emendrix

Benchmarks Regulation

32016R1011 · every event for this act · on EUR-Lex

Everything Regulation (EU) 2019/2175 amended · also amended MiFIR, ESMA Regulation, EIOPA Regulation, EBA Regulation

in force 2022-01-01

02016R1011-20210213 → 02016R1011-20220101

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2175 32019R2175

Regulation (EU) 2019/2175 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority), Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 on markets in financial instruments, Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds, and Regulation (EU) 2015/847 on information accompanying transfers of funds (Text with EEA relevance) (Text with EEA relevance)

detected 2026-08-13

35 provisions touched — 35 substantive, 0 date-only, 15 disputed · 1 change without an explanation

Emendrix checks every change against three independent sources. Where they disagree it says so rather than picking a winner.

MODIFIED +68 −29 Art. 3 Definitions

applies from: unchanged

In point (24)(a) of Article 3(1)(1), the word "directly" was removed from the description of how input data is contributed, so the text now reads that data is contributed entirely from the listed sources rather than entirely and directly from them.

In point (24)(a)(vii), the reference to outsourced data collection under Article 10 now adds an exception for point (f) of Article 10(3), and the requirement that the service provider receive the data "directly" from an entity referred to in points (i) to (vi) was likewise dropped, with the qualifier "of this point" added after that cross-reference.

Cited: Art. 3, v1 · Art. 3, v2

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 3 Definitions 1. For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply: (1) index means any figure: (a) that is published or made available to the public; (b) that is regularly determined: (i) entirely or partially by the application of a formula or any … 1,747 unchanged words … objectives of the Paris Agreement by reducing Scope 1, 2 and 3 carbon emissions as referred to in point (1)(e) of Annex III; (24) regulated-data benchmark means a benchmark determined by the application of a formula from: (a) input data contributed entirely and directly from: (i) a trading venue as defined in point (24) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU or a trading venue in a third country for which the Commission has adopted an implementing decision that the legal and supervisory framework of that … 358 unchanged words … and of the Council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowances trading within the Community (OJ L 302, 18.11.2010, p. 1).; (vii) a service provider to which the benchmark administrator has outsourced the data collection in accordance with Article 10, with the exception of point (f) of Article 10(3), provided that the service provider receives the data entirely and directly from an entity referred to in points (i) to (vi); (vi) of this point; (b) net asset values of investment funds; (25) critical benchmark means a benchmark other than a regulated-data benchmark that fulfils any of the conditions laid down in Article 20(1) and which is on the list established by the Commission pursuant to that Article; (26) significant benchmark means a benchmark that fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 24(1); (27) non-significant benchmark means a benchmark that does not fulfil the conditions laid down in Articles 20(1) and 24(1); (28) located means, in relation to a legal person, the country where that person's registered office or other official address is situated and, in relation to a natural person, the country where that person is resident for tax purposes; (29) public authority means: (a) any government or other public administration, including the entities charged with or intervening in the management of the public debt; (b) any entity or person either performing public administrative functions under national law or having public responsibilities or functions or providing public services, including measures of employment, economic activities and inflation, under the control of an entity within the meaning of point (a). 2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 in order to specify further technical elements of the definitions laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article, in particular specifying what constitutes making available to the public for the purposes of the definition of an index. Where applicable, the Commission shall take into account the market or technological developments and the international convergence of supervisory practice in relation to benchmarks. 3. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts in order to establish and review a list of public authorities in the Union falling within the definition under point (29) of paragraph 1 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 50(2). Where applicable, the Commission shall take into account the market or technological developments and the international convergence of supervisory practice in relation to benchmarks.

MODIFIED +501 −0 Art. 4 Governance and conflict of interest requirements

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2020-10-01

The after text adds a new paragraph 9, which is not present in the before text, directing ESMA to develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying requirements to ensure that the governance arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 are sufficiently robust.

This new paragraph 9 also states that ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 October 2020, and that power is delegated to the Commission to adopt them in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

All other paragraphs of Article 4 remain textually identical between the two versions.

Cited: Art. 4, v2 · Art. 4, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 4 Governance and conflict of interest requirements 1. An administrator shall have in place robust governance arrangements which include a clear organisational structure with well-defined, transparent and consistent roles and responsibilities for all persons involved in the provision of a benchmark. Administrators … 574 unchanged words … information may affect the benchmark. 8. An administrator shall establish specific internal control procedures to ensure the integrity and reliability of the employee or person determining the benchmark, including at least internal sign-off by management before the dissemination of the benchmark.9. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the requirements to ensure that the governance arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 are sufficiently robust. ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 October 2020. Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

MODIFIED +513 −0 Art. 12 Methodology

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2020-10-01

A new paragraph 4 has been added, directing ESMA to develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying conditions ensuring the methodology under paragraph 1 complies with points (a) to (e) of that paragraph.

This added paragraph also states that ESMA shall submit those draft standards to the Commission by 1 October 2020, and that the Commission is empowered to adopt them under Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

Paragraphs 1 to 3 remain unchanged between the two versions.

Cited: Art. 12, v2 · Art. 12, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 12 Methodology 1. An administrator shall use a methodology for determining a benchmark that: (a) is robust and reliable; (b) has clear rules identifying how and when discretion may be exercised in the determination of that benchmark; (c) is rigorous, continuous and capable of validation including, where appropriate, back-testing against available transaction data; (d) is resilient and ensures that the benchmark can be calculated in the widest set of possible circumstances, without compromising its integrity; (e) is traceable and verifiable. 2. When developing a benchmark methodology, a benchmark administrator shall: (a) take into account factors including the size and normal liquidity of the market, the transparency of trading and the positions of market participants, market concentration, market dynamics, and the adequacy of any sample to represent the market or economic reality that the benchmark is intended to measure; (b) determine what constitutes an active market for the purposes of that benchmark; and (c) establish the priority given to different types of input data. 3. An administrator shall have in place clear published arrangements that identify the circumstances in which the quantity or quality of input data falls below the standards necessary for the methodology to determine the benchmark accurately and reliably, and that describe whether and how the benchmark is to be calculated in such circumstances.4. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the conditions to ensure that the methodology referred to in paragraph 1 complies with points (a) to (e) of that paragraph. ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 October 2020. Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

MODIFIED +465 −0 Art. 14 Reporting of infringements

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2020-10-01

A new paragraph 4 is added requiring ESMA to develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the characteristics of the systems and controls referred to in paragraph 1, and to submit those draft standards to the Commission by 1 October 2020.

The added paragraph also states that power is delegated to the Commission to supplement the Regulation by adopting those regulatory technical standards in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

Paragraphs 1 through 3 are unchanged between the two versions.

Cited: Art. 14, v2 · Art. 14, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 14 Reporting of infringements 1. An administrator shall establish adequate systems and effective controls to ensure the integrity of input data in order to be able to identify and report to the competent authority any conduct that may involve manipulation or attempted manipulation of a benchmark, under Regulation (EU) No 596/2014. 2. An administrator shall monitor input data and contributors in order to be able to notify the competent authority and provide all relevant information where the administrator suspects that, in relation to a benchmark, any conduct has taken place that may involve manipulation or attempted manipulation of the benchmark, under Regulation (EU) No 596/2014, including collusion to do so. The competent authority of the administrator shall, where applicable, transmit such information to the relevant authority under Regulation (EU) No 596/2014. 3. Administrators shall have procedures in place for their managers, employees and any other natural persons whose services are placed at their disposal or under their control to report internally infringements of this Regulation.4. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the characteristics of the systems and controls referred to in paragraph 1. ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 October 2020. Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

MODIFIED +480 −0 Art. 20 Critical benchmarks

applies from: unchanged

A new paragraph 1a is inserted, under which ESMA, when it considers that a benchmark fulfils all the criteria set out in point (c) of paragraph 1, submits a documented request to the Commission to recognise that benchmark as critical.

The added paragraph further provides that after receiving this request the Commission adopts an implementing act in accordance with paragraph 1, and that ESMA reviews its assessment of the benchmark's criticality at least every two years, notifying and transmitting the assessment to the Commission.

This paragraph 1a did not appear in the earlier version of Article 20.

Cited: Art. 20, v2 · Art. 20, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 20 Critical benchmarks 1. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 50(2) to establish and review at least every two years a list of benchmarks provided by administrators located within the Union … 398 unchanged words … After receiving the assessment, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act in accordance with this paragraph. In addition, in the event of disagreement, the competent authority of the administrator shall transmit its assessment to ESMA, which may publish an opinion. 1a. Where ESMA considers that a benchmark fulfils all of the criteria set out in point (c) of paragraph 1, it shall submit a documented request to the Commission to recognise that benchmark as critical. After receiving that documented request, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act in accordance with paragraph 1. ESMA shall review its assessment of the criticality of the benchmark at least every two years and shall notify and transmit the assessment to the Commission. 2. Where the competent authority of a Member State referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 considers that an administrator under its supervision provides a benchmark that should be recognised as critical, it shall notify ESMA and transmit to … 505 unchanged words … discontinuity or unreliability of the benchmark on market integrity, financial stability, consumers, the real economy, or the financing of households and businesses in one or more Member States. Where applicable, the Commission shall take into account relevant market or technological developments.

MODIFIED +580 −81 Art. 21 Mandatory administration of a critical benchmark

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2020-10-01

Paragraph 2(1)(a) removes the qualifier limiting notification to the college established under Article 46 to cases 'where applicable', and point (b) now ties the four-week deadline to the receipt of the assessment rather than simply stating a four-week period.

Paragraph 2's second subparagraph now bars the administrator from ceasing provision without the written consent of ESMA or the competent authority, where relevant, instead of only the competent authority's consent as before.

A new paragraph 5 is added requiring ESMA to develop draft regulatory technical standards on the criteria for the paragraph 2(b) assessment and to submit them to the Commission by 1 October 2020, with power delegated to the Commission to adopt them under Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

Cited: Art. 21, v1 · Art. 21, v2

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 21 Mandatory administration of a critical benchmark 1. If an administrator of a critical benchmark intends to cease providing such benchmark, the administrator shall: (a) immediately notify its competent authority; and (b) within four weeks of such notification submit an assessment of how the benchmark: (i) is to be transitioned to a new administrator; or (ii) is to be ceased to be provided, taking into account the procedure established in Article 28(1). During the period referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph, the administrator shall not cease provision of the benchmark. 2. Upon receipt of the assessment of by the administrator referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority shall: (a) inform ESMA and, where applicable, and the college established under Article 46; and (b) within four weeks, weeks following the receipt of that assessment, make its own assessment of how the benchmark is to be transitioned to a new administrator or be ceased to be provided, taking into account the procedure established in accordance with Article 28(1). During the period of time referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph, subparagraph, the administrator shall not cease the provision of the benchmark without the written consent of ESMA or the competent authority. authority, where relevant. 3. Following completion of the assessment referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2, the competent authority shall have the power to compel the administrator to continue publishing the benchmark until such time as: (a) the provision of the benchmark has been transitioned to a new administrator; (b) the benchmark can be ceased to be provided in an orderly fashion; or (c) the benchmark is no longer critical. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, the period for which the competent authority may compel the administrator to continue to publish the benchmark shall not exceed 12 months. By the end of that period, the competent authority shall review its decision to compel the administrator to continue to publish the benchmark. The competent authority may, where necessary, extend that period by an appropriate period not exceeding 12 months. The maximum period of mandatory administration shall not exceed five years. 4. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, in the event that the administrator of a critical benchmark is to be wound down due to insolvency proceedings, the competent authority shall make an assessment of whether and how the critical benchmark can be transitioned to a new administrator or can cease to be provided in an orderly fashion, taking into account the procedure established in accordance with Article 28(1).5. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the criteria on which the assessment referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2 is to be based. ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 October 2020. Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

MODIFIED +289 −299 Art. 23 Mandatory contribution to a critical benchmark

applies from: unchanged

Paragraph 3 restructures the notification chain: the supervised contributor now notifies the administrator directly, the administrator informs its own competent authority without undue delay, and that competent authority in turn informs the competent authority of the supervised contributor and, where applicable, ESMA, replacing the earlier wording where the administrator's competent authority informed the contributor's competent authority only if located in another Member State.

Paragraph 4 changes the phrasing of who is informed and when, now stating that the competent authority of the administrator informs ESMA or the college established under Article 46 promptly and on the basis of the assessment makes its own assessment, rather than the earlier text listing the college as informed alongside ESMA and treating the assessment step separately.

Cited: Art. 23, v1 · Art. 23, v2

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 23 Mandatory contribution to a critical benchmark 1. This Article shall apply to critical benchmarks based on submissions by contributors the majority of which are supervised entities. 2. Administrators of one or more critical benchmarks shall, every two years, submit to their competent authority an assessment of the capability of each critical benchmark they provide to measure the underlying market or economic reality. 3. If a A supervised contributor to a critical benchmark that intends to cease contributing input data, it data shall promptly notify the administrator thereof in writing the benchmark administrator, which writing. The administrator shall thereupon inform without undue delay its competent authority. Where the supervised contributor is located in another Member State, the The competent authority of the critical benchmark administrator shall inform, without delay, inform the competent authority of that contributor. supervised contributor, and where applicable ESMA, thereof without undue delay. The benchmark administrator shall submit to its competent authority an assessment of the implications on the capability of the critical benchmark to measure the underlying market or economic reality reality, as soon as possible but no later than 14 days after the notification made by the supervised contributor. 4. Upon receipt of an the assessment of the benchmark administrator referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article and on the basis of such assessment, Article, the competent authority of the administrator shall shall, where applicable, promptly inform ESMA and, where applicable, or the college established under Article 46, 46 and shall on the basis of that assessment make its own assessment on of the capability of the benchmark to measure the underlying market and economic reality, taking into account the administrator's administrator’s procedure for cessation of the benchmark established in accordance with Article 28(1). 5. From the date on which the competent authority of the administrator is notified of the intention of a contributor to cease contributing input data and until such time … 762 unchanged words … the competent authority of the administrator shall have the power to require input data in accordance with paragraph 5, and points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 6, of this Article only from supervised contributors located in its Member State.

MODIFIED +515 −0 Art. 26 Non-significant benchmarks

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2020-10-01

A new paragraph 6 is added, directing ESMA to develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the criteria under which competent authorities may require changes to the compliance statement mentioned in paragraph 4, with submission to the Commission by 1 October 2020, and delegating power to the Commission to supplement the Regulation by adopting those standards under Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

Paragraphs 1 through 5 remain unchanged between the two versions.

Cited: Art. 26, v2 · Art. 26, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 26 Non-significant benchmarks 1. An administrator may choose not to apply Articles 4(2), points (c), (d) and (e) of Article 4(7), Articles 4(8), 5(2), 5(3), 5(4), 6(1), 6(3), 6(5), 7(2), point (b) of Article 11(1), points (b) and (c) of Article 11(2), and Articles 11(3), 13(2), 14(2), 15(2), 16(2) and (3) with respect to its non-significant benchmarks. 2. An administrator shall immediately notify its competent authority when the administrator's non-significant benchmark exceeds the threshold mentioned in point (a) of Article 24(1). In that case, it shall comply with the requirements applicable to significant benchmarks within three months. 3. Where an administrator of a non-significant benchmark chooses not to apply one or more of the provisions referred to in paragraph 1, it shall publish and maintain a compliance statement which shall clearly state why it is appropriate for that administrator not to comply with those provisions. The administrator shall provide the compliance statement to its competent authority. 4. The relevant competent authority shall review the compliance statement referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article. The competent authority may also request additional information from the administrator in respect of its non-significant benchmarks in accordance with Article 41 and may require changes to ensure compliance with this Regulation. 5. ESMA shall develop draft implementing technical standards to develop a template for the compliance statement referred to in paragraph 3. ESMA shall submit the draft implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph to the Commission by 1 April 2017. Power is conferred to the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.6. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the criteria under which competent authorities may require changes to the compliance statement as referred to in paragraph 4. ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 October 2020. Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

MODIFIED +2,187 −2 Art. 30 Equivalence

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2015-05-20

The after text adds new subparagraphs to paragraphs 2 and 3 allowing the Commission to make application of an equivalence implementing decision conditional on a third country's ongoing fulfilment of conditions aimed at equivalent supervisory and regulatory standards and on ESMA's ability to exercise its monitoring responsibilities under Article 33 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

New paragraphs 2a and 3a are introduced empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts under Article 49 specifying the conditions referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraphs 2 and 3 respectively, neither of which appear in the earlier version.

Paragraph 4 is expanded so that, when establishing cooperation arrangements, ESMA must take into account whether a third country appears on the list of jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing deficiencies identified under a delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2015/849, a consideration absent from the earlier text.

Cited: Art. 30, v2 · Art. 30, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 30 Equivalence 1. In order for a benchmark or a combination of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country to be used in the Union in accordance with Article 29(1), the benchmark and the administrator shall be included in the register referred to in Article 36. The following conditions shall be complied with in order to be included in the register: (a) an equivalence decision is adopted by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 2 or 3 of this Article; (b) the administrator is authorised or registered, and is subject to supervision, in the third country in question; (c) ESMA is notified by the administrator of its consent that its actual or prospective benchmarks may be used by supervised entities in the Union, of the list of the benchmarks for which they have given consent to be used in the Union and of the competent authority responsible for its supervision in the third country; and (d) the cooperation arrangements referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article are operational. 2. The Commission may adopt an implementing decision stating that the legal framework and supervisory practice of a third country ensures that: (a) administrators authorised or registered in that third country comply with binding requirements which are equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, in particular taking account of whether the legal framework and supervisory practice of a third country ensures compliance with the IOSCO principles for financial benchmarks or, where applicable, with the IOSCO principles for PRAs; and (b) the binding requirements are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an on-going basis in that third country. The Commission may subject the application of the implementing decision referred to in the first subparagraph to the effective fulfilment by that third country of any condition, aiming at ensuring equivalent supervisory and regulatory standards, set out in that implementing decision on an ongoing basis and to the ability of ESMA to effectively exercise the monitoring responsibilities referred to in Article 33 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. Such implementing decision shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 50(2). 2a. The Commission may adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 49 to specify the conditions referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 of this Article. 3. Alternatively, the Commission may adopt an implementing decision stating that: (a) binding requirements in a third country with respect to specific administrators or specific benchmarks or families of benchmarks are equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, in particular taking account of whether the legal framework and supervisory practice of a third country ensures compliance with the IOSCO principles for financial benchmarks or, where applicable, with the IOSCO principles for PRAs; and (b) such specific administrators or specific benchmarks or families of benchmarks are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an on-going basis in that third country. The Commission may subject the application of the implementing decision referred to in the first subparagraph to the effective fulfilment by that third country of any condition, aiming at ensuring equivalent supervisory and regulatory standards, set out in that implementing decision on an ongoing basis and to the ability of ESMA to effectively exercise the monitoring responsibilities referred to in Article 33 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. Such implementing decision shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 50(2). 3a. The Commission may adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 49 to specify the conditions referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 3 of this Article. 4. ESMA shall establish cooperation arrangements with the competent authorities of third countries whose legal framework and supervisory practices have been recognised as equivalent in accordance with paragraph 2 or 3. 3 of this Article. When establishing those arrangements, ESMA shall take into account whether a third country in question is, in accordance with a delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilDirective (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (OJ L 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73)., on the list of jurisdictions which have strategic deficiencies in their national anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism regimes that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union. Such arrangements shall specify at least: (a) the mechanism for the exchange of information between ESMA and the competent authorities of third countries concerned, including access to all relevant information regarding the administrator authorised in that third country that is requested by ESMA; (b) the mechanism for prompt notification to ESMA where a third country competent authority deems that the administrator authorised in that third country that it is supervising is in breach of the conditions of its authorisation or other national legislation in the third country; (c) the procedures concerning the coordination of supervisory activities, including on-site inspections. 5. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to determine the minimum content of the cooperation arrangements referred to in paragraph 4 so as to ensure that the competent authorities and ESMA are able to exercise all their supervisory powers under this Regulation. ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 April 2017. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

MODIFIED +383 −995 Art. 32 Recognition of an administrator located in a third country

applies from: unchanged

The recognition, verification and suspension/withdrawal functions previously performed by the competent authority of the Member State of reference are now performed by ESMA, including receipt of applications, checking that conditions in paragraphs 2 and 3 (rather than 2, 3 and 4) are met, and operating cooperation arrangements and supervisory functions vis-à-vis the third-country competent authority.

Paragraph 3 no longer requires the legal representative to be established in the Member State of reference and instead ties its accountability to ESMA rather than to the competent authority.

Paragraph 8 is restructured from a single sentence into three separate lettered grounds (a), (b) and (c) for suspension or withdrawal, now attributed to ESMA rather than to the competent authority of the Member State of reference.

Cited: Art. 32, v1 · Art. 32, v2

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 32 Recognition of an administrator located in a third country 1. Until such time as an equivalence decision is adopted in accordance with Article 30(2) or (3) is adopted, and (3), a benchmark provided by an administrator located in a third country may be used by supervised entities in the Union Union, provided that the that administrator acquires prior recognition by the competent authority of its Member State of reference ESMA in accordance with this Article. 2. An administrator located in a third country intending to obtain prior recognition as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall comply with the requirements established in this Regulation, excluding Article 11(4) and Articles 16, 20, 21 and 23. The administrator may fulfil that condition by applying the IOSCO principles for financial benchmarks or the IOSCO principles for PRAs, as applicable, provided that such application is equivalent to compliance with the requirements established in this Regulation, excluding Article 11(4), and Articles 16, 20, 21 and 23. For the purposes of determining To determine whether the condition referred to in the first subparagraph is fulfilled, fulfilled and in order to assess compliance with the IOSCO principles for financial benchmarks or the IOSCO principles for PRAs, as applicable, the competent authority of the Member State of reference ESMA may rely on take into account an assessment by an independent external auditor or, where the administrator located in a third country is subject to supervision, on the certification provided by the competent authority of the administrator in the third country where the administrator is located. If, and to the extent that, an administrator is able to demonstrate that a benchmark it provides is a regulated-data benchmark or a commodity benchmark that is not based on submissions by contributors the majority of which are supervised entities, there shall be no obligation on the administrator to comply with requirements not applicable to the provision of regulated-data benchmarks and of commodity benchmarks as provided for in Article 17 and Article 19(1) respectively. 3. An administrator located in a third country intending to obtain prior recognition as referred to in paragraph 1 shall have a legal representative established in its Member State of reference. representative. The legal representative shall be a natural or legal person located in the Union, Union and which, expressly appointed by the that administrator located in a third country, acts to act on behalf of such that administrator vis-à-vis the authorities and any other person in the Union with regard to the administrator's administrator’s obligations under this Regulation. The legal representative shall shall, together with the administrator, perform the oversight function relating to the provision of benchmarks performed by the administrator under this Regulation together with the administrator and, in that respect, shall be accountable to the competent authority of the Member State of reference. ESMA. 4. The Member State of reference of an administrator located in a third country shall be determined as follows: (a) where an administrator is part of a group that contains one supervised entity located in the Union, the Member State of … 400 unchanged words … entity, the Member State of reference shall be the Member State where such supervised entity is located. 5. An administrator located in a third country intending to obtain prior recognition as referred to in paragraph 1 shall apply for recognition with the competent authority of its Member State of reference. ESMA. The applicant administrator shall provide all information necessary to satisfy the competent authority ESMA that it has established, at the time of recognition, all the necessary arrangements to meet the requirements referred to in paragraph 2 and shall provide the list of its actual or prospective benchmarks which may be used are intended for use in the Union and shall, where applicable, indicate the competent authority in the third country responsible for its supervision in the third country. supervision. Within 90 working days of receipt of the application referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the competent authority ESMA shall verify that the conditions laid down in paragraphs 2, 2 and 3 and 4 are fulfilled. If the competent authority Where ESMA considers that the conditions laid down in paragraphs 2, 2 and 3 and 4 are not fulfilled, it shall refuse the recognition request and set out the reasons for that refusal. In addition, no recognition shall be granted unless the following additional conditions are fulfilled: (a) where an administrator located in a third country is subject to supervision, an appropriate cooperation arrangement is in place between the competent authority of the Member State of reference ESMA and the competent authority of the third country where the administrator is located, in compliance with the regulatory technical standards adopted pursuant to Article 30(5), in order to ensure an efficient exchange of information that allows enables the competent authority of that third country to carry out its duties in accordance with this Regulation; (b) the effective exercise by the competent authority ESMA of its supervisory functions under this Regulation is neither prevented by the laws, regulations or administrative provisions of the third country where the administrator is located, nor, where applicable, by limitations in the supervisory and investigatory powers of that third country's supervisory country’s competent authority. 6. In the event that the competent authority of the Member State of reference considers that an administrator located in a third country provides a benchmark that fulfils the conditions of a significant or non-significant benchmark, as provided for in Articles 24 and 26 respectively, it shall, without undue delay, notify ESMA thereof. It shall support such assessment with the information provided by the administrator in the relevant application for recognition. Within one month of receipt of the notification referred to in the first subparagraph, ESMA shall issue advice to the competent authority about the type of the benchmark and the requirements applicable to its provision, as provided for in Articles 24, 25 and 26. The advice may, in particular, address whether ESMA considers that the conditions for such type are fulfilled on the basis of the information provided by the administrator in the application for recognition. The period of time referred to in paragraph 5 shall be suspended from the date on which the notification is received by ESMA, until such time as ESMA issues advice in accordance with this paragraph. If the competent authority of the Member State of reference proposes to grant recognition contrary to ESMA's advice referred to in the second subparagraph, it shall inform ESMA thereof, stating its reasons. ESMA shall publish the fact that the competent authority does not comply or intend to comply with that advice. ESMA may also decide, on a case-by-case basis, to publish the reasons provided by the competent authority for not complying with that advice. The competent authority concerned shall receive advance notice of such publication. 7. The competent authority of the Member State of reference shall notify ESMA of any decision to recognise an administrator located in a third country within five working days, along with the list of the benchmarks provided by the administrator which may be used in the Union and, where applicable, the competent authority responsible for its supervision in the third country. 8. The competent authority of the Member State of reference ESMA shall suspend or, where appropriate, withdraw the recognition granted in accordance with paragraph 5 if where it has well-founded reasons, based on documented evidence, to consider that the administrator administrator: (a) is acting in a manner which is clearly prejudicial to the interests of users of its benchmarks or to the orderly functioning of markets or the administrator markets; (b) has seriously infringed the relevant requirements set out in this Regulation, or that the administrator Regulation; (c) made false statements or used any other irregular means to obtain the recognition. 9. ESMA may develop draft regulatory technical standards to determine the form and content of the application referred to in paragraph 5 and, in particular, the presentation of the information required in paragraph 6. In the event that such draft regulatory technical standards are developed, ESMA shall submit them to the Commission. Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

MODIFIED +222 −0 Art. 34 Authorisation and registration of an administrator

applies from: unchanged

A new paragraph 1a is inserted, providing that where one or more of the indices provided by the person referred to in paragraph 1 would qualify as critical benchmarks as referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 20(1), the application is addressed to ESMA rather than to the competent authority.

The remainder of Article 34, including paragraphs 1 through 8, is unchanged between the two versions.

Cited: Art. 34, v2 · Art. 34, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 34 Authorisation and registration of an administrator 1. A natural or legal person located in the Union that intends to act as an administrator shall apply to the competent authority designated under Article 40 of the Member State in which that person is located in order to receive: (a) authorisation if it provides or intends to provide indices which are used or intended to be used as benchmarks within the meaning of this Regulation; (b) registration if it is a supervised entity, other than an administrator, that provides or intends to provide indices which are used or intended to be used as benchmarks within the meaning of this Regulation, on condition that the activity of provision of a benchmark is not prevented by the sectoral discipline applying to the supervised entity and that none of the indices provided would qualify as a critical benchmark; or (c) registration if it provides or intends to provide only indices which would qualify as non-significant benchmarks. 1a. Where one or more of the indices provided by the person referred to in paragraph 1 would qualify as critical benchmarks as referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 20(1), the application shall be addressed to ESMA. 2. An authorised or registered administrator shall comply at all times with the conditions laid down in this Regulation and shall notify the competent authority of any material changes thereof. 3. The application referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made … 356 unchanged words … the Commission by 1 April 2017. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

MODIFIED +319 −65 Art. 40 Competent authorities

applies from: unchanged

A new paragraph 1 was inserted naming ESMA as the competent authority for administrators of critical benchmarks referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 20(1) and for administrators of the benchmarks referred to in Article 32.

The remaining content on Member States designating a competent authority, on handling multiple designated authorities, and on ESMA's publication of the list was kept but renumbered from paragraphs 1 to 3 into paragraphs 2 to 4, with cross-references to those paragraph numbers updated accordingly.

Cited: Art. 40, v2 · Art. 40, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 40 Competent authorities 1. For the purposes of this Regulation, ESMA shall be the competent authority for: (a) administrators of critical benchmarks as referred to in points (a) and supervised entities, each (c) of Article 20(1); (b) administrators of the benchmarks referred to in Article 32. 2. Each Member State shall designate the relevant competent authority responsible for carrying out the duties under this Regulation and shall inform the Commission and ESMA thereof. 2. Where a 3. A Member State that designates more than one competent authority, it authority in accordance with paragraph 2 shall clearly determine their the respective roles of those competent authorities and shall designate a single authority to be responsible for coordinating the cooperation and the exchange of information with the Commission, ESMA and other Member States' States’ competent authorities. 3. 4. ESMA shall publish on its website a list of the competent authorities designated in accordance with paragraphs 1 2 and 2. 3.

MODIFIED +71 −12 Art. 41 Powers of competent authorities

applies from: unchanged

In paragraph 1, the phrase describing competent authorities is changed to specify "competent authorities referred to in Article 40(2)" rather than simply "competent authorities".

In paragraph 2, the opening phrase is similarly changed to "The competent authorities referred to in Article 40(2)" in place of "Competent authorities", with the word "of this Article and" retained but the comma before "in accordance with their national legal frameworks" removed.

Cited: Art. 41, v2 · Art. 41, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 41 Powers of competent authorities 1. In order to fulfil their duties under this Regulation, competent authorities referred to in Article 40(2) shall have, in conformity with national law, at least the following supervisory and investigatory powers: (a) access to any document and other data in any form, and to receive or take a copy thereof; (b) require or demand information from any person involved in the provision of, and contribution to, a benchmark, including any service provider to which functions, services or activities in the provision of a benchmark have been outsourced as provided for in Article 10, as well as their principals, and if necessary, summon and question any such person with a view to obtaining information; (c) request, in relation to commodity benchmarks, information from contributors on related spot markets according, where applicable, to standardised formats and reports on transactions, and direct access to traders' systems; (d) carry out on-site inspections or investigations, at sites other than the private residences of natural persons; (e) enter premises of legal persons, without prejudice to Regulation (EU) No 596/2014, in order to seize documents and other data in any form, where a reasonable suspicion exists that documents and other data related to the subject-matter of the inspection or investigation may be relevant to prove a breach of this Regulation. Where prior authorisation is needed from the judicial authority of the Member State concerned, in accordance with national law, such power shall only be used after having obtained that prior authorisation; (f) require existing recordings of telephone conversations, electronic communications or other data traffic records held by supervised entities; (g) request the freezing or sequestration of assets or both; (h) require temporary cessation of any practice that the competent authority considers contrary to this Regulation; (i) impose a temporary prohibition on the exercise of professional activity; (j) take all necessary measures to ensure that the public is correctly informed about the provision of a benchmark, including by requiring the relevant administrator or a person that has published or disseminated the benchmark or both to publish a corrective statement about past contributions to or figures of the benchmark. 2. Competent The competent authorities referred to in Article 40(2) shall exercise their functions and powers referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and the powers to impose sanctions referred to in Article 42, 42 in accordance with their national legal frameworks, in any of the following ways: (a) directly; (b) in collaboration with other authorities or with market undertakings; (c) under their responsibility by delegation to such authorities or to market undertakings; (d) by application to the competent judicial authorities. For the exercise of those powers, competent authorities shall have in place adequate and effective safeguards in regard to the right of defence and fundamental rights. 3. Member States shall ensure that appropriate measures are in place so that competent authorities have all the supervisory and investigatory powers that are necessary to fulfil their duties. 4. An administrator or any other supervised entity making information available to a competent authority in accordance with paragraph 1 shall not be considered to be in breach of any restriction on disclosure of information posed by any contractual, legislative, regulatory or administrative provision.

MODIFIED +58 −0 Art. 43 Exercise of supervisory powers and imposition of sanctions

applies from: unchanged

The text in Article 43(1) now specifies that the competent authorities referred to are those designated in accordance with Article 40(2), a phrase absent from the earlier version.

Cited: Art. 43, v2 · Art. 43, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 43 Exercise of supervisory powers and imposition of sanctions 1. Member States shall ensure that, when determining the type and level of administrative sanctions and other administrative measures, competent authorities that they have designated in accordance with Article 40(2) take into account all relevant circumstances, including where appropriate: (a) the gravity and duration of the infringement; (b) the criticality of the benchmark to financial stability and the real economy; (c) the degree of responsibility of the responsible person; (d) the financial strength of the responsible person, as indicated, in particular, by the total annual turnover of the responsible legal person or the annual income of the responsible natural person; (e) the level of the profits gained or losses avoided by the responsible person, insofar as they can be determined; (f) the level of cooperation of the responsible person with the competent authority, without prejudice to the need to ensure disgorgement of profits gained or losses avoided by that person; (g) previous infringements by the person concerned; (h) measures taken, after the infringement, by a responsible person to prevent the repetition of the infringement. 2. In the exercise of their powers to impose administrative sanctions and other administrative measures under Article 42, competent authorities shall cooperate closely to ensure that the supervisory and investigative powers and administrative sanctions and other administrative measures produce the desired results of this Regulation. They shall also coordinate their action in order to avoid possible duplication and overlap when applying supervisory and investigative powers and administrative sanctions, including pecuniary sanctions, and other administrative measures to cross-border cases.

MODIFIED +166 −264 Art. 44 Obligation to cooperate

applies from: unchanged

Paragraph 1 now specifies that the competent authorities referred to are those designated in accordance with Article 40(2) and (3), a detail not present in the earlier text, and it drops the earlier reference to fulfilling an obligation to cooperate with each other and ESMA for the purposes of the Regulation.

Paragraph 2 changes the description of competent authorities' duty toward other competent authorities and ESMA from providing assistance to assisting them, and it likewise now identifies these competent authorities as those designated under Article 40(2) and (3), rather than referring generally to competent authorities of other Member States.

Cited: Art. 44, v1 · Art. 44, v2

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 44 Obligation to cooperate 1. Where Member States that have chosen, in accordance with Article 42, chosen to lay down criminal sanctions for infringements of the provisions referred to in that Article, they Article 42 shall ensure that appropriate measures are in place so that the competent authorities designated in accordance with Article 40(2) and (3) have all the necessary powers to liaise with judicial authorities within their jurisdiction to receive specific information relating to criminal investigations or proceedings commenced for possible infringements of this Regulation. Those competent authorities shall provide that information to other competent authorities and ESMA, in order to fulfil their obligation to cooperate with each other and ESMA for the purposes of this Regulation. ESMA. 2. Competent authorities designated in accordance with Article 40(2) and (3) shall provide assistance to assist other competent authorities of other Member States. and ESMA. In particular, they shall exchange information and cooperate in any investigation or supervisory activities. Competent authorities may also cooperate with other competent authorities of other Member States with respect to facilitating facilitate the recovery of pecuniary sanctions.

MODIFIED +177 −22 Art. 45 Publication of decisions

applies from: unchanged

The wording of the reporting obligation is rephrased so that the annual timing is attached to the provision of aggregated information rather than to Member States' provision of it, and the exemption for investigatory measures is restated using 'shall not apply' instead of 'does not apply'.

ESMA's annual report is now required to also include aggregated information on all administrative sanctions and other administrative measures that ESMA itself has imposed pursuant to Article 48f, an addition not present in the earlier text.

Cited: Art. 45, v1 · Art. 45, v2

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 45 Publication of decisions 1. Subject to paragraph 2, a competent authority shall publish any decision imposing an administrative sanction or other administrative measure in relation to infringements of this Regulation on its official website immediately after the person subject to … 354 unchanged words … five years after its publication. Personal data contained in the publication shall only be kept on the official website of the competent authority for the period which is necessary in accordance with the applicable data protection rules. 5. Member States shall annually provide ESMA with aggregated information regarding all administrative sanctions and other administrative measures imposed pursuant to Article 42. 42 on an annual basis. That obligation does shall not apply to measures of an investigatory nature. ESMA shall publish that information in an annual report. report, together with aggregated information on all administrative sanctions and other administrative measures it has imposed pursuant to Article 48f. Where Member States have chosen, in accordance with Article 42, to lay down criminal sanctions for infringements of the provisions referred to in that Article, their competent authorities shall annually provide ESMA with anonymised and aggregated data regarding all criminal investigations undertaken and criminal sanctions imposed. ESMA shall publish data on criminal sanctions imposed in an annual report.

MODIFIED +116 −0 Art. 46 Colleges

applies from: unchanged

Paragraph 1 now specifies that it is the competent authority of the administrator that establishes the college, and adds that this authority also leads the college.

Paragraph 2 now describes the college as comprising representatives of the competent authority of the administrator and of the competent authorities of supervised contributors, and adds that ESMA is included unless it is itself the competent authority of the administrator.

Cited: Art. 46, v2

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 46 Colleges 1. Within 30 working days from the inclusion of a benchmark referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 20(1) in the list of critical benchmarks, with the exception of benchmarks where the majority of contributors are non-supervised entities, the competent authority of the administrator shall establish a college and lead the college. 2. The college shall comprise representatives of the competent authority of the administrator, ESMA, unless it is the competent authority of the administrator, and the competent authorities of supervised contributors. 3. Competent authorities of other Member States shall have the right to be members of the college where, if the critical benchmark in question were to cease to be provided, it would have a … 939 unchanged words … may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. The power of the competent authority of an administrator under Article 23(6) may be exercised until such time as ESMA publishes its decision.

MODIFIED +61 −0 Art. 47 Cooperation with ESMA

applies from: unchanged

Paragraphs 1 and 2 now specify that the competent authorities in question are those referred to in Article 40(2), a reference not present in the earlier version.

Paragraph 2 also changes the timing requirement for providing information to ESMA from 'without delay' to 'without undue delay'.

Cited: Art. 47, v2

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 47 Cooperation with ESMA 1. The competent authorities referred to in Article 40(2) shall cooperate with ESMA for the purposes of this Regulation, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. 2. The competent authorities referred to in Article 40(2) shall, without undue delay, provide ESMA with all information necessary to carry out its duties, in accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. 3. ESMA shall develop draft implementing technical standards to determine the procedures and forms for exchange of information as referred to in paragraph 2. ESMA shall submit the draft implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph to the Commission by 1 April 2017. Power is conferred to the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

INSERTED +270 −0 Art. 48a Exercise of the powers by ESMA

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

This new article states that powers given to ESMA, to any ESMA official, or to any other person authorised by ESMA under Articles 48b to 48d cannot be used to require disclosure of information or documents that are subject to legal privilege.

Cited: Art. 48a, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48a
Exercise of the powers by ESMA
The powers conferred on ESMA, on any official of ESMA or on any other person authorised by ESMA by Articles 48b to 48d shall not be used to require the disclosure of information or documents that are subject to legal privilege.

INSERTED +3,001 −0 Art. 48b Request for information

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

This article is entirely new, giving ESMA power to require specified persons, including benchmark contributors and related third parties, to supply information needed for its duties, either by simple request or by decision.

It sets out required contents for a simple request, including its legal basis, purpose, information sought, deadline, and a statement that response is voluntary but must not be incorrect or misleading, and separately sets out required contents for a decision, including the legal basis, purpose, information sought, deadline, applicable periodic penalty payments and fines, and appeal rights before ESMA's Board of Appeal and the Court of Justice.

It also addresses who must supply the information, including representatives and lawyers acting for clients, and requires ESMA to send a copy of the request or decision to the competent authority of the persons' Member State without undue delay.

Cited: Art. 48b, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48b
Request for information
1. ESMA may by simple request or by decision require the following persons to provide all necessary information to enable ESMA to carry out its duties under this Regulation:
(a) persons involved in the provision of benchmarks, as referred to in Article 40(1);
(b) third parties to whom the persons referred to in point (a) have outsourced functions or activities in accordance with Article 10;
(c) persons otherwise closely and substantially related or connected to the persons referred to in point (a).
In accordance with Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 and at the request of ESMA, competent authorities shall submit that request for information to contributors to critical benchmarks referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 20(1) of this Regulation and shall share the information received without undue delay with ESMA.
2. Any simple request for information as referred to paragraph 1 shall:
(a) refer to this Article as the legal basis of that request;
(b) state the purpose of that request;
(c) specify what information is required;
(d) include a time limit within which the information is to be provided;
(e) include a statement that there is no obligation on the person from whom the information is requested to provide that information but that in the event of a voluntary reply to the request, the information provided must not be incorrect or misleading;
(f) indicate the amount of the fine to be imposed in accordance with Article 48f where information provided is incorrect or misleading.
3. When requiring to supply information under paragraph 1 by decision, ESMA shall:
(a) refer to this Article as the legal basis of that request;
(b) state the purpose of that request;
(c) specify what information is required;
(d) set a time limit within which the information is to be provided;
(e) indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 48g where the required information is incomplete;
(f) indicate the fine provided for in Article 48f, where the answers to the questions asked are incorrect or misleading;
(g) indicate the right to appeal the decision before ESMA’s Board of Appeal and to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (Court of Justice) in accordance with Article 48k of this Regulation and Articles 60 and 61 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
4. The persons referred to in paragraph 1 or their representatives and, in the case of legal persons or associations having no legal personality, the persons authorised to represent them by law or by their constitution, shall supply the information requested. Lawyers duly authorised to act may supply the information on behalf of their clients. The latter shall remain fully responsible if the information supplied is incomplete, incorrect or misleading.
5. ESMA shall, without undue delay, send a copy of the simple request or of its decision to the competent authority of the Member State of the persons referred to in paragraph 1.

INSERTED +3,875 −0 Art. 48c General investigations

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

A new Article 48c has been added that sets out ESMA's power to conduct general investigations of persons referred to in Article 48b(1), including examining records, taking copies, summoning explanations, interviewing willing persons, and requesting telephone and data traffic records.

The article also details procedural requirements for such investigations, including written authorisation, the contents of ESMA decisions ordering investigations, cooperation with national competent authorities, and the conditions under which national judicial authorities review requests for telephone or data traffic records.

Cited: Art. 48c, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48c
General investigations
1. In order to carry out its duties under this Regulation, ESMA may conduct necessary investigations of the persons referred to in Article 48b(1). To that end, the officials and other persons authorised by ESMA shall be empowered to:
(a) examine any records, data, procedures and any other material relevant to the execution of its tasks, irrespective of the medium on which they are stored;
(b) take or obtain certified copies of or extracts from such records, data, procedures and other material;
(c) summon and ask any of those persons or their representatives, or staff, for oral or written explanations on facts or documents relating to the subject matter and purpose of the inspection, and to record the answers;
(d) interview any other natural or legal person who consents to be interviewed for the purpose of collecting information relating to the subject matter of an investigation;
(e) request records of telephone and data traffic.
2. The officials and other persons authorised by ESMA for the purposes of the investigations referred to in paragraph 1 shall exercise their powers upon production of a written authorisation specifying the subject matter and purpose of the investigation. That authorisation shall indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 48g where the production of the required records, data, procedures or any other material, or the answers to questions asked to the persons referred to in Article 48b(1) are not provided or are incomplete, and the fines provided for in Article 48f, where the answers to questions asked to those persons are incorrect or misleading.
3. The persons referred to in Article 48b(1) are required to submit to investigations launched on the basis of a decision of ESMA. The decision shall specify the subject matter and purpose of the investigation, the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 48g, the legal remedies available under Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 and the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice.
4. In good time before an investigation referred to in paragraph 1, ESMA shall inform the competent authority of the Member State where the investigation is to be carried out of the investigation and of the identity of the authorised persons. Officials of the competent authority concerned shall, at the request of ESMA, assist those authorised persons in carrying out their duties. Officials of the competent authority concerned may attend the investigations upon request.
5. If a request for records of telephone or data traffic referred to in point (e) of paragraph 1 requires authorisation from a national judicial authority according to applicable national law, such authorisation shall be applied for. Such authorisation may also be applied for as a precautionary measure.
6. Where a national judicial authority receives an application for the authorisation of a request for records of telephone or data traffic referred to in point (e) of paragraph 1 that authority shall verify the following:
(a) the decision referred to in paragraph 3 is authentic;
(b) any measures to be taken are proportionate and not arbitrary or excessive.
For the purposes of point (b), the national judicial authority may ask ESMA for detailed explanations, in particular relating to the grounds ESMA has for suspecting that an infringement of this Regulation has taken place and the seriousness of the suspected infringement and the nature of the involvement of the person subject to the coercive measures. However, the national judicial authority shall not review the necessity for the investigation or demand that it be provided with the information on ESMA’s file. The lawfulness of ESMA’s decision shall be subject to review only by the Court of Justice following the procedure set out in Article 61 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

INSERTED +4,316 −0 Art. 48d On-site inspections

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

A new Article 48d has been added, setting out ESMA's power to conduct on-site inspections at business premises of persons referred to in Article 48b(1), including procedures for notice, written authorisation, assistance from national competent authorities, and judicial authorisation requirements.

The provision also specifies the matters a national judicial authority must verify when asked to authorise such an inspection, and limits review of the lawfulness of ESMA's decision to the Court of Justice under the procedure in Article 61 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

Cited: Art. 48d, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48d
On-site inspections
1. In order to carry out its duties under this Regulation, ESMA may conduct all necessary on-site inspections at any business premises of the persons referred to in Article 48b(1).
2. The officials and other persons authorised by ESMA to conduct an on-site inspection may enter any business premises of the persons subject to an investigation decision adopted by ESMA and shall have all the powers stipulated in Article 48c(1). They shall have the power to seal any business premises and books or records for the period of, and to the extent necessary for, the inspection.
3. In sufficient time before the inspection, ESMA shall give notice of the inspection to the competent authority of the Member State where the inspection is to be conducted. Where the proper conduct and efficiency of the inspection so require, ESMA, after informing the relevant competent authority, may carry out the on-site inspection without prior notice. Inspections in accordance with this Article shall be conducted provided that the relevant authority has confirmed that it does not object to those inspections.
4. The officials and other persons authorised by ESMA to conduct an on-site inspection shall exercise their powers upon production of a written authorisation, specifying the subject matter and purpose of the inspection and the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 48g where the persons concerned do not submit to the inspection.
5. The persons referred to in Article 48b(1) shall submit to on-site inspections ordered by a decision of ESMA. That decision shall specify the subject matter and purpose of the inspection, the date on which it is to begin and indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 48g, the legal remedies available under Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 as well as the right to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice.
6. Officials of, as well as those authorised or appointed by, the competent authority of the Member State where the inspection is to be conducted, shall, at the request of ESMA, actively assist the officials and other persons authorised by ESMA. Officials of that competent authority may also attend the on-site inspections upon request.
7. ESMA may also require competent authorities to carry out specific investigatory tasks and on-site inspections as provided for in this Article and in Article 48c(1) on its behalf. To that end, competent authorities shall enjoy the same powers as ESMA as set out in this Article and in Article 48c(1).
8. Where the officials and other accompanying persons authorised by ESMA find that a person opposes an inspection ordered pursuant to this Article, the competent authority of the Member State concerned shall afford them the necessary assistance, requesting, where appropriate, the assistance of the police or of an equivalent enforcement authority, to enable them to conduct their on-site inspection.
9. If the on-site inspection provided for in paragraph 1 or the assistance provided for in paragraph 7 requires authorisation by a national judicial authority according to the applicable national law, such authorisation shall be applied for. Such authorisation may also be applied for as a precautionary measure.
10. Where a national judicial authority receives an application for the authorisation of an on-site inspection provided for in paragraph 1 or the assistance provided for in paragraph 7, that authority shall verify the following:
(a) the decision adopted by ESMA referred to in paragraph 5 is authentic;
(b) any measures to be taken are proportionate and not arbitrary or excessive.
For the purposes of point (b), the national judicial authority may ask ESMA for detailed explanations, in particular relating to the grounds ESMA has for suspecting that an infringement of this Regulation has taken place and the seriousness of the suspected infringement and the nature of the involvement of the person subject to the coercive measures. However, the national judicial authority shall not review the necessity of the investigation or demand that it be provided with the information on ESMA’s file. The lawfulness of ESMA’s decision shall be subject to review only by the Court of Justice following the procedure set out in Article 61 Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

INSERTED +2,643 −0 Art. 48e Supervisory measures by ESMA

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

Article 48e is a newly added provision setting out supervisory measures ESMA may take when it finds an infringement under point (a) of Article 42(1), including ordering the infringement to end, imposing fines, or issuing public notices.

It also lists criteria ESMA must weigh when choosing among those actions, and sets out notification and public disclosure requirements, including content that must appear in the public disclosure such as a statement of appeal rights and the possibility of suspension by ESMA's Board of Appeal.

Cited: Art. 48e, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48e
Supervisory measures by ESMA
1. Where, in accordance with Article 48i(5), ESMA finds that a person has committed one of the infringements listed in point (a) of Article 42(1), it shall take one or more of the following actions:
(a) adopt a decision requiring the person to bring the infringement to an end;
(b) adopt a decision imposing fines pursuant to Article 48f;
(c) issue public notices.
2. When taking the actions referred to in paragraph 1, ESMA shall take into account the nature and seriousness of the infringement, having regard to the following criteria:
(a) the duration and frequency of the infringement;
(b) whether financial crime has been occasioned, facilitated or otherwise attributable to the infringement;
(c) whether the infringement has been committed intentionally or negligently;
(d) the degree of responsibility of the person responsible for the infringement;
(e) the financial strength of the person responsible for the infringement, as indicated by the total turnover of the responsible legal person or the annual income and net assets of the responsible natural person;
(f) the impact of the infringement on retail investors’ interests;
(g) the importance of the profits gained, losses avoided by the person responsible for the infringement or the losses for third parties derived from the infringement, insofar as they can be determined;
(h) the level of cooperation of the person responsible for the infringement with ESMA, without prejudice to the need to ensure disgorgement of profits gained or losses avoided by that person;
(i) previous infringements by the person responsible for the infringement;
(j) measures taken after the infringement by the person responsible for the infringement to prevent its repetition.
3. Without undue delay, ESMA shall notify any action taken pursuant to paragraph 1 to the person responsible for the infringement, and shall communicate it to the competent authorities of the Member States and to the Commission. It shall publicly disclose any such action on its website within 10 working days from the date when it was adopted.
The disclosure to the public referred to in the first subparagraph shall include the following:
(a) a statement affirming the right of the person responsible for the infringement to appeal the decision;
(b) where relevant, a statement affirming that an appeal has been lodged and specifying that such an appeal does not have suspensive effect;
(c) a statement asserting that it is possible for ESMA’s Board of Appeal to suspend the application of the contested decision in accordance with Article 60(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

INSERTED +2,798 −0 Art. 48f Fines

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

This is a newly inserted provision setting out fines that ESMA may impose on a person found, intentionally or negligently, to have committed one of the infringements listed in point (a) of Article 42(1), including maximum amounts for legal and natural persons and rules for calculating those amounts and their aggregation across multiple infringements.

Cited: Art. 48f, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48f
Fines
1. Where, in accordance with Article 48i(5), ESMA finds that any person has, intentionally or negligently, committed one or more of the infringements listed in point (a) of Article 42(1), it shall adopt a decision imposing a fine in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article.
An infringement shall be considered to have been committed intentionally if ESMA finds objective factors which demonstrate that a person acted deliberately to commit the infringement.
2. The maximum amount of the fine referred to in paragraph 1 shall be:
(a) in the case of a legal person, EUR 1000000, or, in the Member States whose currency is not the euro, the corresponding value in the national currency on 30 June 2016, or 10 % of the total annual turnover of that legal person according to the last available financial statements approved by the management body, whichever is the higher;
(b) in the case of a natural person, EUR 500000, or, in the Member States whose currency is not the euro, the corresponding value in the national currency on 30 June 2016.
Notwithstanding the first subparagraph, the maximum amount of the fine for infringements of point (d) of Article 11(1) or of Article 11(4) shall be EUR 250000 or, in the Member States whose official currency is not the euro, the corresponding value in the national currency on 30 June 2016 or 2 % of the total annual turnover of that legal person according to the last available financial statements approved by the management body, whichever is the higher for legal persons, and EUR 100000 or, in the Member States whose official currency is not the euro, the corresponding value in the national currency on 30 June 2016 for natural persons.
For the purposes of point (a), where the legal person is a parent undertaking or a subsidiary of a parent undertaking which is required to prepare consolidated financial accounts in accordance with Directive 2013/34/EU, the relevant total annual turnover shall be the total annual turnover or the corresponding type of income in accordance with the relevant Union law in the area of accounting according to the last available consolidated accounts approved by the management body of the ultimate parent undertaking.
3. When determining the level of a fine pursuant to paragraph 1, ESMA shall take into account the criteria set out in Article 48e(2).
4. Notwithstanding paragraph 3, where the legal person has directly or indirectly benefited financially from the infringement, the amount of the fine shall be at least equal to that benefit.
5. Where an act or omission of a person constitutes more than one infringement listed in point (a) of Article 42(1), only the higher fine calculated in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article and relating to one of those infringements shall apply.

INSERTED +1,405 −0 Art. 48g Periodic penalty payments

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

Article 48g is newly added, setting out that ESMA may impose periodic penalty payments to compel a person to end an infringement or to comply with requests for information, investigations, or on-site inspections referenced in other articles.

The provision specifies that such payments must be effective and proportionate, imposed per day of delay, and calculated at 3% of average daily turnover (or 2% of average daily income for natural persons) from a date stated in the decision, for a maximum of six months after which ESMA reviews the measure.

Cited: Art. 48g, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48g
Periodic penalty payments
1. ESMA shall, by decision, impose periodic penalty payments to compel:
(a) a person to put an end to an infringement in accordance with a decision taken pursuant to point (a) of Article 48e(1);
(b) persons referred to in Article 48b(1):
(i) to supply complete information which has been requested by a decision pursuant to Article 48b;
(ii) to submit to an investigation and in particular to produce complete records, data, procedures or any other material required and to complete and correct other information provided in an investigation launched by a decision pursuant to Article 48c;
(iii) to submit to an on-site inspection ordered by a decision taken pursuant to Article 48d.
2. A periodic penalty payment shall be effective and proportionate. The periodic penalty payment shall be imposed for each day of delay.
3. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the amount of the periodic penalty payments shall be 3 % of the average daily turnover in the preceding business year, or, in the case of natural persons, 2 % of the average daily income in the preceding calendar year. It shall be calculated from the date stipulated in the decision imposing the periodic penalty payment.
4. A periodic penalty payment shall be imposed for a maximum period of six months following the notification of ESMA’s decision. Following the end of the period, ESMA shall review the measure.

INSERTED +1,621 −0 Art. 48h Disclosure, nature, enforcement and allocation of fines and periodic penalty payments

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

This is a newly inserted article setting out rules on disclosing, characterising, enforcing and allocating fines and periodic penalty payments imposed under Articles 48f and 48g.

It covers ESMA's public disclosure of such fines and penalty payments, the administrative nature of these measures, ESMA's duty to explain a decision not to impose them, their enforceability under the procedural rules of the Member State or third country where enforcement occurs, and the allocation of collected amounts to the general budget of the European Union.

Cited: Art. 48h, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48h
Disclosure, nature, enforcement and allocation of fines and periodic penalty payments
1. ESMA shall disclose to the public every fine and every periodic penalty payment that has been imposed pursuant to Articles 48f and 48g, unless such disclosure to the public would seriously jeopardise the financial markets or cause disproportionate damage to the parties involved. Such disclosure shall not contain personal data within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilRegulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39)..
2. Fines and periodic penalty payments imposed pursuant to Articles 48f and 48g shall be of an administrative nature.
3. Where ESMA decides not to impose any fines or penalty payments, it shall inform the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the competent authorities of the Member State concerned thereof and shall set out the reasons for its decision.
4. Fines and periodic penalty payments imposed pursuant to Articles 48f and 48g shall be enforceable.
Enforcement shall be governed by the rules of procedure in force in the Member State or third country in which it is carried out.
5. The amounts of the fines and the periodic penalty payments shall be allocated to the general budget of the European Union.

INSERTED +4,033 −0 Art. 48i Procedural rules for taking supervisory measures and imposing fines

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

This provision is newly inserted and sets out procedural rules covering the appointment of an independent investigation officer, the conduct of investigations, rights of access to the file, the decision-making process on infringements and fines, and referral of matters for criminal prosecution.

It also directs that delegated acts specifying rules of procedure for imposing fines or periodic penalty payments be adopted by a stated date.

Cited: Art. 48i, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48i
Procedural rules for taking supervisory measures and imposing fines
1. Where, in carrying out its duties under this Regulation, ESMA finds that there are serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in point (a) of Article 42(1), ESMA shall appoint an independent investigation officer within ESMA to investigate the matter. The appointed officer shall not be involved or have been directly or indirectly involved in the supervision of the benchmarks to which the infringement relates and shall perform his or her functions independently from ESMA’s Board of Supervisors.
2. The investigation officer referred to in paragraph 1 shall investigate the alleged infringements, take into account any comments submitted by the persons who are subject to the investigation, and shall submit a complete file with his or her findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors.
3. In order to carry out his or her tasks, the investigation officer shall have the power to request information in accordance with Article 48b and to conduct investigations and on-site inspections in accordance with Articles 48c and 48d.
4. Where carrying out those tasks, the investigation officer shall have access to all documents and information that have been gathered by ESMA in its supervisory activities.
5. Upon completion of his or her investigation and before submitting the file with his or her findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors, the investigation officer shall give the persons subject to the investigation the opportunity to be heard on the matters being investigated. The investigation officer shall base his or her findings only on facts on which the persons concerned have had the opportunity to comment.
6. The rights of the defence of the persons subject to the investigation shall be fully respected during investigations under this Article.
7. Upon submission of the file with his or her findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors, the investigation officer shall notify the persons who are subject to the investigation. The persons subject to the investigation shall be entitled to have access to the file, subject to the legitimate interest of other persons in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information affecting third parties.
8. On the basis of the file containing the investigation officer’s findings and, when requested by the persons concerned, after having heard those persons in accordance with Article 48j, ESMA shall decide if one or more of the infringements listed in point (a) of Article 42(1) has been committed by the persons subject to the investigation and, in such case, shall take a supervisory measure in accordance with Article 48e and impose a fine in accordance with Article 48f.
9. The investigation officer shall not participate in the deliberations of ESMA’s Board of Supervisors or in any other way intervene in the decision-making process of ESMA’s Board of Supervisors.
10. By 1 October 2021, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 to specify the rules of procedure for the exercise of the power to impose fines or periodic penalty payments, including provisions on rights of defence, temporal provisions, and the collection of fines or periodic penalty payments, and the limitation periods for the imposition and enforcement of fines and periodic penalty payments.
11. ESMA shall refer matters for criminal prosecution to the relevant national authorities where, in carrying out its tasks under this Regulation, it finds that there are serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute criminal offences. In addition, ESMA shall refrain from imposing fines or periodic penalty payments where a prior acquittal or conviction arising from an identical fact or facts which are substantially the same has already acquired the force of res judicata as the result of criminal proceedings under national law.

INSERTED +1,078 −0 Art. 48j Hearing of the persons subject to investigations

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

This is a new article establishing that before ESMA decides under Articles 48f, 48g or 48e, it must give persons subject to the proceedings a chance to be heard, basing its decisions only on findings those persons could comment on, with an exception allowing an interim decision plus later hearing where urgent action under Article 48e is needed to prevent significant and imminent damage to the financial system.

The new provision also states that the rights of defence of persons subject to the proceedings are to be fully respected, granting them access to ESMA's file subject to protection of other persons' business secrets, while excluding confidential information and ESMA's internal preparatory documents from that access.

Cited: Art. 48j, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48j
Hearing of the persons subject to investigations
1. Before taking any decision pursuant to Articles 48f, 48g and 48e, ESMA shall give the persons subject to the proceedings the opportunity to be heard on its findings. ESMA shall base its decisions only on findings on which the persons subject to the proceedings have had an opportunity to comment.
The first subparagraph shall not apply if urgent action pursuant to Article 48e is needed in order to prevent significant and imminent damage to the financial system. In such a case ESMA may adopt an interim decision and shall give the persons concerned the opportunity to be heard as soon as possible after taking its decision.
2. The rights of the defence of the persons subject to the proceedings shall be fully respected in the investigations. They shall be entitled to have access to ESMA’s file, subject to the legitimate interest of other persons in the protection of their business secrets. The right of access to the file shall not extend to confidential information or ESMA’s internal preparatory documents.

INSERTED +259 −0 Art. 48k Review by the Court of Justice

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

This is a new provision, Article 48k, giving the Court of Justice unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions by which ESMA has imposed a fine or a periodic penalty payment.

It states that the Court of Justice may annul, reduce or increase the fine or periodic penalty payment imposed.

Cited: Art. 48k, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48k
Review by the Court of Justice
The Court of Justice shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions whereby ESMA has imposed a fine or a periodic penalty payment. It may annul, reduce or increase the fine or periodic penalty payment imposed.

INSERTED +1,008 −0 Art. 48l Supervisory fees

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

This is a newly inserted Article 48l establishing that ESMA shall charge supervisory fees to administrators referred to in Article 40(1), with those fees covering ESMA's necessary expenditure on supervision and reimbursement of costs competent authorities incur under the Regulation.

The provision further states that an individual administrator's fee shall cover all administrative costs ESMA incurs for supervisory activities and shall be proportionate to that administrator's turnover, and it sets a deadline for the Commission to adopt delegated acts specifying fee types, matters, amounts and payment manner.

Cited: Art. 48l, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48l
Supervisory fees
1. ESMA shall charge fees to the administrators referred to in Article 40(1), in accordance with the delegated acts adopted pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article. Those fees shall fully cover ESMA’s necessary expenditure relating to the supervision of administrators and the reimbursement of any costs that the competent authorities may incur carrying out work pursuant to this Regulation in particular as a result of any delegation of tasks in accordance with Article 48m.
2. The amount of an individual fee charged to an administrator shall cover all administrative costs incurred by ESMA for its activities in relation to the supervision and it shall be proportionate to the turnover of the administrator.
3. By 1 October 2021, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 in order to supplement this Regulation by specifying the type of fees, the matters for which fees are due, the amount of the fees and the manner in which they are to be paid.

INSERTED +1,435 −0 Art. 48m Delegation of tasks by ESMA to competent authorities

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

Article 48m is newly added, setting out rules under which ESMA may delegate specific supervisory tasks to a Member State's competent authority, including information requests, investigations, and on-site inspections, while excluding delegation of the authorisation of critical benchmarks.

The new article also requires ESMA to consult the relevant competent authority before delegating a task, to reimburse costs of delegated tasks under a related delegated act, to periodically review and be able to revoke delegations, and states that delegation does not affect ESMA's own responsibility or oversight ability.

Cited: Art. 48m, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48m
Delegation of tasks by ESMA to competent authorities
1. Where necessary for the proper performance of a supervisory task, ESMA may delegate specific supervisory tasks to the competent authority of a Member State in accordance with the guidelines issued by ESMA pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. Such specific supervisory tasks may, in particular, include the power to carry out requests for information in accordance with Article 48b and to conduct investigations and on-site inspections in accordance with Article 48c and Article 48d.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the authorisation of critical benchmarks shall not be delegated.
2. Prior to the delegation of a task in accordance with paragraph 1, ESMA shall consult the relevant competent authority about:
(a) the scope of the task to be delegated;
(b) the timetable for the performance of the task; and
(c) the transmission of necessary information by and to ESMA.
3. In accordance with the delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 48l(3), ESMA shall reimburse a competent authority for costs incurred as a result of carrying out delegated tasks.
4. ESMA shall review any delegation made in accordance with paragraph 1 at appropriate intervals. A delegation may be revoked at any time.
5. A delegation of tasks shall not affect the responsibility of ESMA nor limit ESMA’s ability to conduct and oversee the delegated activity.

INSERTED +2,139 −0 Art. 48n Transition measures related to ESMA

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

This new article sets out transition measures shifting supervisory and enforcement competences and duties over administrators from national competent authorities to ESMA, effective 1 January 2022, along with the transfer of related files, working documents and records.

It also carves out an exception for certain authorisation and recognition applications received by competent authorities before 1 October 2021, which are to be decided by the relevant competent authority rather than transferred to ESMA, and it provides that ESMA becomes legal successor to those authorities in related proceedings while existing authorisations and recognitions remain valid after the transfer.

Cited: Art. 48n, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20220101)

Article 48n
Transition measures related to ESMA
1. All competences and duties related to the supervisory and enforcement activity regarding administrators as referred to in Article 40(1) that are conferred on competent authorities as referred to in Article 40(2) shall be terminated on 1 January 2022. Those competences and duties shall be taken-up by ESMA on the same date.
2. Any files and working documents related to the supervisory and enforcement activity regarding administrators as referred to in Article 40(1), including any ongoing examinations and enforcement actions, or certified copies thereof, shall be taken over by ESMA on the date referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
However, applications for authorisation by administrators of a critical benchmark referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 20(1) and applications for recognition in accordance with Article 32 that have been received by competent authorities before 1 October 2021 shall not be transferred to ESMA, and the decision to authorise or recognise shall be taken by the relevant competent authority.
3. Competent authorities shall ensure that any existing records and working papers, or certified copies thereof, shall be transferred to ESMA as soon as possible and in any event by 1 January 2022. Those competent authorities shall also render all necessary assistance and advice to ESMA to facilitate effective and efficient transfer and taking-up of supervisory and enforcement activity regarding administrators as referred to in Article 40(1).
4. ESMA shall act as the legal successor to the competent authorities referred to in paragraph 1 in any administrative or judicial proceedings that result from supervisory and enforcement activity pursued by those competent authorities in relation to matters that fall within the scope this Regulation.
5. Any authorisation of administrators of a critical benchmark as referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 20(1) and recognition in accordance with Article 32 granted by a competent authority referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall remain valid after the transfer of competences to ESMA.

MODIFIED +264 −11 Art. 49 Exercise of the delegation

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2019-12-30

A new paragraph 2a is added conferring the power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 30(2a), 30(3a), 48i(10) and 48l(3) on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from 30 December 2019.

Paragraph 3, on revocation of delegated powers, and paragraph 6, on the entry into force of delegated acts, are both expanded to list Articles 30(2a), 30(3a), 48i(10) and 48l(3) alongside the articles already named.

Cited: Art. 49, v2 · Art. 49, v1

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 49 Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 3(2), 13(2a), 19a(2), 19c(1), 20(6), 24(2), 27(2b), 33(7), 51(6) and 54(3) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from 10 December 2019. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power no later than 11 March 2024. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for further periods of identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. 2a. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 30(2a), 30(3a), 48i(10) and 48l(3) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from 30 December 2019. 2b. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 18a(3) and 54(7) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from 13 February 2021. 3. The delegations delegation of power referred to in Articles 3(2), 13(2a), 19a(2), 19c(1), 20(6), 24(2), 27(2b), 30(2a), 30(3a), 33(7), 48i(10), 48l(3), 51(6) and 54(3) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of power specified in that decision. It shall take effect on the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or on a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 3a. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 18a(3) and 54(7) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of power specified in that decision. It shall take effect on the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or on a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 3(2), 13(2a), 19a(2), 19c(1), 20(6), 24(2), 27(2b), 30(2a), 30(3a), 33(7), 48i(10), 48l(3), 51(6) or 54(3) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of three months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and to the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by three months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council. 6a. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 18a(3) or 54(7) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of three months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and to the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by three months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.

MODIFIED +125 −190 Art. 53 ESMA reviews

applies from: unchanged

References to Article 32 recognitions have been removed from paragraph 1, leaving ESMA's supervisory-culture goal and biennial review tied only to Article 33 endorsements, and the opinion ESMA issues to competent authorities is now limited to how they apply Article 33 rather than Articles 32 and 33.

Paragraph 2 now groups the evidence power with Article 51(2) and Article 25(2) decisions together, while treatment of Article 24(1) is rephrased to cover actions taken with regard to its enforcement rather than decisions adopted under it.

Cited: Art. 53, v1 · Art. 53, v2

text before / after

02016R1011-2021021302016R1011-20220101

Article 53 ESMA reviews 1. ESMA shall seek to build a common European supervisory culture and consistent supervisory practices and ensure consistent approaches among competent authorities in relation to the application of Articles 32 and Article 33. To that end, the recognitions granted in accordance with Article 32 and the endorsements authorised in accordance with Article 33 shall be reviewed by ESMA every two years. ESMA shall issue an opinion to each competent authority that has recognised a third country administrator or endorsed a third country third-country benchmark assessing how that competent authority applies the relevant requirements of Articles 32 and Article 33 respectively and the requirements of any relevant delegated act and regulatory or implementing technical standard standards based on this Regulation. 2. ESMA shall have the power to require the documented evidence from a competent authority for any of the decisions adopted in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 51(2), Article 24(1) 51(2) and Article 25(2). 25(2), as well as for actions taken with regard to the enforcement of Article 24(1).

MODIFIED ±0 TIS VI

applies from: unknown

Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.

No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.

text before / after

No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.

Back to top ↑

The full entry, with the citation mapping v1 = 02016R1011-20210213, v2 = 02016R1011-20220101, is committed at eu/32016R1011/CHANGELOG.md.