Regulation, in particular as a result of any delegation of tasks in accordance with Article 30. 2. The Commission shall adopt a regulation on fees. That regulation shall determine in particular the type of fees and the matters for which fees are due, the amount of the fees, the way in which they are to be paid and the way in which ESMA is to reimburse competent authorities in respect of any costs that they may incur carrying out work pursuant to this Regulation, in particular as a result of any delegation of tasks in accordance with Article 30. The amount of a fee charged to a credit rating agency shall cover all administrative costs and be proportionate to the turnover of the credit rating agency concerned. The Commission shall adopt the regulation on fees referred to in the first subparagraph by means of a delegated act in accordance with Article 38a and subject to the conditions of Articles 38b and 38c.
MODIFIED +120 −1,679 Art. 20 Withdrawal of registration§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The provision now assigns the withdrawal decision to ESMA rather than to the competent authority of the home Member State, and removes the earlier college-of-supervisors procedure involving notification of a facilitator, joint assessment, CESR advice and individual national decisions.
Point (d) of paragraph 1, concerning serious or repeated infringement of operating-condition provisions, is no longer present, and point (b) drops the word "expressly" is unchanged wording but point (c) is now the final listed ground, ending with "or" only after point (b).
The remaining text reassigns to ESMA the function previously held by the competent authority of the home Member State when another Member State's competent authority raises a concern, and the effect provision now refers to the Union instead of the Community and cites Article 24(4) instead of Article 24(2).
Cited: Art. 20, v1 · Art. 20, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 20
Withdrawal of registration
1. The competent authority of the home Member State Without prejudice to Article 24, ESMA shall withdraw the registration of a credit rating agency where the credit rating agency:
(a) expressly renounces the registration or has provided no credit ratings for the preceding six months;
(b) has obtained the registration by making false statements or by any other irregular means;
or
(c) no longer meets the conditions under which it was registered; or
(d) has seriously or repeatedly infringed the provisions of this Regulation governing the operating conditions for credit rating agencies. registered.
2. Where the competent authority of the home Member State considers that one of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 has been met, it shall notify the facilitator and closely cooperate with members of the relevant college in order to decide whether or not to withdraw the registration of the credit rating agency.
The members of the college shall carry out a joint assessment and do everything reasonable within their power to reach an agreement on the necessity to withdraw the registration to the credit rating agency.
In the absence of agreement, the competent authority of the home Member State shall, at the request of any of the other members of the college or on its own initiative, request advice from CESR. CESR shall provide its advice within 15 working days of receipt of such request.
The competent authority of each home Member State shall adopt an individual withdrawal decision on the basis of the agreement reached within the college.
In the absence of an agreement between the members of the college within 30 working days of notification to the facilitator as referred to in the first subparagraph, the competent authority of the home Member State may adopt an individual withdrawal decision. Any deviation of its decision from the opinions expressed by the other members of the college and, where appropriate, the advice provided by CESR shall be fully reasoned.
3. The competent authority of a Member State in which credit ratings issued by the credit rating agency concerned are used and which considers that one of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 has been met may request the relevant college to that ESMA examine whether the conditions for the withdrawal of the registration of the credit rating agency concerned are met. If the competent authority of the home Member State ESMA decides not to withdraw the registration of the credit rating agency concerned, it shall provide full reasons.
4. 3.
The decision on the withdrawal of registration shall take immediate effect throughout the Community, Union, subject to the transitional period for the use of credit ratings referred to in Article 24(2). 24(4).
MODIFIED +1,556 −1,615 Art. 21 ESMA§
applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)
dates added to the text: 2011-06-07, 2012-01-01, 2012-01-02 · dates removed: 2010-06-07, 2010-09-07, 2010-12-07
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The provision's heading and body actor changes from the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) to ESMA, and the substance shifts from CESR issuing advice and guidance to ESMA ensuring application of the Regulation and issuing guidelines under Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
The guidance deadlines of 7 June 2010, 7 September 2010 and 7 December 2010 are replaced with new dates of 7 June 2011, 2 January 2012 and 1 January 2012, and the earlier guidance topics on registration, colleges and endorsement are replaced by a requirement for ESMA to submit draft regulatory technical standards on registration information, certification, disclosure presentation, methodology compliance assessment and ratings data reporting.
A new paragraph requires ESMA to report annually to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on supervisory measures and penalties, and the cooperation duty is changed from consulting the Committee of European Banking Supervisors and the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors to cooperating with and consulting EBA and EIOPA.
Cited: Art. 21, v1 · Art. 21, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 21 Committee of European Securities Regulators 1. CESR shall provide advice to the competent authorities in the cases provided for in this Regulation. The competent authorities shall consider that advice before taking any final decision under this Regulation. 2. By 7 June 2010, CESR shall issue guidance on: (a) the registration process and coordination arrangements between competent authorities and with CESR, including on the information set out in Annex II, and language regime for applications submitted to CESR; (b) the operational functioning of the colleges, including on the modalities for determining the membership to the colleges, the application of the criteria for the selection of the facilitator referred to in Article 29(5)(a) to (d), the written arrangements for the operation of colleges and the coordination arrangements between colleges; (c) the application of the endorsement regime under Article 4(3) by competent authorities; and (d) common standards on the presentation of the information, including structure, format, method and period of reporting, that credit rating agencies shall disclose in accordance with Article 11(2) and point 1 of Part II of Section E of Annex I. 3. By 7 September 2010, CESR shall issue guidance on: (a) enforcement practices and activities to be conducted by competent authorities under this Regulation; (b) common standards for assessment of compliance of credit rating methodologies with the requirements set out in Article 8(3); (c) types of measures referred to in Article 24(1)(d) to ensure that credit rating agencies continue to comply with legal requirements; and (d) information that the credit rating agency must provide for the application for certification and for the assessment of its systemic importance to the financial stability or integrity of financial markets referred to in Article 5. 4. CESR shall publish, annually and for the first time by 7 December 2010, a report on the application of this Regulation. That report shall contain, in particular, an assessment of the implementation of Annex I by the credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation. 5. CESR shall cooperate with the Committee of European Banking Supervisors established by Commission Decision 2009/78/ECOJ L 25, 29.1.2009, p. 23. and the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors established by Commission Decision 2009/79/ECOJ L 25, 29.1.2009, p. 28. and shall consult those Committees before publishing guidance referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 21 ESMA 1. Without prejudice to Article 25a, ESMA shall ensure that this Regulation is applied. 2. In accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA shall issue and update guidelines on the cooperation between ESMA, the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities for the purposes of this Regulation and for those of the relevant sectoral legislation, including the procedures and detailed conditions relating to the delegation of tasks. 3. In accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA shall, in cooperation with EBA and EIOPA, issue and update guidelines on the application of the endorsement regime under Article 4(3) of this Regulation by 7 June 2011. 4. By 2 January 2012 ESMA shall submit draft regulatory technical standards for endorsement by the Commission in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 on: (a) the information to be provided by a credit rating agency in its application for registration as set out in Annex II; (b) information that the credit rating agency must provide for the application for certification and for the assessment of its systemic importance to the financial stability or integrity of financial markets referred to in Article 5; (c) the presentation of the information, including structure, format, method and period of reporting, that credit rating agencies shall disclose in accordance with Article 11(2) and point 1 of Part II of Section E of Annex I; (d) the assessment of compliance of credit rating methodologies with the requirements set out in Article 8(3); (e) the content and format of ratings data periodic reporting to be requested from the credit rating agencies for the purpose of ongoing supervision by ESMA. 5. ESMA shall publish, annually and for the first time by 1 January 2012, a report on the application of this Regulation. That report shall contain, in particular, an assessment of the implementation of Annex I by the credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation. 6. ESMA shall present annually to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission a report on supervisory measures taken and penalties imposed by ESMA under this Regulation, including fines and periodic penalty payments. 7. ESMA shall cooperate with EBA and EIOPA in performing its tasks and shall consult EBA and EIOPA before issuing and updating guidelines and submitting draft regulatory technical standards referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 22§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
INSERTED +623 −0 Art. 22a Examination of compliance with the back-testing obligation§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This is a newly inserted article giving ESMA a role in regularly examining compliance with the back-testing obligation under Article 8(3) as part of its ongoing supervision of registered credit rating agencies.
It further specifies that, without prejudice to Article 23, ESMA is to verify the execution of back-testing, analyse the results of that back-testing, and verify that credit rating agencies have processes to take those results into account in their rating methodologies.
Cited: Art. 22a, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 22a Examination of compliance with the back-testing obligation 1. In the exercise of its ongoing supervision of credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation, ESMA shall examine regularly compliance with Article 8(3). 2. Without prejudice to Article 23, ESMA shall also in the framework of the examination referred to in paragraph 1: (a) verify the execution of back-testing by credit rating agencies; (b) analyse the results of that back-testing; and (c) verify that the credit rating agencies have processes in place to take into account the results of the back-testing in their rating methodologies.
MODIFIED +74 −1,360 Art. 23 Non-interference with content of ratings or methodologies§
applies from: unchanged
The heading changes from 'Powers of competent authorities' to 'Non-interference with content of ratings or methodologies', and the article is reduced from three numbered paragraphs to a single unnumbered sentence.
The remaining text now states that ESMA, the Commission or any public authorities of a Member State shall not interfere with the content of credit ratings or methodologies, whereas before it named only competent authorities and other public authorities of a Member State.
The former paragraphs 2 and 3, which listed supervisory and investigatory powers of competent authorities and the categories of persons those powers could be used against, no longer appear in the text.
Cited: Art. 23, v1 · Art. 23, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 23 Powers of competent authorities 1. In carrying out their duties under this Regulation, neither the competent authorities nor any other public authorities of a Member State shall interfere with the content of credit ratings or methodologies. 2. In order to carry out their duties under this Regulation, the competent authorities shall, in conformity with national law, have all the supervisory and investigatory powers that are necessary for the exercise of their functions. They shall exercise their powers: (a) directly; (b) in collaboration with other authorities; or (c) by application to the competent judicial authorities. 3. In order to carry out their duties under this Regulation, the competent authorities shall, in conformity with national law, have the power in their supervisory capacity to: (a) access any document in any form and to receive or take a copy thereof; (b) demand information from any person and if necessary to summon and question a person with a view to obtaining information; (c) carry out on-site inspections with or without announcement; and (d) require records of telephone and data traffic. The competent authorities may use the powers referred to in the first subparagraph only in relation to credit rating agencies, persons involved in credit rating activities, rated entities and related third parties, third parties to whom the credit rating agencies have outsourced certain functions or activities, and persons otherwise related or connected to credit rating agencies or credit rating activities.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 23 Non-interference with content of ratings or methodologies In carrying out their duties under this Regulation, ESMA, the Commission or any public authorities of a Member State shall not interfere with the content of credit ratings or methodologies.
INSERTED +285 −0 Art. 23a Exercise of the powers referred to in Articles 23b to 23d§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
A new Article 23a is added, stating that the powers given to ESMA, or to any official or other person authorised by ESMA, under Articles 23b to 23d cannot be used to require disclosure of information or documents that are subject to legal privilege.
Cited: Art. 23a, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 23a Exercise of the powers referred to in Articles 23b to 23d The powers conferred on ESMA or any official of or other person authorised by ESMA by Articles 23b to 23d shall not be used to require the disclosure of information or documents which are subject to legal privilege.
INSERTED +2,751 −0 Art. 23b Requests for information§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This new Article 23b sets out ESMA's power to require credit rating agencies, related persons, rated entities and other connected parties to supply information necessary for carrying out its duties, either through a simple request or a formal decision.
It specifies the content that a simple request must contain, including the legal basis, purpose, required information, time-limit, a statement that supply is not obligatory, and mention of the fine for incorrect or misleading answers, and separately sets out what a decision must contain, adding reference to periodic penalty payments and a right of appeal.
The article also addresses who must supply the requested information, including representatives and lawyers, and requires ESMA to send a copy of the request or decision to the competent authority of the Member State where the concerned persons are domiciled or established.
Cited: Art. 23b, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 23b Requests for information 1. ESMA may by simple request or by decision require credit rating agencies, persons involved in credit rating activities, rated entities and related third parties, third parties to whom the credit rating agencies have outsourced operational functions or activities and persons otherwise closely and substantially related or connected to credit rating agencies or credit rating activities to provide all information that is necessary in order to carry out its duties under this Regulation. 2. When sending a simple request for information under paragraph 1, ESMA shall: (a) refer to this Article as the legal basis for the request; (b) state the purpose of the request; (c) specify what information is required; (d) set a time-limit within which the information is to be provided; (e) inform the person from whom the information is requested that there is no obligation to provide the information but that any reply to the request for information must not be incorrect or misleading; (f) indicate the fine provided for in Article 36a, in conjunction with point 7 of Section II of Annex III, where the answers to questions asked are incorrect or misleading. 3. When requiring the supply of information under paragraph 1 by decision, ESMA shall: (a) refer to this Article as the legal basis for the request; (b) state the purpose of the request; (c) specify what information is required; (d) set a time-limit within which the information is to be provided; (e) indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b where the production of the required information is incomplete; (f) indicate the fine provided for in Article 36a, in conjunction with point 7 of Section II of Annex III, where the answers to questions asked are incorrect or misleading; and (g) indicate the right to appeal the decision before the Board of Appeal and to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in accordance with Articles 60 and 61 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. 4. The persons referred to in paragraph 1 or their representatives and, in the case of legal persons or associations having no legal personality, the persons authorised to represent them by law or by their constitution, shall supply the information requested. Lawyers duly authorised to act may supply the information on behalf of their clients. The latter shall remain fully responsible if the information supplied is incomplete, incorrect or misleading. 5. ESMA shall, without delay, send a copy of the simple request or of its decision to the competent authority of the Member State where the persons referred to in paragraph 1 who are concerned by the request for information are domiciled or established.
INSERTED +3,938 −0 Art. 23c General investigations§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This is a newly inserted Article 23c that grants ESMA a set of investigatory powers over persons referred to in Article 23b(1), including examining records, taking copies, requesting oral or written explanations, interviewing consenting third parties, and requesting telephone and data traffic records.
The provision also sets out procedural requirements for such investigations, including written authorisation of officials, a decision specifying the subject matter and available legal remedies, notification of the relevant Member State competent authority, and conditions for judicial authorisation and its limited scope of review where telephone or data traffic records are sought.
Cited: Art. 23c, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 23c General investigations 1. In order to carry out its duties under this Regulation, ESMA may conduct all necessary investigations of persons referred to in Article 23b(1). To that end, the officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA shall be empowered to: (a) examine any records, data, procedures and any other material relevant to the execution of its tasks irrespective of the medium on which they are stored; (b) take or obtain certified copies of or extracts from such records, data, procedures and other material; (c) summon and ask any person referred to in Article 23b(1) or their representatives or staff for oral or written explanations on facts or documents related to the subject matter and purpose of the inspection and to record the answers; (d) interview any other natural or legal person who consents to be interviewed for the purpose of collecting information relating to the subject matter of an investigation; (e) request records of telephone and data traffic. 2. The officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA for the purposes of the investigations referred to in paragraph 1 shall exercise their powers upon production of a written authorisation specifying the subject matter and purpose of the investigation. That authorisation shall also indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b where the production of the required records, data, procedures or any other material, or the answers to questions asked of the persons referred to in Article 23b(1) are not provided or are incomplete, and the fines provided for in Article 36a, in conjunction with point 8 of Section II of Annex III, where the answers to questions asked of the persons referred to in Article 23b(1) are incorrect or misleading. 3. The persons referred to in Article 23b(1) shall submit to investigations launched on the basis of a decision of ESMA. The decision shall specify the subject matter and purpose of the investigation, the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b, the legal remedies available under Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 and the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union. 4. In good time before the investigation, ESMA shall inform the competent authority of the Member State where the investigation is to be carried out of the investigation and of the identity of the authorised persons. Officials of the competent authority concerned shall, upon the request of ESMA, assist those authorised persons in carrying out their duties. Officials of the competent authority concerned may also attend the investigations upon request. 5. If a request for records of telephone or data traffic referred to in point (e) of paragraph 1 requires authorisation from a judicial authority according to national rules, such authorisation shall be applied for. Such authorisation may also be applied for as a precautionary measure. 6. Where authorisation as referred to in paragraph 5 is applied for, the national judicial authority shall control that the decision of ESMA is authentic and that the coercive measures envisaged are neither arbitrary nor excessive having regard to the subject matter of the investigations. In its control of the proportionality of the coercive measures, the national judicial authority may ask ESMA for detailed explanations, in particular relating to the grounds ESMA has for suspecting that an infringement of this Regulation has taken place and the seriousness of the suspected infringement and the nature of the involvement of the person subject to the coercive measures. However, the national judicial authority shall not review the necessity for the investigation or demand that it be provided with the information on ESMA's file. The lawfulness of ESMA's decision shall be subject to review only by the Court of Justice of the European Union following the procedure set out in Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
INSERTED +4,309 −0 Art. 23d On-site inspections§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This provision introduces a new Article 23d, which did not previously exist, empowering ESMA to conduct on-site inspections at the business premises of certain legal persons and setting out related procedures.
It describes the powers of ESMA officials during inspections, the obligations of inspected persons and Member State competent authorities to cooperate, and the role of national judicial authorities in authorising and reviewing coercive measures.
Cited: Art. 23d, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 23d On-site inspections 1. In order to carry out its duties under this Regulation, ESMA may conduct all necessary on-site inspections at the business premises of the legal persons referred to in Article 23b(1). Where the proper conduct and efficiency of the inspection so require, ESMA may carry out the on-site inspection without prior announcement. 2. The officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA to conduct an on-site inspection may enter any business premises and land of the legal persons subject to an investigation decision adopted by ESMA and shall have all the powers stipulated in Article 23c(1). They shall also have the power to seal any business premises and books or records for the period of, and to the extent necessary for, the inspection. 3. The officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA to conduct an on-site inspection shall exercise their powers upon production of a written authorisation specifying the subject matter and purpose of the inspection, and the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b where the persons concerned do not submit to the inspection. In good time before the inspection, ESMA shall give notice of the inspection to the competent authority of the Member State where it is to be conducted. 4. The persons referred to in Article 23b(1) shall submit to on-site inspections ordered by decision of ESMA. The decision shall specify the subject matter and purpose of the inspection, specify the date on which it is to begin and indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 36b, the legal remedies available under Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 as well as the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union. ESMA shall take such decisions after consulting the competent authority of the Member State where the inspection is to be conducted. 5. Officials of, as well as those authorised or appointed by, the competent authority of the Member State where the inspection is to be conducted shall, upon the request of ESMA, actively assist the officials of and other persons authorised by ESMA. To that end, they shall enjoy the powers set out in paragraph 2. Officials of the competent authority of the Member State concerned may also attend the on-site inspections upon request. 6. ESMA may also require competent authorities to carry out specific investigatory tasks and on-site inspections as provided for in this Article and in Article 23c(1) on its behalf. To that end, competent authorities shall enjoy the same powers as ESMA as set out in this Article and in Article 23c(1). 7. Where the officials of and other accompanying persons authorised by ESMA find that a person opposes an inspection ordered pursuant to this Article, the competent authority of the Member State concerned shall afford them the necessary assistance, requesting, where appropriate, the assistance of the police or of an equivalent enforcement authority, so as to enable them to conduct their on-site inspection. 8. If the on-site inspection provided for in paragraph 1 or the assistance provided for in paragraph 7 requires authorisation by a judicial authority according to national rules, such authorisation shall be applied for. Such authorisation may also be applied for as a precautionary measure. 9. Where authorisation as referred to in paragraph 8 is applied for, the national judicial authority shall control that the decision of ESMA is authentic and that the coercive measures envisaged are neither arbitrary nor excessive having regard to the subject matter of the inspection. In its control of the proportionality of the coercive measures, the national judicial authority may ask ESMA for detailed explanations, in particular relating to the grounds ESMA has for suspecting that an infringement of this Regulation has taken place and the seriousness of the suspected infringement and the nature of the involvement of the person subject to the coercive measures. However, the national judicial authority shall not review the necessity for the inspection or demand to be provided with the information on ESMA's file. The lawfulness of ESMA's decision shall be subject to review only by the Court of Justice of the European Union following the procedure set out in Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
INSERTED +4,134 −0 Art. 23e Procedural rules for taking supervisory measures and imposing fines§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
A new Article 23e is added, setting out procedural rules for how ESMA takes supervisory measures and imposes fines, including the appointment of an independent investigating officer, that officer's investigative powers, the rights of persons under investigation, the Board of Supervisors' decision process, delegated rulemaking by the Commission on fine procedures, and referral of matters for criminal prosecution.
Cited: Art. 23e, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 23e Procedural rules for taking supervisory measures and imposing fines 1. Where, in carrying out its duties under this Regulation, ESMA finds that there are serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in Annex III, ESMA shall appoint an independent investigating officer within ESMA to investigate the matter. The investigating officer shall not be involved or have been involved in the direct or indirect supervision or registration process of the credit rating agency concerned and shall perform his functions independently from ESMA's Board of Supervisors. 2. The investigating officer shall investigate the alleged infringements, taking into account any comments submitted by the persons subject to investigation, and shall submit a complete file with his findings to ESMA's Board of Supervisors. In order to carry out his tasks, the investigating officer may exercise the power to require information in accordance with Article 23b and to conduct investigations and on-site inspections in accordance with Articles 23c and 23d. When using those powers, the investigating officer shall comply with Article 23a. Where carrying out his tasks, the investigating officer shall have access to all documents and information gathered by ESMA in its supervisory activities. 3. Upon completion of his investigation and before submitting the file with his findings to ESMA's Board of Supervisors, the investigating officer shall give the persons subject to investigation the opportunity to be heard on the matters being investigated. The investigating officer shall base his findings only on facts on which the persons subject to investigation have had the opportunity to comment. The rights of defence of the persons concerned shall be fully respected during investigations under this Article. 4. When submitting the file with his findings to ESMA's Board of Supervisors, the investigating officer shall notify that fact to the persons subject to investigation. The persons subject to investigation shall be entitled to have access to the file, subject to the legitimate interest of other persons in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information affecting third parties. 5. On the basis of the file containing the investigating officer's findings and, when requested by the persons concerned, after having heard the persons subject to investigation in accordance with Articles 25 and 36c, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall decide if one or more of the infringements listed in Annex III has been committed by the persons who have been subject to investigation, and in such case, shall take a supervisory measure in accordance with Article 24 and impose a fine in accordance with Article 36a. 6. The investigating officer shall not participate in the deliberations of ESMA's Board of Supervisors or in any other way intervene in the decision-making process of ESMA's Board of Supervisors. 7. The Commission shall adopt further rules of procedure for the exercise of the power to impose fines or periodic penalty payments, including provisions on rights of defence, temporal provisions, and the collection of fines or periodic penalty payments, and shall adopt detailed rules on the limitation periods for the imposition and enforcement of penalties. The rules referred to in the first subparagraph shall be adopted by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a and subject to the conditions of Articles 38b and 38c. 8. ESMA shall refer matters for criminal prosecution to the relevant national authorities where, in carrying out its duties under this Regulation, it finds that there are serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute criminal offences. In addition, ESMA shall refrain from imposing fines or periodic penalty payments where a prior acquittal or conviction arising from identical facts, or from facts which are substantially the same, has acquired the force of res judicata as the result of criminal proceedings under national law.
MODIFIED +2,060 −1,634 Art. 24 Supervisory measures by ESMA§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The heading and substance shift the supervisory power from the competent authority of the home Member State to ESMA's Board of Supervisors, which acts upon a finding under Article 23e(5) that an infringement listed in Annex III has occurred, rather than a general finding that a registered agency breaches the Regulation's obligations.
The list of available measures is altered, dropping the prior options to take appropriate compliance measures or refer matters for criminal prosecution, and replacing them with a requirement that the agency bring the infringement to an end, while the withdrawal, prohibition, suspension and public-notice measures are retained in modified wording.
New paragraphs are added on the criteria ESMA must weigh when deciding on measures, on prior notice to EBA and EIOPA, and on the timing, notification and publication of decisions, including a right of appeal referencing Article 60(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, none of which appeared in the earlier text on college consultation and CESR advice.
Cited: Art. 24, v1 · Art. 24, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 24 Supervisory measures by the competent authorities of the home Member State 1. Where the competent authority of the home Member State has established that a registered credit rating agency breaches the obligations arising from this Regulation, it may take the following measures: (a) withdraw the registration of that credit rating agency in accordance with Article 20; (b) temporarily prohibit that credit rating agency from issuing credit ratings with effect throughout the Community; (c) suspend the use, for regulatory purposes, of the credit ratings issued by that credit rating agency with effect throughout the Community; (d) take appropriate measures to ensure that credit rating agencies continue to comply with legal requirements; (e) issue public notices; (f) refer matters for criminal prosecution to its relevant national authorities. 2. Credit ratings may continue to be used for regulatory purposes following the adoption of measures in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1 during a period not exceeding: (a) ten working days if there are credit ratings of the same financial instrument or entity issued by other credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation; or (b) three months if there are no credit ratings of the same financial instrument or entity issued by other credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation. A competent authority may extend the period referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph by three months in exceptional circumstances relating to the potential for market disruption or financial instability. 3. Before taking any measures referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority of the home Member State shall notify the facilitator and shall consult the members of the relevant college. The members of the college shall do everything reasonable within their power to reach an agreement on the necessity to take any measures referred to in paragraph 1. In the absence of agreement between the members of the college, the competent authority of the home Member State shall, at the request of any member of the college or on its own initiative, request advice from CESR. CESR shall provide its advice within 10 working days of receipt of such request. In the absence of agreement between the members of the college on whether to take any measures referred to in paragraph 1 within 15 working days after the matter was notified to the facilitator as referred to in the first subparagraph, the competent authority of the home Member State may adopt a decision. Any deviation of that decision from the opinions expressed by the other members of the college and, where appropriate, the advice provided by CESR shall be fully reasoned. The competent authority of the home Member State shall notify its decision, without undue delay, to the facilitator and CESR. This paragraph shall apply without prejudice to Article 20.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 24 Supervisory measures by ESMA 1. Where, in accordance with Article 23e(5), ESMA's Board of Supervisors finds that a credit rating agency has committed one of the infringements listed in Annex III, it shall take one or more of the following decisions: (a) withdraw the registration of the credit rating agency; (b) temporarily prohibit the credit rating agency from issuing credit ratings with effect throughout the Union, until the infringement has been brought to an end; (c) suspend the use, for regulatory purposes, of the credit ratings issued by the credit rating agency with effect throughout the Union, until the infringement has been brought to an end; (d) require the credit rating agency to bring the infringement to an end; (e) issue public notices. 2. When taking the decisions referred to in paragraph 1, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall take into account the nature and seriousness of the infringement, having regard to the following criteria: (a) the duration and frequency of the infringement; (b) whether the infringement has revealed serious or systemic weaknesses in the undertaking's procedures or in its management systems or internal controls; (c) whether financial crime was facilitated, occasioned or otherwise attributable to the infringement; (d) whether the infringement has been committed intentionally or negligently. 3. Before taking the decisions referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 1, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall inform EBA and EIOPA thereof. 4. Credit ratings may continue to be used for regulatory purposes following the adoption of the decisions referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 1 during a period not exceeding: (a) 10 working days from the date ESMA's decision is made public under paragraph 5 if there are credit ratings of the same financial instrument or entity issued by other credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation; or (b) three months from the date ESMA's decision is made public under paragraph 5 if there are no credit ratings of the same financial instrument or entity issued by other credit rating agencies registered under this Regulation. ESMA's Board of Supervisors may extend, including following a request by EBA or EIOPA, the period referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph by three months in exceptional circumstances relating to the potential for market disruption or financial instability. 5. Without undue delay, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall notify any decision adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 to the credit rating agency concerned and shall communicate any such decision to the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities, the Commission, EBA and EIOPA. It shall make public any such decision on its website within 10 working days from the date when it was adopted. When making public its decision as referred to in the first subparagraph, ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall also make public the right for the credit rating agency concerned to appeal the decision, the fact, where relevant, that such an appeal has been lodged, specifying that such an appeal does not have suspensive effect, and the fact that it is possible for the Board of Appeal to suspend the application of the contested decision in accordance with Article 60(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
MODIFIED +920 −2,154 Art. 25 Hearing of the persons concerned§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The provision's heading and subject matter changed entirely: the earlier version set out supervisory measures that a competent authority other than the home Member State's authority could take against a registered credit rating agency, including consultation with a college of supervisors and CESR, while the later version instead concerns the hearing of persons subject to proceedings before ESMA's Board of Supervisors.
The later text introduces provisions on the right to be heard before decisions under Article 24(1), an exception allowing an interim decision where urgent action is needed, and rights of defence including access to ESMA's file subject to protection of business secrets and exclusion of confidential information.
Cited: Art. 25, v1 · Art. 25, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 25 Supervisory measures by competent authorities other than the competent authority of the home Member State 1. Where the competent authority of a Member State has established that a registered credit rating agency whose ratings are used within its territory breaches the obligations arising from this Regulation, it may take the following measures: (a) adopt the supervisory measures referred to in Article 24(1)(e) and (f); (b) adopt measures referred to in Article 24(1)(d) within its jurisdiction and, where so doing, duly consider the measures already taken or envisaged by the competent authority of the home Member State; (c) impose the suspension of the use of credit ratings of that credit rating agency for regulatory purposes by institutions referred to in Article 4(1) whose registered office is located within its jurisdiction, subject to the transitional period referred to in Article 24(2); (d) request the relevant college to examine whether the measures referred to in points (b), (c) or (d) of Article 24(1) are needed. 2. Before the adoption of measures referred to in points (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 1, the competent authority shall notify the facilitator and consult the members of the relevant college. The members of the college shall do everything reasonable within their power to reach an agreement on the necessity to take any measures referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1. In the event of disagreement, the facilitator shall, at the request of any of the members of the college or on its own initiative, request advice from CESR. CESR shall provide its advice within 10 working days of receipt of such request. 3. In the absence of an agreement between the members of the relevant college within 15 working days of the matter being notified to the facilitator in accordance with paragraph 2, the competent authority of the Member State concerned may adopt a decision. Any deviation of its decision from the opinions expressed by the other members of the college and, where appropriate, the advice provided by CESR shall be fully reasoned. The competent authority of the Member State concerned shall notify its decision, without undue delay, to the facilitator and CESR. 4. This Article shall apply without prejudice to Article 20.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 25 Hearing of the persons concerned 1. Before taking any decision under Article 24(1), ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall give the persons subject to the proceedings the opportunity to be heard on ESMA's findings. ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall base its decisions only on findings on which the persons subject to the proceedings have had the opportunity to comment. The first subparagraph shall not apply if urgent action is needed in order to prevent significant and imminent damage to the financial system. In such a case ESMA's Board of Supervisors may adopt an interim decision and shall give the persons concerned the opportunity to be heard as soon as possible after taking its decision. 2. The rights of defence of the persons subject to the proceedings shall be fully respected during the proceedings. They shall be entitled to have access to ESMA's file, subject to the legitimate interest of other persons in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information.
INSERTED +296 −0 Art. 25a Sectoral competent authorities responsible for the supervision and enforcement of Article 4(1) (the use of credit ratings)§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This article is newly added and assigns sectoral competent authorities the role of supervising and enforcing Article 4(1) in accordance with relevant sectoral legislation.
Cited: Art. 25a, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 25a Sectoral competent authorities responsible for the supervision and enforcement of Article 4(1) (the use of credit ratings) The sectoral competent authorities shall be responsible for the supervision and enforcement of Article 4(1) in accordance with the relevant sectoral legislation.
MODIFIED +109 −346 Art. 26 Obligation to cooperate§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The provision no longer contains two separate numbered paragraphs, replacing them with a single sentence naming ESMA, EBA, EIOPA, the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities as the bodies with the obligation to cooperate, in place of the earlier text which referred only to the competent authorities cooperating with each other and with those supervising the undertakings referred to in Article 4(1).
The cooperation is now stated to be needed for the purposes of this Regulation and for those of the relevant sectoral legislation, whereas before it was tied to the purposes of this Regulation and to cases where investigated conduct might not infringe any legislative or regulatory provision in force in the Member State concerned.
Cited: Art. 26, v1 · Art. 26, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 26 Obligation to cooperate 1. The competent authorities shall cooperate where it is necessary for the purposes of this Regulation, including in cases where the conduct under investigation does not constitute an infringement of any legislative or regulatory provision in force in the Member State concerned. 2. The competent authorities shall also cooperate closely with the competent authorities responsible for supervision of the undertakings referred to in Article 4(1).
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 26 Obligation to cooperate ESMA, EBA, EIOPA, the competent authorities and the sectoral competent authorities shall cooperate where it is necessary for the purposes of this Regulation and for those of the relevant sectoral legislation.
MODIFIED +154 −189 Art. 27 Exchange of information§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
Paragraph 1 now names ESMA, the competent authorities, and the sectoral competent authorities as the parties obliged to supply each other with information without undue delay, and adds that this duty also arises under the relevant sectoral legislation, whereas the earlier text referred only to competent authorities and to duties under this Regulation.
Paragraph 2 now describes ESMA, rather than the competent authorities, as the body that may transmit confidential information to central banks, the European System of Central Banks, the European Central Bank, and the European Systemic Risk Board, and it drops the earlier reference to authorities supervising undertakings under Article 4(1), replacing it with the European Systemic Risk Board.
The reciprocal communication clause in paragraph 2 is now phrased in terms of information that ESMA may need to carry out its duties, in place of the earlier wording referring to the competent authorities' duties.
Cited: Art. 27, v1 · Art. 27, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 27
Exchange of information
1. The ESMA, the competent authorities, and the sectoral competent authorities shall, without undue delay, supply each other with the information required for the purposes of carrying out their duties under this Regulation. Regulation and under the relevant sectoral legislation.
2. The competent authorities ESMA may transmit to the competent authorities responsible for supervising the undertakings referred to in Article 4(1), central banks, the European System of Central Banks and the European Central Bank, in their capacity as monetary authorities, to the European Systemic Risk Board and, where appropriate, to other public authorities responsible for overseeing payment and settlement systems, confidential information intended for the performance of their tasks. Similarly, such authorities or bodies shall not be prevented from communicating to the competent authorities ESMA information that the competent authorities ESMA may need in order to carry out their its duties under this Regulation.
DELETED ±0 Art. 28§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata and the amending act's instructions found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 29§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +1,296 −129 Art. 30 Delegation of tasks by ESMA to competent authorities§
applies from: unchanged
The article's heading and subject change from delegation of tasks between competent authorities to delegation of tasks by ESMA to competent authorities, and the actor delegating tasks changes from the home Member State's competent authority to ESMA.
The single-paragraph before text is replaced by four numbered paragraphs covering the conditions and guidelines for delegation and the specific tasks that may be delegated, a consultation requirement with the relevant competent authority on scope, timetable and information transmission, a reimbursement mechanism for costs under a fees regulation, and a review and revocation mechanism together with a list of responsibilities that shall not be delegated.
The statement that delegation does not affect the responsibility of the delegating authority is retained but reattributed to ESMA, with an added statement that delegation does not limit ESMA's ability to conduct and oversee the delegated activity.
Cited: Art. 30, v1 · Art. 30, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 30 Delegation of tasks between competent authorities The competent authority of the home Member State may delegate any of its tasks to the competent authority of another Member State subject to the agreement of that authority. Delegation of tasks shall not affect the responsibility of the delegating competent authority.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 30 Delegation of tasks by ESMA to competent authorities 1. Where it is necessary for the proper performance of a supervisory task, ESMA may delegate specific supervisory tasks to the competent authority of a Member State in accordance with the guidelines issued by ESMA pursuant to Article 21(2). Such specific supervisory tasks may, in particular, include the power to request information in accordance with Article 23b and to conduct investigations and on-site inspections in accordance with Article 23d(6). 2. Prior to the delegation of a task, ESMA shall consult the relevant competent authority. Such consultation shall concern: (a) the scope of the task to be delegated; (b) the timetable for the performance of the task to be delegated; and (c) the transmission of necessary information by and to ESMA. 3. In accordance with the regulation on fees to be adopted by the Commission pursuant to Article 19(2), ESMA shall reimburse a competent authority for the costs incurred as a result of carrying out delegated tasks. 4. ESMA shall review the delegation referred to in paragraph 1 at appropriate intervals. A delegation of tasks may be revoked at any time. A delegation of tasks shall not affect the responsibility of ESMA and shall not limit ESMA's ability to conduct and oversee the delegated activity. Supervisory responsibilities under this Regulation, including registration decisions, final assessments and follow-up decisions concerning infringements, shall not be delegated.
MODIFIED +1,714 −349 Art. 31 Notifications and suspension requests by competent authorities§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The article's heading and content changed from describing a CESR mediation mechanism for disagreements between competent authorities into provisions on notifications by a competent authority to ESMA about acts contrary to the Regulation and on requests that ESMA suspend the regulatory use of a credit rating agency's ratings.
The earlier text had CESR establishing a mediation mechanism and receiving referrals from competent authorities who disagreed, while the later text instead has a competent authority notifying ESMA of suspected breaches, suggesting use of powers under Articles 23b and 23c, and requesting suspension of a credit rating agency's ratings with ESMA responding in writing.
Cited: Art. 31, v1 · Art. 31, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 31 Mediation 1. CESR shall establish a mediation mechanism to assist in finding a common view among the competent authorities concerned. 2. In the event of disagreement between competent authorities concerning an examination or action under this Regulation, they shall refer the matter to CESR for mediation. The competent authorities concerned shall give due consideration to the advice of CESR and shall provide full reasons for any deviation from that advice.
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 31 Notifications and suspension requests by competent authorities 1. Where a competent authority of a Member State finds that acts contrary to this Regulation are being, or have been, carried out on the territory of its own or of another Member State, it shall give notice of that fact in as specific a manner as possible to ESMA. Where the competent authority considers it appropriate for investigatory purposes, the competent authority may also suggest to ESMA that it assess the need to use the powers under Articles 23b and 23c in relation to the credit rating agency involved in those acts. ESMA shall take appropriate action. It shall inform the notifying competent authority of the outcome and, as far as possible, of any significant interim developments. 2. Without prejudice to the duty to notify set out in paragraph 1, where the notifying competent authority of a Member State considers that a registered credit rating agency, whose credit ratings are used within the territory of that Member State, breaches the obligations arising from this Regulation and the infringements are sufficiently serious and persistent to have a significant impact on the protection of investors or on the stability of the financial system in that Member State, the notifying competent authority may request that ESMA suspend the use, for regulatory purposes, of credit ratings of the credit rating agency concerned by the financial institutions and other entities referred to in Article 4(1). The notifying competent authority shall provide ESMA with full reasons for its request. Where ESMA considers that the request is not justified, it shall inform the notifying competent authority in writing, setting out the reasons. Where ESMA considers that the request is justified, it shall take the appropriate measures to resolve the issue.
MODIFIED +249 −144 Art. 32 Professional secrecy§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The obligation of professional secrecy is extended to name ESMA itself and the competent authorities directly, alongside persons working for them, and the delegation reference changes from the competent authority delegating tasks to ESMA delegating tasks to any other person.
The confidentiality provision in paragraph 2 changes from covering information exchanged between CESR and competent authorities to covering information acquired by or exchanged between ESMA, the competent authorities, the sectoral competent authorities, and other authorities and bodies referred to in Article 27(2), with the disclosure-statement actor expanded correspondingly from CESR or the competent authority to ESMA or the competent authority or other authority or body concerned.
Cited: Art. 32, v1 · Art. 32, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 32
Professional secrecy
1. The obligation of professional secrecy shall apply to ESMA, the competent authorities, and all persons who work or who have worked for CESR, ESMA, for the competent authority authorities or for any authority or other person to whom the competent authority ESMA has delegated tasks, including auditors and experts contracted by the competent authority. ESMA. Information covered by professional secrecy shall not be disclosed to another person or authority except where such disclosure is necessary for legal proceedings.
2. All the information that, under this Regulation, is acquired by, or exchanged between CESR and between, ESMA, the competent authorities, the sectoral competent authorities or other authorities and between competent authorities under this Regulation bodies referred to in Article 27(2), shall be considered confidential, except where CESR ESMA or the competent authority or other authority or body concerned states at the time of communication that such information may be disclosed or where such disclosure is necessary for legal proceedings.
DELETED ±0 Art. 33§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata and the amending act's instructions found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +313 −75 Art. 34 Agreement on exchange of information§
applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)
dates added to the text: 2000-12-18
The authority empowered to conclude cooperation agreements on exchange of information with third-country authorities changes from the competent authorities to ESMA, and the counterpart authorities are described as supervisory authorities rather than competent authorities.
The purpose clause for such information exchange is broadened to cover the performance of the tasks of ESMA in addition to those of the third-country supervisory authorities.
The rule on transfer of personal data to a third country now names ESMA as the applying party and replaces the reference to Directive 95/46/EC with a reference to Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of 18 December 2000.
Cited: Art. 34, v1 · Art. 34, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 34
Agreement on exchange of information
The competent authorities ESMA may conclude cooperation agreements on exchange of information with the competent supervisory authorities of third countries only if the information disclosed is subject to guarantees of professional secrecy which are at least equivalent to those set out in Article 32.
Such exchange of information shall be intended for the performance of the tasks of ESMA or those competent supervisory authorities.
With regard to transfer of personal data to a third country, Member States ESMA shall apply Directive 95/46/EC. Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such dataOJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1..
MODIFIED +75 −80 Art. 35 Disclosure of information from third countries§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
The text now names ESMA as the actor that may disclose the information received, rather than the competent authority of a Member State.
The information is described as received from supervisory authorities of third countries instead of competent authorities of third countries, and the express agreement must now be obtained by ESMA or a competent authority from the supervisory authority that transmitted the information, rather than by the disclosing competent authority from the transmitting competent authority.
Cited: Art. 35, v1 · Art. 35, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 35
Disclosure of information from third countries
The competent authority of a Member State ESMA may disclose the information received from competent supervisory authorities of third countries only if it ESMA or a competent authority has obtained the express agreement of the competent supervisory authority that has transmitted the information and, where applicable, the information is disclosed only for the purposes for which that competent supervisory authority gave its agreement, agreement or where such disclosure is necessary for legal proceedings.
MODIFIED +46 −61 Art. 36 Penalties§
applies from: unchanged
The scope of the penalty rules narrows from covering infringements of the Regulation generally to covering infringements of Article 4(1) specifically.
The authority responsible for disclosing imposed penalties changes from the competent authority to the sectoral competent authority, and the disclosure obligation is likewise limited to infringements of Article 4(1) rather than infringements of the Regulation as a whole.
Cited: Art. 36, v1 · Art. 36, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 36
Penalties
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation Article 4(1) and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Member States shall ensure that the sectoral competent authority disclose to the public every penalty that has been imposed for infringement infringements of this Regulation, Article 4(1), unless such disclosure would seriously jeopardise the financial markets or cause disproportionate damage to the parties involved.
By 7 December 2010 the Member States shall notify the rules referred to in the first subparagraph to the Commission. They shall notify the Commission without delay of any subsequent amendment thereto.
INSERTED +4,336 −0 Art. 36a Fines§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
A new Article 36a is added, setting out a system of fines for credit rating agencies found by ESMA's Board of Supervisors to have intentionally or negligently committed infringements listed in Annex III.
It fixes basic fine ranges tied to specific points of Annex III sections, ties the position within each range to the agency's annual turnover, and provides for adjustment of the basic amount using aggravating or mitigating coefficients from Annex IV.
It also caps any fine at 20% of the agency's preceding-year turnover, requires the fine to be at least equal to any financial benefit gained from the infringement, and states that where one act or omission constitutes more than one infringement only the higher calculated fine applies.
Cited: Art. 36a, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 36a Fines 1. Where, in accordance with Article 23e(5), ESMA's Board of Supervisors finds that a credit rating agency has, intentionally or negligently, committed one of the infringements listed in Annex III, it shall adopt a decision imposing a fine in accordance with paragraph 2. An infringement by a credit rating agency shall be considered to have been committed intentionally if ESMA finds objective factors which demonstrate that the credit rating agency or its senior management acted deliberately to commit the infringement. 2. The basic amount of the fines referred to in paragraph 1 shall be included within the following limits: (a) for infringements referred to in points 1 to 5, 11 to 15, 19, 20, 23, 28, 30, 32, 33, 35, 41, 43, 50 and 51 of Section I of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 500000 and shall not exceed EUR 750000; (b) for the infringements referred to in points 6 to 8, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 29, 31, 34, 37 to 40, 42, 45 to 47, 48, 49, 52 and 54 of Section I of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 300000 and shall not exceed EUR 450000; (c) for the infringements referred to in points 9, 10, 26, 36, 44 and 53 of Section I of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 100000 and shall not exceed EUR 200000; (d) for the infringements referred to in points 1, 6, 7 and 8 of Section II of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 50000 and shall not exceed EUR 150000; (e) for the infringements referred to in points 2, 4 and 5 of Section II of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 25000 and shall not exceed EUR 75000; (f) for the infringements referred to in point 3 of Section II of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 10000 and shall not exceed EUR 50000; (g) for the infringements referred to in points 1 to 3 and 11 of Section III of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 150000 and shall not exceed EUR 300000; (h) for the infringements referred to in points 4, 6, 8 and 10 of Section III of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 90000 and shall not exceed EUR 200000; (i) for the infringements referred to in points 5, 7 and 9 of Section III of Annex III, the fines shall amount to at least EUR 40000 and shall not exceed EUR 100000. In order to decide whether the basic amount of the fines should be set at the lower, the middle or the higher end of the limits set out in the first subparagraph, ESMA shall have regard to the annual turnover in the preceding business year of the credit rating agency concerned. The basic amount shall be at the lower end of the limit for credit rating agencies whose annual turnover is below EUR 10 million, the middle of the limit for the credit rating agencies whose annual turnover is between EUR 10 and 50 million and the higher end of the limit for the credit rating agencies whose annual turnover is higher than EUR 50 million. 3. The basic amounts defined within the limits set out in paragraph 2 shall be adjusted, if need be, by taking into account aggravating or mitigating factors in accordance with the relevant coefficients set out in Annex IV. The relevant aggravating coefficient shall be applied one by one to the basic amount. If more than one aggravating coefficient is applicable, the difference between the basic amount and the amount resulting from the application of each individual aggravating coefficient shall be added to the basic amount. The relevant mitigating coefficient shall be applied one by one to the basic amount. If more than one mitigating coefficient is applicable, the difference between the basic amount and the amount resulting from the application of each individual mitigating coefficient shall be subtracted from the basic amount. 4. Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 and 3, the fine shall not exceed 20 % of the annual turnover of the credit rating agency concerned in the preceding business year and, where the credit rating agency has directly or indirectly benefitted financially from the infringement, the fine shall be at least equal to that financial benefit. Where an act or omission of a credit rating agency constitutes more than one infringement listed in Annex III, only the higher fine calculated in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 and related to one of those infringements shall apply.
INSERTED +1,575 −0 Art. 36b Periodic penalty payments§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
Article 36b is a wholly new provision setting out periodic penalty payments, empowering ESMA's Board of Supervisors to impose such payments by decision to compel compliance with earlier decisions on infringements, information requests, investigations, or on-site inspections.
It further specifies that the payment must be effective and proportionate, imposed daily until compliance, calculated at 3% of average daily turnover (or 2% of average daily income for natural persons) from a date stated in the imposing decision, and limited to a maximum period of six months after notification.
Cited: Art. 36b, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 36b Periodic penalty payments 1. ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall by decision impose a periodic penalty payment in order to compel: (a) a credit rating agency to put an end to an infringement, in accordance with a decision taken pursuant to point (d) of Article 24(1); (b) a person referred to in Article 23b(1) to supply complete information which has been required by a decision pursuant to Article 23b; (c) a person referred to in Article 23b(1) to submit to an investigation and in particular to produce complete records, data, procedures or any other material required and to complete and correct other information provided in an investigation launched by a decision taken pursuant to Article 23c; (d) a person referred to in Article 23b(1) to submit to an on-site inspection ordered by a decision taken pursuant to Article 23d. 2. A periodic penalty payment shall be effective and proportionate. The periodic penalty payment shall be imposed on a daily basis until the credit rating agency or person concerned complies with the relevant decision referred to in paragraph 1. 3. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the amount of a periodic penalty payment shall be 3 % of the average daily turnover in the preceding business year or, in the case of natural persons, 2 % of the average daily income in the preceding calendar year. It shall be calculated from the date stipulated in the decision imposing the periodic penalty payment. 4. A periodic penalty payment may be imposed for a period of no more than six months following the notification of ESMA's decision.
INSERTED +865 −0 Art. 36c Hearing of the persons subject to the proceedings§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This provision is entirely new, adding Article 36c which sets out a right for persons subject to proceedings to be heard by ESMA's Board of Supervisors on ESMA's findings before a fine or periodic penalty payment decision is taken under Article 36a or points (a) to (d) of Article 36b(1), with decisions to be based only on findings the persons have had a chance to comment on.
It also adds a second paragraph stating that the rights of defence of the persons subject to the proceedings are to be fully respected, granting them access to ESMA's file subject to other persons' legitimate interest in protecting business secrets, while excluding confidential information or ESMA's internal preparatory documents from that access.
Cited: Art. 36c, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 36c Hearing of the persons subject to the proceedings 1. Before taking any decision imposing a fine and/or periodic penalty payment under Article 36a or points (a) to (d) of Article 36b(1), ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall give the persons subject to the proceedings the opportunity to be heard on ESMA's findings. ESMA's Board of Supervisors shall base its decisions only on findings on which the persons subject to the proceedings have had the opportunity to comment. 2. The rights of defence of the persons subject to the proceedings shall be fully respected during the proceedings. They shall be entitled to have access to ESMA's file, subject to the legitimate interest of other persons in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information or internal preparatory documents of ESMA.
INSERTED +1,623 −0 Art. 36d Disclosure, nature, enforcement and allocation of fines and periodic penalty payments§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This is a new provision setting out that ESMA must disclose to the public fines and periodic penalty payments imposed under Articles 36a and 36b, unless disclosure would seriously jeopardise financial markets or cause disproportionate damage to the parties involved.
It further states that such fines and periodic penalty payments are administrative in nature, are enforceable under the civil procedure rules of the Member State where enforcement occurs, and may only have enforcement suspended by a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union, while national courts retain jurisdiction over complaints of irregular enforcement.
The new text also provides that the amounts collected from these fines and periodic penalty payments are allocated to the general budget of the European Union.
Cited: Art. 36d, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 36d Disclosure, nature, enforcement and allocation of fines and periodic penalty payments 1. ESMA shall disclose to the public every fine and periodic penalty payment that has been imposed pursuant to Articles 36a and 36b, unless such disclosure to the public would seriously jeopardise the financial markets or cause disproportionate damage to the parties involved. 2. Fines and periodic penalty payments imposed pursuant to Articles 36a and 36b shall be of an administrative nature. 3. Fines and periodic penalty payments imposed pursuant to Articles 36a and 36b shall be enforceable. Enforcement shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure in force in the State in the territory of which it is carried out. The order for its enforcement shall be appended to the decision without other formality than verification of the authenticity of the decision by the authority which the government of each Member State shall designate for that purpose and shall make known to ESMA and to the Court of Justice of the European Union. When those formalities have been completed on application by the party concerned, the latter may proceed to enforcement in accordance with the national law, by bringing the matter directly before the competent body. Enforcement may be suspended only by a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union. However, the courts of the Member State concerned shall have jurisdiction over complaints that enforcement is being carried out in an irregular manner. 4. The amounts of the fines and periodic penalty payments shall be allocated to the general budget of the European Union.
INSERTED +303 −0 Art. 36e Review by the Court of Justice of the European Union§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
A new Article 36e is added, granting the Court of Justice of the European Union unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions in which ESMA has imposed a fine or periodic penalty payment.
The provision further states that the Court may annul, reduce or increase the fine or periodic penalty payment imposed.
Cited: Art. 36e, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 36e Review by the Court of Justice of the European Union The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions whereby ESMA has imposed a fine or a periodic penalty payment. It may annul, reduce or increase the fine or periodic penalty payment imposed.
MODIFIED +172 −256 Art. 37 Amendments to Annexes§
applies from: unchanged
The provision now describes the Commission's power to amend the Annexes as being exercised through delegated acts adopted in accordance with Articles 38a, 38b and 38c, rather than through the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 38(2).
The reference to convergence of supervisory practice as a ground for amendment has been removed, and Annex III is now expressly excluded from the scope of measures amending the Annexes.
Cited: Art. 37, v1 · Art. 37, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02009R1060-20091207)
Article 37 Amendments to Annexes The Commission may amend the Annexes in order to take account of developments, including international developments, on financial markets, in particular in relation to new financial instruments and with regard to convergence of supervisory practice. Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 38(2).
after (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 37 Amendments to Annexes In order to take account of developments, including international developments, on financial markets, in particular in relation to new financial instruments, the Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a and subject to the conditions of Articles 38b and 38c, measures to amend the Annexes, excluding Annex III.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 38§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata and the amending act's instructions found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
INSERTED +840 −0 Art. 38a Exercise of the delegation§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
A new Article 38a is added, setting out that the Commission's power to adopt delegated acts under the specified provisions is conferred for a four-year period starting 1 June 2011, with a report due at least six months before that period ends and automatic extension unless revoked under Article 38b.
The new article also states that the Commission must notify the European Parliament and the Council simultaneously upon adopting a delegated act, and that the power to adopt such acts is subject to the conditions in Articles 38b and 38c.
Cited: Art. 38a, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 38a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 5(6), Article 19(2), Article 23e(7) and Article 37 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of four years from 1 June 2011. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegated power at the latest six months before the end of the four-year period. The delegation of power shall be automatically extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council revokes it in accordance with Article 38b. 2. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 3. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 38b and 38c.
INSERTED +872 −0 Art. 38b Revocation of the delegation§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This provision is entirely new, adding an Article 38b that sets out a procedure for the European Parliament or the Council to revoke the delegation of power referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 5(6), Article 19(2), Article 23e(7) and Article 37.
It further describes that the institution beginning an internal procedure to consider revocation is to try to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before a final decision, and that a revocation decision ends the specified delegation, takes effect immediately or on a later date stated in it, does not affect the validity of already-in-force delegated acts, and is to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Cited: Art. 38b, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 38b Revocation of the delegation 1. The delegation of power referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 5(6), Article 19(2), Article 23e(7) and Article 37 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. 2. The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of power shall endeavour to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated power which could be subject to revocation. 3. The decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect immediately or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of the delegated acts already in force. It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
INSERTED +1,139 −0 Art. 38c Objections to delegated acts§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This is a new article setting out a procedure by which the European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act within three months of notification, a period extendable by three months at either institution's initiative.
It further provides that if neither institution objects within that period the delegated act is published in the Official Journal and enters into force on the date stated in it, or earlier if both institutions have told the Commission they do not intend to object, whereas an objection from either institution within the period prevents the act from entering into force and requires the objecting institution to state its reasons.
Cited: Art. 38c, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 38c Objections to delegated acts 1. The European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act within a period of three months from the date of notification. At the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council that period shall be extended by three months. 2. If, on expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act, it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the date stated therein. The delegated act may be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force before the expiry of that period if the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission of their intention not to raise objections. 3. If either the European Parliament or the Council objects to the delegated act within the period referred to in paragraph 1, it shall not enter into force. In accordance with Article 296 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the institution which objects shall state the reasons for objecting to the delegated act.
MODIFIED +18 −26 Art. 39 Reports§
applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)
dates added to the text: 2011-07-01
The deadline in paragraph 3 for the Commission's report on third-country regulatory and supervisory developments was changed from 7 December 2010 to 1 July 2011.
Paragraph 3 also now refers to effects on the stability of financial markets in the Union rather than in the Community.
Cited: Art. 39, v1 · Art. 39, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 39
Reports
1. By 7 December 2012, the Commission shall make an assessment of the application of this Regulation, including an assessment of the reliance on credit ratings in the Community, the impact on the level of concentration in the credit rating market, the cost and benefit of impacts of the Regulation and of the appropriateness of the remuneration of the credit rating agency by the rated entity (issuer-pays model), and submit a report thereon to the European Parliament and the Council.
2. By 7 December 2010, the Commission shall, in the light of discussions with the competent authorities, assess the application of Title III of this Regulation, in particular of the cooperation of the competent authorities, the legal status of CESR and supervisory practices. The Commission shall present a report on those matters to the European Parliament and to the Council, accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals for a review of that Title.
That report shall include a reference to the Commission proposal of 12 November 2008 for a regulation on credit rating agencies and to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament of 23 March 2009 relating to that proposal.
3. By 7 December 2010, 1 July 2011, the Commission shall, in the light of developments in the regulatory and supervisory framework for credit rating agencies in third countries, present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council concerning the effects of those developments and of the transitional provisions referred to in Article 40 on the stability of financial markets in the Community. Union.
INSERTED +266 −0 Art. 39a Report by ESMA§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
A new Article 39a is added, requiring ESMA to assess the staffing and resource needs arising from taking on its powers and duties under the Regulation and to submit a report on that assessment to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Cited: Art. 39a, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 39a Report by ESMA By 31 December 2011, ESMA shall assess the staffing and resources needs arising from the assumption of its powers and duties in accordance with this Regulation and submit a report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
MODIFIED +31 −5 Art. 40 Transitional provision§
applies from: unchanged
The reference to those covered by Article 4(1) is expanded to include 'other entities' alongside financial institutions.
The cross-reference for what applies if registration is refused changes from Article 24(2) to Article 24(4) and (5).
Cited: Art. 40, v2 · Art. 40, v1
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
Article 40
Transitional provision
Credit rating agencies operating in the Community before 7 June 2010 (existing credit rating agencies), which intend to apply for registration under this Regulation, shall adopt all necessary measures to comply with its provisions by 7 September 2010.
Credit rating agencies shall submit their application for registration no earlier than 7 June 2010. Existing credit rating agencies shall submit their application for registration by 7 September 2010
Existing credit rating agencies may continue issuing credit ratings which may be used for regulatory purposes by the financial institutions and other entities referred to in Article 4(1) unless registration is refused. Where registration is refused, Article 24(2) 24(4) and (5) shall apply.
INSERTED +2,247 −0 Art. 40a Transitional measures related to ESMA§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This entire article is new, setting out transitional arrangements for shifting supervisory and enforcement competences over credit rating agencies from national competent authorities and colleges to ESMA, with the transfer of competences described as terminating on 1 July 2011, subject to an exception for registration applications received by 7 September 2010.
It also provides for the transfer of files and records to ESMA, for ESMA to act as legal successor in related proceedings, for existing registrations to remain valid, and for ESMA to carry out at least one verification of all credit rating agencies under its supervision by 1 July 2014.
Cited: Art. 40a, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
Article 40a Transitional measures related to ESMA 1. All competences and duties related to the supervisory and enforcement activity in the field of credit rating agencies, which were conferred on the competent authorities, whether acting as competent authorities of the home Member State or not, and on colleges where those have been established, shall be terminated on 1 July 2011. However, an application for registration that has been received by the competent authorities of the home Member State or the relevant college by 7 September 2010 shall not be transferred to ESMA, and the decision to register or refuse registration shall be taken by those authorities and the relevant college. 2. Without prejudice to the second subparagraph of paragraph 1, any files and working documents related to the supervisory and enforcement activity in the field of credit rating agencies, including any ongoing examinations and enforcement actions, or certified copies thereof, shall be taken over by ESMA on the date as referred to in paragraph 1. 3. The competent authorities and colleges referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure that any existing records and working papers, or certified copies thereof, shall be transferred to ESMA as soon as possible and in any event by 1 July 2011. Those competent authorities and colleges shall also render all necessary assistance and advice to ESMA to facilitate effective and efficient transfer and taking-up of supervisory and enforcement activity in the field of credit rating agencies. 4. ESMA shall act as the legal successor of the competent authorities and colleges referred to in paragraph 1 in any administrative or judicial proceedings that result from supervisory and enforcement activity pursued by those competent authorities and colleges in relation to matters that fall under this Regulation. 5. Any registration of a credit rating agency, in accordance with Chapter I of Title III, by a competent authority referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall remain valid after the transfer of competences to ESMA. 6. By 1 July 2014 and within the scope of its ongoing supervision, ESMA shall conduct at least one verification of all credit rating agencies falling under its supervisory competences.
MODIFIED ±0 Title§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the amending act's instructions found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED ±0 Title IV§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
MODIFIED +140 −89 Annex I INDEPENDENCE AND AVOIDANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
In Section A point 2 and Section B point 8, the availability of the independent board members' opinions and of the retained records is now directed to ESMA rather than to the competent authority of the Member States concerned.
In Section E, the annual disclosure list under point II.2 adds a new item requiring a list of credit ratings issued during the year showing the proportion of unsolicited ratings among them, and the wording of point (b) is adjusted accordingly with an added conjunction before the new point (c).
Cited: Annex I, v1 · Annex I, v2
text before / after
02009R1060-20091207 → 02009R1060-20110601
ANNEX I
INDEPENDENCE AND AVOIDANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Section A
Organisational requirements
1. The credit rating agency shall have an administrative or supervisory board. Its senior management shall ensure that:
(a) credit rating activities are independent, including from all political and economic influences or … 365 unchanged words … to in point 9 of this Section.
Opinions of the independent members of administrative or supervisory board issued on the matters referred to in points (a) to (d) shall be presented to the board periodically and shall be made available to the competent authority ESMA on request.
3. A credit rating agency shall establish adequate policies and procedures to ensure compliance with its obligations under this Regulation.
4. A credit rating agency shall have sound administrative and accounting procedures, internal control mechanisms, effective procedures for risk assessment, … 1,386 unchanged words … employees, that relate to credit rating activities.
8. Records and audit trails referred to in point 7 shall be kept at the premises of the registered credit rating agency for at least five years and be made available upon request to the competent authorities of the Member States concerned. ESMA.
Where the registration of a credit rating agency is withdrawn, the records shall be kept for an additional term of at least three years.
9. Records which set out the respective rights and obligations of the credit rating agency and the … 1,796 unchanged words … the main geographical areas of the issuers and whether the default rates of these categories have changed over time;
2. annually, the following information:
(a) a list of the largest 20 clients of the credit rating agency by revenue generated from them; and
(b) a list of those clients of the credit rating agency whose contribution to the growth rate in the generation of revenue of the credit rating agency in the previous financial year exceeded the growth rate in the total revenues of the credit rating agency in that year by a factor of more than 1,5 times. Any such client shall be included on the list only where, in that year, it accounted for more than 0,25 % of the worldwide total revenues of the credit rating agency at global level. level; and
(c) a list of credit ratings issued during the year, indicating the proportion of unsolicited credit ratings among them.
For the purposes of this point, client means an entity, its subsidiaries, and associated entities in which the entity has holdings of more than 20 %, as well as any other entities in respect of which it has negotiated the structuring of a debt issue on behalf of a client and where a fee was paid, directly or indirectly, to the credit rating agency for the rating of that debt issue.
III. Transparency report
A credit rating agency shall make available annually the following information:
1. detailed information on legal structure and ownership of the credit rating agency, including information on holdings within the meaning of Articles 9 and 10 of Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated marketOJ L 390, 31.12.2004, p. 38.;
2. a description of the internal control mechanisms ensuring quality of its credit rating activities;
3. statistics on the allocation of its staff to new credit ratings, credit rating reviews, methodology or model appraisal and senior management;
4. a description of its record-keeping policy;
5. the outcome of the annual internal review of its independent compliance function;
6. a description of its management and rating analyst rotation policy;
7. financial information on the revenue of the credit rating agency divided into fees from credit rating and non-credit-rating activities with a comprehensive description of each; and
8. a governance statement within the meaning of Article 46a(1) of Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 on the annual accounts of certain types of companiesOJ L 222, 14.8.1978, p. 11.. For the purposes of that statement, the information referred to in Article 46a(1)(d) of that Directive shall be provided by the credit rating agency irrespective of whether it is subject to Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bidsOJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p. 12..
MODIFIED ±0 Annex II§
applies from: unknown
Sources disagree — the amending act's instructions found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.
No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.
text before / after
No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.
INSERTED +22,690 −0 Annex III ANNEX III§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
This is a newly added Annex III, setting out a categorised list of infringements referred to in Article 24(1) and Article 36a(1), divided into three groups covering conflicts of interest and organisational or operational requirements, obstacles to supervisory activities, and disclosure provisions.
Each numbered item in the list describes a specific way a credit rating agency infringes a named article or annex provision, ranging from endorsement and independence requirements to record-keeping, methodology reviews, and disclosure obligations.
Cited: Annex III, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
ANNEX III List of infringements referred to in Article 24(1) and Article 36a(1) I. Infringements related to conflicts of interest, organisational or operational requirements 1. The credit rating agency infringes Article 4(3) by endorsing a credit rating issued in a third country without complying with the conditions set out in that paragraph, unless the reason for that infringement is outside the credit rating agency's knowledge or control. 2. The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 4(4) by using the endorsement of a credit rating issued in a third country with the intention of avoiding the requirements of this Regulation. 3. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 1 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing an administrative or a supervisory board. 4. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by not ensuring that its business interest does not impair the independence or accuracy of the credit rating activities. 5. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by appointing senior management which are not of good repute, sufficiently skilled or experienced, or cannot ensure the sound and prudent management of the credit rating agency. 6. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the third paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by not appointing the required number of independent members of its administrative or supervisory board. 7. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the fourth paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by setting up a compensation system for the independent members of its administrative or supervisory board which is linked to the business performance of the credit rating agency or is not arranged to ensure the independence of their judgment; or by setting a term of office for the independent members of its administrative or supervisory board for a period exceeding five years or for a renewable term; or by dismissing an independent member of the administrative or supervisory board other than in the case of misconduct or professional underperformance. 8. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the fifth paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by appointing members of the administrative or supervisory board that do not have sufficient expertise in financial services; or, where the credit rating agency issues credit ratings of structured finance instruments, by not appointing at least one independent member and one other member of the board who has in-depth knowledge and experience at senior level of the markets in structured finance instruments. 9. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the sixth paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by not ensuring that the independent members of the administrative or supervisory board perform the tasks of monitoring any of the matters referred to in the sixth paragraph of that point. 10. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the seventh paragraph of point 2 of Section A of Annex I, by not ensuring that the independent members of the administrative or supervisory board present their opinions on the matters referred to in the sixth paragraph of that point to the board periodically or make those opinions available to ESMA on request. 11. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 3 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing adequate policies or procedures to ensure compliance with its obligations under this Regulation. 12. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 4 of Section A of Annex I, by not having sound administrative or accounting procedures, internal control mechanisms, effective procedures for risk assessment, or effective control or safeguard arrangements for information processing systems; or by not implementing or maintaining decision-making procedures or organisational structures as required by that point. 13. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 5 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing or maintaining a permanent and effective compliance function department (compliance function) which operates independently. 14. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 6 of Section A of Annex I, by not ensuring that the conditions enabling the compliance function to discharge its responsibilities properly or independently, as set out in the first paragraph of that point, are satisfied. 15. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 7 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing appropriate and effective organisational or administrative arrangements to prevent, identify, eliminate or manage and disclose any conflicts of interest referred to in point 1 of Section B of Annex I, or by not arranging for records to be kept of all significant threats to the independence of the credit rating activities, including those to the rules on rating analysts referred to in Section C of Annex I, as well as the safeguards applied to mitigate those threats. 16. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 8 of Section A of Annex I, by not employing appropriate systems, resources or procedures to ensure continuity and regularity in the performance of its credit rating activities. 17. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 9 of Section A of Annex I, by not establishing a review function that: (a) is responsible for periodically reviewing its methodologies, models and key rating assumptions or any significant changes or modifications thereto, or the appropriateness of those methodologies, models or key rating assumptions where they are used or intended to be used for the assessment of new financial instruments; (b) is independent of the business lines which are responsible for credit rating activities; or (c) reports to the members of the administrative or supervisory board. 18. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 10 of Section A of Annex I, by not monitoring or evaluating the adequacy and effectiveness of its systems, internal control mechanisms and arrangements established in accordance with this Regulation or by not taking appropriate measures to address any deficiencies. 19. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 1 of Section B of Annex I, by not identifying, eliminating or managing and disclosing, clearly or prominently, any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may influence the analyses or judgments of its rating analysts, employees, or any other natural person whose services are placed at the disposal or under the control of the credit rating agency and who are directly involved in the issuing of a credit rating or persons approving credit ratings. 20. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 3 of Section B of Annex I, by issuing a credit rating in any of the circumstances set out in the first paragraph of that point or, in the case of an existing credit rating, by not disclosing immediately that the credit rating is potentially affected by those circumstances. 21. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 3 of Section B of Annex I, by not immediately assessing whether there are grounds for re-rating or withdrawing an existing credit rating. 22. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 4 of Section B of Annex I, by providing consultancy or advisory services to the rated entity or a related third party regarding the corporate or legal structure, assets, liabilities or activities of that rated entity or related third party. 23. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first part of the third paragraph of point 4 of Section B of Annex I, by not ensuring that the provision of an ancillary service does not present a conflict of interest with its credit rating activity. 24. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 5 of Section B of Annex I, by not ensuring that rating analysts or persons who approve ratings do not make proposals or recommendations regarding the design of structured finance instruments on which the credit rating agency is expected to issue a credit rating. 25. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 6 of Section B of Annex I, by not designing its reporting or communication channels so as to ensure the independence of the persons referred to in point 1 of Section B from the other activities of the credit rating agency carried out on a commercial basis. 26. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 8 of Section B of Annex I, by not keeping the records for a term of at least three years once its registration is withdrawn. 27. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(1) by not ensuring that rating analysts, its employees or any other natural person whose services are placed at its disposal or under its control and who are directly involved in credit rating activities have appropriate knowledge and experience for the duties assigned. 28. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(2) by not ensuring that a person referred to in Article 7(1) does not initiate or participate in negotiations regarding fees or payments with any rated entity, related third party or any person directly or indirectly linked to the rated entity by control. 29. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 3(a) of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section takes all reasonable measures to protect property or records in possession of the credit rating agency from fraud, theft or misuse, taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its credit rating activities. 30. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 5 of Section C of Annex I, by imposing negative consequences on a person referred to in point 1 of that Section where that person reports information to the compliance officer to the effect that another person as referred to in point 1 of that Section has engaged in conduct that he or she considers to be illegal. 31. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 6 of Section C of Annex I, by not reviewing the relevant work of a rating analyst over two years preceding his or her departure, where the rating analyst terminates his or her employment and joins a rated entity which he or she has been involved in rating or a financial firm, with which he or she has had dealings as part of his or her duties at the credit rating agency. 32. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 1 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in that point does not buy, sell or engage in a transaction in any financial instrument referred to in that point. 33. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 2 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not participate in or otherwise influence the determination of a credit rating as set out in point 2 of that Section. 34. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with points (b), (c) and (d) of point 3 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not disclose or use or share information, as referred to in those points. 35. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 4 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not solicit or accept money, gifts or favours from anyone with whom the credit rating agency does business. 36. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 7 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not take up a key management position with the rated entity or its related third party within six months of the credit rating. 37. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (a) of the first paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that the lead rating analyst is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or its related third parties for a period exceeding four years. 38. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (b) of the first paragraph of point 8 Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a rating analyst is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or its related third parties for a period exceeding five years. 39. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (c) of the first paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person approving credit ratings is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or its related third parties for a period exceeding seven years. 40. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of the first paragraph of that point is not involved in credit rating activities related to the rated entity or related third parties referred to in those points within two years of the end of the periods set out in those points. 41. The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(5) by introducing compensation or performance evaluation contingent on the amount of revenue that the credit rating agency derives from the rated entities or related third parties. 42. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(2) by not adopting, implementing or enforcing adequate measures to ensure that the credit ratings it issues are based on a thorough analysis of all the information that is available to it and that is relevant to its analysis according to its rating methodologies. 43. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(3) by not using rating methodologies that are rigorous, systematic, continuous and subject to validation based on historical experience, including back-testing. 44. The credit rating agency infringes the first subparagraph of Article 8(4) by refusing to issue a credit rating of an entity or a financial instrument because a portion of the entity or the financial instrument had been previously rated by another credit rating agency. 45. The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 8(4) by not recording all instances where in its credit rating process it departs from existing credit ratings prepared by another credit rating agency with respect to underlying assets or structured finance instruments or by not providing a justification for the differing assessment. 46. The credit rating agency infringes the first sentence of Article 8(5) by not monitoring its credit ratings or by not reviewing its credit ratings or methodologies on an ongoing basis and at least annually. 47. The credit rating agency infringes the second sentence of Article 8(5) by not establishing internal arrangements to monitor the impact of changes in macroeconomic or financial market conditions on credit ratings. 48. The credit rating agency infringes point (b) of Article 8(6), where methodologies, models or key rating assumptions used in credit rating activities are changed, by not reviewing the affected credit ratings in accordance with that point, or by not placing those ratings under observation in the meantime. 49. The credit rating agency infringes point (c) of Article 8(6) by not re-rating a credit rating that has been based on methodologies, models or key rating assumptions that are changed where the overall combined effect of those changes affects that credit rating. 50. The credit rating agency infringes Article 9 by undertaking the outsourcing of important operational functions in such a way as to impair materially the quality of the credit rating agency's internal control or the ability of ESMA to supervise the credit rating agency's compliance with obligations under this Regulation. 51. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 4 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, by issuing a credit rating or not withdrawing an existing rating in a case where the lack of reliable data or the complexity of the structure of a new type of financial instrument or the quality of information available is not satisfactory or raises serious questions as to whether the credit rating agency can provide a credible credit rating. 52. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(6) by using the name of ESMA or any competent authority in such a way that would indicate or suggest endorsement or approval by ESMA or any competent authority of the credit ratings or any credit rating activities of the credit rating agency. 53. The credit rating agency infringes Article 13 by charging a fee for the information provided in accordance with Articles 8 to 12. 54. The credit rating agency, where it is a legal person established in the Union, infringes Article 14(1) by not applying for registration for the purposes of Article 2(1). II. Infringements related to obstacles to the supervisory activities 1. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 7 of Section B of Annex I, by not arranging for records or audit trails of its credit rating activities as required by those provisions. 2. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 8 of Section B of Annex I, by not keeping the records or audit trails referred to in point 7 of that Section at its premises for at least five years or by not making available those records or audit trails to ESMA upon request. 3. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 9 of Section B of Annex I, by not retaining records which set out the respective rights and obligations of the credit rating agency or the rated entity or its related third parties under an agreement to provide credit rating services for the duration of the relationship with that rated entity or its related third party. 4. The credit rating agency infringes Article 11(2) by not making available the required information or by not providing that information in the required format as referred to in that paragraph. 5. The credit rating agency infringes Article 11(3), in conjunction with point 2 of Part I of Section E of Annex I, by not providing to ESMA a list of its ancillary services. 6. The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 14(3) by not notifying ESMA of any material changes to the conditions for initial registration in accordance with that subparagraph. 7. The credit rating agency infringes Article 23b(1) by providing incorrect or misleading information in response to a simple request for information pursuant to Article 23b(2) or in response to a decision requiring for information pursuant to Article 23b(3). 8. The credit rating agency infringes point (c) of Article 23c(1) by providing incorrect or misleading answers to questions asked pursuant to that point. III. Infringements related to disclosure provisions 1. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 2 of Section B of Annex I, by not disclosing to the public the names of the rated entities or related third parties from which it receives more than 5 % of its annual revenue. 2. The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the second part of the third paragraph of point 4 of Section B of Annex I, by not disclosing in the final rating report an ancillary service provided for the rated entity or any related third party. 3. The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(1) by not disclosing to the public the methodologies, models or key rating assumptions it uses in its credit rating activities as described in point 5 of Part I of Section E of Annex I. 4. The credit rating agency infringes point (a) of Article 8(6), where methodologies, models or key rating assumptions used in credit rating activities are changed, by not disclosing immediately, or by disclosing and not using the same means of communication as used for the distribution of the affected credit ratings, the likely scope of affected credit ratings. 5. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(1) by not disclosing on a non-selective basis or in a timely manner a decision to discontinue a credit rating, including full reasons for the decision. 6. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 1 or 2, the first paragraph of point 4 or point 5, of Part I of Section D of Annex I, or Part II of Section D of Annex I, by not providing the information as required by those provisions when presenting a rating. 7. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 3 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, by not informing the rated entity at least 12 hours before publication of the credit rating. 8. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(3) by not ensuring that rating categories that are attributed to structured finance instruments are clearly differentiated using an additional symbol which distinguishes them from rating categories used for any other entities, financial instruments or financial obligations. 9. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(4) by not disclosing its policies or procedures regarding unsolicited credit ratings. 10. The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(5) by not providing the information as required by that paragraph when issuing an unsolicited credit rating or by not identifying an unsolicited credit rating as such. 11. The credit rating agency infringes Article 11(1) by not fully disclosing or immediately updating information relating to the matters set out in Part I of Section E of Annex I.
INSERTED +2,070 −0 Annex IV ANNEX IV§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.
Annex IV is newly added, setting out coefficients tied to aggravating and mitigating factors that apply cumulatively to the basic amounts referenced in Article 36a(2).
It lists seven aggravating factors, each carrying its own numerical coefficient, followed by four mitigating factors with their own coefficients.
Cited: Annex IV, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02009R1060-20110601)
ANNEX IV List of the coefficients linked to aggravating and mitigating factors for the application of Article 36a(3) The following coefficients shall be applicable in a cumulative way to the basic amounts referred to in Article 36a(2) on the basis of each of the following aggravating and mitigating factors: I. Adjustment coefficients linked to aggravating factors 1. If the infringement has been committed repeatedly, for every time it has been repeated, an additional coefficient of 1,1 shall apply. 2. If the infringement has been committed for more than six months, a coefficient of 1,5 shall apply. 3. If the infringement has revealed systemic weaknesses in the organisation of the credit rating agency, in particular in its procedures, management systems or internal controls, a coefficient of 2,2 shall apply. 4. If the infringement has had a negative impact on the quality of the ratings rated by the credit rating agency concerned, a coefficient of 1,5 shall apply. 5. If the infringement has been committed intentionally, a coefficient of 2 shall apply. 6. If no remedial action has been taken since the breach has been identified, a coefficient of 1,7 shall apply. 7. If the credit rating agency’s senior management has not cooperated with ESMA in carrying out its investigations, a coefficient of 1,5 shall apply. II. Adjustment coefficients linked to mitigating factors 1. If the infringement relates to a breach listed in Section II or III of Annex III and has been committed for fewer than 10 working days, a coefficient of 0,9 shall apply. 2. If the credit rating agency’s senior management can demonstrate that they have taken all the necessary measures to prevent the infringement, a coefficient of 0,7 shall apply. 3. If the credit rating agency has brought quickly, effectively and completely the infringement to ESMA’s attention, a coefficient of 0,4 shall apply. 4. If the credit rating agency has voluntarily taken measures to ensure that similar infringement cannot be committed in the future, a coefficient of 0,6 shall apply.
The full entry, with the citation mapping v1 = 02009R1060-20091207, v2 = 02009R1060-20110601, is committed at eu/32009R1060/CHANGELOG.md.