emendrix

Art. 11

Anti-Dumping Regulation · 32016R1036 · every event for this act · on EUR-Lex

Duration, reviews and refunds

2 changes recorded across 2 events, newest first.

in force 2018-06-08 MODIFIED+580 −12

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2018/825 32018R0825

applies from: unchanged

In paragraph 2, the list of evidence indicating a likelihood of continued or recurring dumping and injury now also mentions evidence of continued distortions on raw materials, alongside a minor wording change from 'would be likely to lead to' to 'would likely result in'.

Paragraph 5 gains a new subparagraph stating that if a measure expires following a paragraph 2 review, duties collected from the initiation of that investigation on customs-cleared goods are to be repaid where requested and granted by national customs authorities under applicable Union customs legislation, and that such repayment does not carry interest.

Cited: Art. 11, v2

text before / after

02016R1036-2017122002016R1036-20180608

Article 11 Duration, reviews and refunds 1. An anti-dumping measure shall remain in force only as long as, and to the extent that, it is necessary to counteract the dumping which is causing injury. 2. A definitive anti-dumping measure shall expire five years from its imposition or five years from the date of the conclusion of the most recent review which has covered both dumping and injury, unless it is determined in a review that the expiry would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Such an expiry review shall be initiated on the initiative of the Commission, or upon a request made by or on behalf of Union producers, and the measure shall remain in force pending the outcome of that review. An expiry review shall be initiated where the request contains sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Such likelihood may, for example, be indicated by evidence of continued dumping and injury or evidence that the removal of injury is partly or solely due to the existence of measures or evidence that the circumstances of the exporters, or market conditions, are such that they would indicate the likelihood of further injurious dumping. dumping, or by evidence of continued distortions on raw materials. In carrying out investigations under this paragraph, the exporters, importers, the representatives of the exporting country and the Union producers shall be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request, … 932 unchanged words … at the same time, or remain unchanged in investigations pursuant to paragraphs 3 and 4. A notice announcing the actual expiry or maintenance of the measures pursuant to this paragraph shall then be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. If, following an investigation pursuant to paragraph 2, the measure expires, any duties collected from the date of the initiation of such investigation on goods that were customs-cleared shall be repaid provided that this is requested from national customs authorities and granted by those authorities in accordance with the applicable Union customs legislation concerning repayment and remission of duty. Such repayment shall not give rise to the payment of interest by the national customs authorities concerned. 6. Reviews pursuant to this Article shall be initiated by the Commission. The Commission shall decide whether or not to initiate reviews pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 15(2). … 778 unchanged words … accordance with Article 2(9), it shall calculate it with no deduction for the amount of anti-dumping duties paid when conclusive evidence is provided that the duty is duly reflected in resale prices and the subsequent selling prices in the Union.

in force 2017-12-20 MODIFIED

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2321 32017R2321

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2017-12-19, 2017-12-20

New paragraphs were inserted into Article 11(3) and Article 11(4) stating that where existing anti-dumping measures are based on a normal value calculated under Article 2(7) as it stood on 19 December 2017, the methodology set out in Article 2(1) to (6a) replaces the original normal-value methodology only from the initiation of the first expiry review of those measures after that date, with the measures remaining in force pending the outcome of that review.

Article 11(9) gained an added paragraph requiring that, in relation to circumstances relevant to determining normal value under Article 2, due account be taken of all relevant evidence placed on the file, including relevant reports on conditions in the exporters' and producers' domestic market and the evidence underlying them, on which interested parties have had an opportunity to comment.

These additions do not appear in the earlier version of Article 11, which contained only the original text of paragraphs 3, 4 and 9.

Cited: Art. 11, v2 · Art. 11, v1

text before / after, on the event page →