emendrix

Benchmarks Regulation

32016R1011 · every event for this act · on EUR-Lex

Everything Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 amended

in force 2019-12-10

32016R1011 → 02016R1011-20191210

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 32019R2089

Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards EU Climate Transition Benchmarks, EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks and sustainability-related disclosures for benchmarks (Text with EEA relevance)

detected 2026-08-13

15 provisions touched — 15 substantive, 0 date-only, 6 disputed · 1 change without an explanation

Emendrix checks every change against three independent sources. Where they disagree it says so rather than picking a winner.

MODIFIED +1,823 −0 Art. 3 Definitions

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2016-10-05

Three new definitions, points (23a), (23b) and (23c), have been inserted between the existing commodity benchmark definition and the regulated-data benchmark definition.

Point (23a) defines an EU Climate Transition Benchmark by reference to a decarbonisation trajectory of the benchmark portfolio and construction in accordance with minimum standards to be laid down in delegated acts, point (23b) defines an EU Paris-aligned Benchmark by reference to carbon emissions alignment with the Paris Agreement objectives, construction under those same minimum standards, and a requirement that underlying-asset activities not significantly harm other ESG objectives, and point (23c) defines decarbonisation trajectory itself.

The earlier text, shown before the amendment, contained no such points and moved directly from the commodity benchmark definition to the regulated-data benchmark definition.

Cited: Art. 3, v2 · Art. 3, v1

text before / after

32016R101102016R1011-20191210

Article 3 Definitions 1. For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply: (1) index means any figure: (a) that is published or made available to the public; (b) that is regularly determined: (i) entirely or partially by the application of a formula or any … 1,424 unchanged words … transparency, admission of financial instruments to trading, and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive (OJ L 241, 2.9.2006, p. 1)., excluding emission allowances as referred to in point (11) of Section C of Annex I to Directive 2014/65/EU; (23a) EU Climate Transition Benchmark means a benchmark which is labelled as an EU Climate Transition Benchmark and fulfils the following requirements: (a) for the purposes of point 1(b)(ii) of this paragraph and of Article 19b, its underlying assets are selected, weighted or excluded in such a manner that the resulting benchmark portfolio is on a decarbonisation trajectory; and (b) it is constructed in accordance with the minimum standards laid down in the delegated acts referred to in Article 19a(2); (23b) EU Paris-aligned Benchmark means a benchmark which is labelled as an EU Paris-aligned Benchmark and fulfils the following requirements: (a) for the purposes of point 1(b)(ii) of this paragraph and of the delegated act referred to in Article 19c, its underlying assets are selected, weighted or excluded in such a manner that the resulting benchmark portfolio’s carbon emissions are aligned with the objectives of the Paris Agreement adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, approved by the Union on 5 October 2016Council Decision (EU) 2016/1841 of 5 October 2016 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Paris Agreement adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 1). (the Paris Agreement); (b) it is constructed in accordance with the minimum standards laid down in the delegated acts referred to in Article 19a(2); and (c) the activities relating to its underlying assets do not significantly harm other environmental, social and governance (ESG) objectives; (23c) decarbonisation trajectory means a measurable, science-based and time-bound trajectory towards alignment with the objectives of the Paris Agreement by reducing Scope 1, 2 and 3 carbon emissions as referred to in point (1)(e) of Annex III; (24) regulated-data benchmark means a benchmark determined by the application of a formula from: (a) input data contributed entirely and directly from: (i) a trading venue as defined in point (24) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU or a trading venue in … 708 unchanged words … Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 50(2). Where applicable, the Commission shall take into account the market or technological developments and the international convergence of supervisory practice in relation to benchmarks.

MODIFIED +647 −8 Art. 13 Transparency of methodology

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2020-04-30

A new point (d) is added to paragraph 1, requiring publication of an explanation of how the key methodology elements reflect ESG factors for each benchmark or family of benchmarks, excluding interest rate and foreign exchange benchmarks, with a stated compliance date of 30 April 2020 for that point.

A new paragraph 2a is inserted empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts under Article 49 to supplement the Regulation by setting the minimum content and standard format of the explanation referred to in the new point (d).

Paragraphs 1(a) through (c), paragraph 2, and paragraphs 3 and 4 remain otherwise unchanged from the earlier text.

Cited: Art. 13, v2 · Art. 13, v1

text before / after

32016R101102016R1011-20191210

Article 13 Transparency of methodology 1. An administrator shall develop, operate and administer the benchmark and methodology transparently. To that end, the administrator shall publish or make available the following information: (a) the key elements of the methodology that the administrator uses for each benchmark provided and published or, when applicable, for each family of benchmarks provided and published; (b) details of the internal review and the approval of a given methodology, as well as the frequency of such review; (c) the procedures for consulting on any proposed material change in the administrator's methodology and the rationale for such changes, including a definition of what constitutes a material change and the circumstances in which the administrator is to notify users of any such changes. changes; (d) an explanation of how the key elements of the methodology laid down in point (a) reflect ESG factors for each benchmark or family of benchmarks, with the exception of interest rate and foreign exchange benchmarks. Benchmark administrators shall comply with the requirement laid down in point (d) of the first subparagraph by 30 April 2020. 2. The procedures required under point (c) of paragraph 1 shall provide for: (a) advance notice, with a clear time frame, that gives the opportunity to analyse and comment upon the impact of such proposed material changes; and (b) the comments referred to in point (a) of this paragraph, and the administrator's response to those comments, to be made accessible after any consultation, except where confidentiality has been requested by the originator of the comments. 2a. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 to supplement this Regulation by laying down the minimum content of the explanation referred to in point (d) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of this Article, as well as the standard format to be used. 3. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify further the information to be provided by an administrator in compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2, distinguishing for different types of benchmarks and sectors as set out in this Regulation. ESMA shall take into account the need to disclose those elements of the methodology that provide for sufficient detail to allow users to understand how a benchmark is provided and to assess its representativeness, its relevance to particular users and its appropriateness as a reference for financial instruments and contracts and the principle of proportionality. However, the ESMA draft regulatory technical standards shall not cover or apply to administrators of non-significant benchmarks. ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 April 2017. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. 4. ESMA may issue guidelines in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, addressed to administrators of non-significant benchmarks to specify further the elements referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article.

INSERTED +997 −0 Art. 19a EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

A new Article 19a is added establishing requirements for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks, applying the standards set out in Annex III on top of the existing Titles II, III and IV requirements.

It also empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts specifying minimum standards covering underlying asset selection and exclusion criteria, weighting methodology, and the decarbonisation trajectory for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks, and states that administrators providing these benchmarks are to comply with the Regulation by 30 April 2020.

Cited: Art. 19a, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20191210)

Article 19a
EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks
1. The requirements laid down in Annex III shall apply to the provision of, and contribution to, EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks, in addition to the requirements of Titles II, III and IV.
2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 to supplement this Regulation by laying down the minimum standards for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks to specify:
(a) the criteria for the choice of the underlying assets, including, where applicable, any criteria for excluding assets;
(b) the criteria and method for the weighting of the underlying assets in the benchmark;
(c) the determination of the decarbonisation trajectory for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks.
3. Benchmark administrators which provide an EU Climate Transition Benchmark or an EU Paris-aligned Benchmark shall comply with this Regulation by 30 April 2020.

INSERTED +734 −0 Art. 19b Requirements for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

Article 19b is a new provision setting out requirements for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks, directing administrators to select, weight, or exclude underlying assets from companies following a decarbonisation trajectory by 31 December 2022, subject to disclosure of measurable carbon emission reduction targets, disaggregated emission reductions at subsidiary level, annual progress reporting, and a condition that related activities do not significantly harm other ESG objectives.

Cited: Art. 19b, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20191210)

Article 19b
Requirements for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks
Administrators of EU Climate Transition Benchmarks shall select, weight, or exclude underlying assets issued by companies that follow a decarbonisation trajectory by 31 December 2022, in accordance with the following requirements:
(i) the companies disclose measurable carbon emission reduction targets to be achieved within specific timeframes;
(ii) the companies disclose a reduction in carbon emissions which is disaggregated down to the level of relevant operating subsidiaries;
(iii) the companies disclose annual information on progress made towards those targets;
(iv) the activities relating to the underlying assets do not significantly harm other ESG objectives.

INSERTED +642 −0 Art. 19c Exclusions for EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

A new Article 19c is added, giving the Commission power to adopt a delegated act supplementing the Regulation by identifying sectors to be excluded from EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks because they lack measurable carbon emission reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement's objectives, with that act to be adopted and updated periodically.

It also states that the Commission is to take into account the work of the TEG when drawing up that delegated act.

The Commission shall adopt that delegated act by 1 January 2021 and update it every three years.

Cited: Art. 19c, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20191210)

Article 19c
Exclusions for EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks
1. The Commission is empowered to adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 49 in order to supplement this Regulation by identifying, in respect of EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks, the sectors to be excluded because they do not have measurable carbon emission reduction targets with specific deadlines that are aligned with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. The Commission shall adopt that delegated act by 1 January 2021 and update it every three years.
2. When drawing up the delegated act referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall take into account the work of the TEG.

INSERTED +324 −0 Art. 19d Endeavour to provide EU Climate Transition Benchmarks

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

A new Article 19d has been added, setting out that administrators located in the Union which provide significant benchmarks determined on the basis of the value of one or more underlying assets or prices shall endeavour to provide one or more EU Climate Transition Benchmarks by 1 January 2022.

Cited: Art. 19d, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20191210)

Article 19d
Endeavour to provide EU Climate Transition Benchmarks
By 1 January 2022, administrators which are located in the Union and which provide significant benchmarks determined on the basis of the value of one or more underlying assets or prices shall endeavour to provide one or more EU Climate Transition Benchmarks.

MODIFIED +49 −49 Art. 21 Mandatory administration of a critical benchmark

applies from: unchanged

The sentence describing the competent authority's end-of-period review and possible extension has been split into two separate sentences, and the maximum total period of mandatory administration has been changed from 24 months to five years.

Cited: Art. 21, v1 · Art. 21, v2

text before / after

32016R101102016R1011-20191210

Article 21 Mandatory administration of a critical benchmark 1. If an administrator of a critical benchmark intends to cease providing such benchmark, the administrator shall: (a) immediately notify its competent authority; and (b) within four weeks of such notification submit an assessment of how the benchmark: (i) is to be transitioned to a new administrator; or (ii) is to be ceased to be provided, taking into account the procedure established in Article 28(1). During the period referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph, the administrator shall not cease provision of the benchmark. 2. Upon receipt of the assessment of the administrator referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority shall: (a) inform ESMA and, where applicable, the college established under Article 46; and (b) within four weeks, make its own assessment of how the benchmark is to be transitioned to a new administrator or be ceased to be provided, taking into account the procedure established in accordance with Article 28(1). During the period of time referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the administrator shall not cease the provision of the benchmark without the written consent of the competent authority. 3. Following completion of the assessment referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2, the competent authority shall have the power to compel the administrator to continue publishing the benchmark until such time as: (a) the provision of the benchmark has been transitioned to a new administrator; (b) the benchmark can be ceased to be provided in an orderly fashion; or (c) the benchmark is no longer critical. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, the period for which the competent authority may compel the administrator to continue to publish the benchmark shall not exceed 12 months. By the end of that period, the competent authority shall review its decision to compel the administrator to continue to publish the benchmark and benchmark. The competent authority may, where necessary, extend the time that period by an appropriate period not exceeding a further 12 months. The maximum period of mandatory administration shall not exceed 24 months in total. five years. 4. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, in the event that the administrator of a critical benchmark is to be wound down due to insolvency proceedings, the competent authority shall make an assessment of whether and how the critical benchmark can be transitioned to a new administrator or can cease to be provided in an orderly fashion, taking into account the procedure established in accordance with Article 28(1).

MODIFIED +20 −38 Art. 23 Mandatory contribution to a critical benchmark

applies from: unchanged

The maximum period of mandatory contribution under points (a) and (b) of paragraph 6's first subparagraph is changed from a total not exceeding 24 months to a period not exceeding five years.

Correspondingly, paragraph 10's reference to the maximum period is changed from the 24-month period to the five-year period, and the word describing continued contribution is changed from 'continue to contribute' to 'contribute'.

Cited: Art. 23, v1 · Art. 23, v2

text before / after

32016R101102016R1011-20191210

Article 23 Mandatory contribution to a critical benchmark 1. This Article shall apply to critical benchmarks based on submissions by contributors the majority of which are supervised entities. 2. Administrators of one or more critical benchmarks shall, every two years, submit to their … 507 unchanged words … require the administrator to change the methodology, the code of conduct referred to in Article 15 or other rules of the critical benchmark. The maximum period of mandatory contribution under points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph shall not exceed 24 months in total. five years. 7. For the purposes of paragraph 6, supervised entities that are to be required to contribute input data shall be selected by the competent authority of the administrator, with the close cooperation of the competent authorities of the supervised entities, on the basis of the size of the supervised entity's actual and potential participation in the market that the benchmark intends to measure. 8. The competent authority of a supervised contributor that has been required to contribute to a benchmark through measures taken in accordance with point (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 6 shall cooperate with the competent authority of the administrator in the enforcement of such measures. 9. By the end of the period referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 6, the competent authority of the administrator shall review the measures adopted under paragraph 6. It shall revoke any of them if it considers that: (a) the contributors are likely to continue contributing input data for at least one year if the measure were revoked, which shall be evidenced by at least: (i) a written commitment by the contributors to the administrator and the competent authority to continue contributing input data to the critical benchmark for at least one year if the measure were revoked; (ii) a written report by the administrator to the competent authority providing evidence for its assessment that the critical benchmark's continued viability can be assured once mandatory contribution has been revoked; (b) the provision of the benchmark is able to continue once the contributors mandated to contribute input data have ceased contributing; (c) an acceptable substitute benchmark is available and users of the critical benchmark can switch to this substitute at minimal costs which shall be evidenced by at least a written report by the administrator detailing the means of transition to a substitute benchmark and the ability and costs to users of transitioning to this benchmark; or (d) no appropriate alternative contributors can be identified and the cessation of contributions from the relevant supervised entities would weaken the benchmark to such an extent to require the cessation of the benchmark. 10. In the event that a critical benchmark is to be ceased to be provided, each supervised contributor to that benchmark shall continue to contribute input data for a period of time determined by the competent authority, but not exceeding the maximum 24-month five year period laid down in the second subparagraph of paragraph 6. 11. The administrator shall notify the relevant competent authority in the event that any contributors breach the requirements set out in paragraph 6 as soon as reasonably possible. 12. In the event that a benchmark is recognised as critical in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 20(2), (3), (4) and (5), the competent authority of the administrator shall have the power to require input data in accordance with paragraph 5, and points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 6, of this Article only from supervised contributors located in its Member State.

MODIFIED +2,360 −0 Art. 27 Benchmark statement

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2019-11-27, 2019-12-09, 2020-04-30, 2021-12-31

The revised text adds a new paragraph 2a requiring that, from 30 April 2020, the benchmark statement explain how ESG factors are reflected in each benchmark or family of benchmarks, or state that no such objectives are pursued, and adds further disclosure requirements for significant equity and bond benchmarks and for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks tied to Article 9(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088, plus a further requirement from 31 December 2021 on explaining alignment of methodology with carbon emission reduction targets or the Paris Agreement objectives for benchmarks other than interest rate and foreign exchange benchmarks.

A new paragraph 2b is also added, empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts under Article 49 to supplement the Regulation by further specifying the information required under paragraph 2a and the standard format for references to ESG factors.

The remainder of Article 27, including paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, is unchanged between the two versions.

Cited: Art. 27, v2 · Art. 27, v1

text before / after

32016R101102016R1011-20191210

Article 27 Benchmark statement 1. Within two weeks of the inclusion of an administrator in the register referred to in Article 36, the administrator shall publish, by means that ensure fair and easy access, a benchmark statement for each benchmark or, where … 408 unchanged words … data or in the determination of the benchmark, including when a re-determination of the benchmark is required; and (g) the identification of potential limitations of the benchmark, including its operation in illiquid or fragmented markets and the possible concentration of inputs. 2a. By 30 April 2020, for each of the requirements referred to in paragraph 2, the benchmark statement shall contain an explanation of how ESG factors are reflected in each benchmark or family of benchmarks provided and published. For those benchmarks or families of benchmarks that do not pursue ESG objectives, it shall be sufficient for benchmark administrators to clearly state in the benchmark statement that they do not pursue such objectives. Where no EU Climate Transition Benchmark or EU Paris-aligned Benchmark is available in the portfolio of that individual benchmark administrator, or the individual benchmark administrator has no benchmarks that pursue ESG objectives or take into account ESG factors, this shall be stated in the benchmark statements of all benchmarks provided by that administrator. For significant equity and bond benchmarks, as well as for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks, benchmark administrators shall disclose in their benchmark statements details on whether or not and to what extent a degree of overall alignment with the target of reducing carbon emissions or the attainment of the objectives of the Paris Agreement is ensured in accordance with the disclosure rules for financial products in Article 9(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilRegulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (OJ L 317, 9.12.2019, p. 1).. By 31 December 2021, benchmark administrators shall, for each benchmark or, where applicable, each family of benchmarks, with the exception of interest rate and foreign exchange benchmarks, include in their benchmark statement an explanation of how their methodology aligns with the target of carbon emission reductions or attains the objectives of the Paris Agreement. 2b. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 to supplement this Regulation by further specifying the information to be provided in the benchmark statement pursuant to paragraph 2a of this Article, as well as the standard format to be used for references to ESG factors to enable market participants to make well-informed choices and to ensure the technical feasibility of compliance with that paragraph. 3. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify further the contents of a benchmark statement and the cases in which an update of such statement is required. ESMA shall distinguish between the different types of benchmarks and sectors as set out in this Regulation and shall take into account the principle of proportionality. ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 April 2017. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

MODIFIED +23 −11 Art. 42 Administrative sanctions and other administrative measures

applies from: unchanged

In point (a) of Article 42(1), the list of articles whose infringement can trigger administrative sanctions is expanded to add references to Articles 19a, 19b and 19c, alongside the previously listed articles.

The wording also changes from listing the articles with 'and' before the final entry to using 'or' before the final entry.

Cited: Art. 42, v2 · Art. 42, v1

text before / after

32016R101102016R1011-20191210

Article 42 Administrative sanctions and other administrative measures 1. Without prejudice to the supervisory powers of competent authorities in accordance with Article 41, and the right of Member States to provide for and impose criminal sanctions, Member States shall, in conformity with national law, provide for competent authorities to have the power to impose appropriate administrative sanctions and other administrative measures in relation to at least the following infringements: (a) any infringement of Articles Article 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19a, 19b, 19c, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and or 34 where they apply; and (b) any failure to cooperate or comply in an investigation or with an inspection or request covered by Article 41. Those administrative sanctions and other administrative measures shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 2. In the event of … 739 unchanged words … thereto. 4. Member States may provide competent authorities under national law to have other powers to impose sanctions in addition to those referred to in paragraph 1 and may provide for higher levels of sanctions than those established in paragraph 2.

MODIFIED +492 −79 Art. 49 Exercise of the delegation

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2019-12-10, 2024-03-11 · dates removed: 2016-06-30

The list of articles for which delegated-act power is conferred, may be revoked, and to which the objection procedure applies now also includes Articles 13(2a), 19a(2), 19c(1) and 27(2b), alongside the previously listed provisions.

The delegation period changed from an indeterminate period starting 30 June 2016 to a five-year period starting 10 December 2019, with a requirement that the Commission draw up a report no later than 11 March 2024 and with tacit extension for further equal periods unless the European Parliament or the Council objects at least three months before a period ends.

The reference to the Interinstitutional Agreement was reworded to describe it as the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making rather than the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016.

Cited: Art. 49, v1 · Art. 49, v2

text before / after

32016R101102016R1011-20191210

Article 49 Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 3(2), 13(2a), 19a(2), 19c(1), 20(6), 24(2), 27(2b), 33(7), 51(6) and 54(3) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate a period of time five years from 30 June 2016. 10 December 2019. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power no later than 11 March 2024. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for further periods of identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. 3. The delegation delegations of power referred to in Articles 3(2), 13(2a), 19a(2), 19c(1), 20(6), 24(2), 27(2b), 33(7), 51(6) and 54(3) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of power specified in that decision. It shall take effect on the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or on a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles Article 3(2), 13(2a), 19a(2), 19c(1), 20(6), 24(2), 27(2b), 33(7), 51(6) and or 54(3) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of three months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and to the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by three months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.

MODIFIED +844 −15 Art. 51 Transitional provisions

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2021-12-31

Two new paragraphs, 4a and 4b, were added addressing existing benchmarks recognised as critical benchmarks by a Commission implementing act under Article 20, allowing their continued provision and use for existing and new financial instruments, financial contracts, or performance measurement of investment funds until 31 December 2021, or until an authorisation application under paragraph 1 is refused.

In paragraph 5, the date by which financial instruments, financial contracts, or performance measurements of an investment fund must already reference, or add a reference to, a third-country benchmark was changed from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021.

Cited: Art. 51, v2 · Art. 51, v1

text before / after

32016R101102016R1011-20191210

Article 51 Transitional provisions 1. An index provider providing a benchmark on 30 June 2016 shall apply for authorisation or registration in accordance with Article 34 by 1 January 2020. 2. By 1 January 2020, the competent authority of the Member State where an index provider applying for authorisation in accordance with Article 34 is located shall have the power to decide to register that index provider as an administrator even if it is not a supervised entity, under the following conditions: (a) the index provider does not provide a critical benchmark; (b) the competent authority is aware, on a reasonable basis, that the index or indices provided by the index provider are not widely used, within the meaning of this Regulation, in the Member State where the index provider is located as well as in other Member States. The competent authority shall notify ESMA of its decision adopted in accordance with the first subparagraph. The competent authority shall keep evidence of the reasons for its decision adopted in accordance with the first subparagraph, in such a form that it is possible to fully understand the evaluations of the competent authority that the index or indices provided by the index provider are not widely used, including any market data, judgement or other information, as well as information received from the index provider. 3. An index provider may continue to provide an existing benchmark which may be used by supervised entities until 1 January 2020 or, where the index provider submits an application for authorisation or registration in accordance with paragraph 1, unless and until such authorisation or registration is refused. 4. Where an existing benchmark does not meet the requirements of this Regulation, but ceasing or changing that benchmark to fulfil the requirements of this Regulation would result in a force majeure event, frustrate or otherwise breach the terms of any financial contract or financial instrument or the rules of any investment fund, which references that benchmark, the use of the benchmark shall be permitted by the competent authority of the Member State where the index provider is located. No financial instruments, financial contracts, or measurements of the performance of an investment fund shall add a reference to such an existing benchmark after 1 January 2020. 4a. An index provider may continue to provide an existing benchmark that has been recognised as a critical benchmark by an implementing act adopted by the Commission in accordance with Article 20 until 31 December 2021 or, where the index provider submits an application for authorisation in accordance with paragraph 1, unless and until such authorisation is refused. 4b. An existing benchmark that has been recognised as a critical benchmark by an implementing act adopted by the Commission in accordance with Article 20 may be used for existing and new financial instruments, financial contracts, or for measuring the performance of an investment fund until 31 December 2021 or, where the index provider submits an application for authorisation in accordance with paragraph 1, unless and until such authorisation is refused. 5. Unless the Commission has adopted an equivalence decision as referred to in Article 30(2) or (3) or unless an administrator has been recognised pursuant to Article 32, or a benchmark has been endorsed pursuant to Article 33, the use in the Union by supervised entities of a benchmark provided by an administrator located in a third country where the benchmark is already used in the Union as a reference for financial instruments, financial contracts, or for measuring the performance of an investment fund, shall be permitted only for such financial instruments, financial contracts and measurements of the performance of an investment fund that already reference the benchmark in the Union on, or which add a reference to such benchmark prior to, 1 January 2020. 31 December 2021. 6. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 concerning measures to determine the conditions on which the relevant competent authority may assess whether the cessation or the changing of an existing benchmark to conform with the requirements of this Regulation could reasonably result in a force majeure event, frustrate or otherwise breach the terms of any financial contract or financial instrument or the rules of any investment fund which references such benchmark.

MODIFIED +1,398 −0 Art. 54 Review

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2020-04-01, 2022-12-31

Three new paragraphs were added at the end of Article 54, numbered 4, 5 and 6, none of which appeared in the earlier version.

Paragraph 4 sets a review by the Commission of minimum standards for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks concerning coherence of underlying assets with environmentally sustainable investments, and paragraph 5 sets a Commission report on the impact of the Regulation and the feasibility of an ESG benchmark, both tied to 31 December 2022, while paragraph 6 sets a Commission report by 1 April 2020 on the impact of the Regulation on third country benchmarks, including endorsement, recognition or equivalence recourse and the consequences of Article 51 paragraphs 4a, 4b and 4c.

Cited: Art. 54, v1 · Art. 54, v2

text before / after

32016R101102016R1011-20191210

Article 54 Review 1. By 1 January 2020, the Commission shall review and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on this Regulation and in particular on: (a) the functioning and effectiveness of the critical benchmark, mandatory administration and mandatory contribution regime under Articles 20, 21 and 23 and the definition of a critical benchmark in point (25) of Article 3(1); (b) the effectiveness of the authorisation, registration and supervision regime of administrators under Title VI and the colleges under Article 46 and the appropriateness of supervision of certain benchmarks by a Union body; (c) the functioning and effectiveness of Article 19(2), in particular the scope of its application. 2. The Commission shall review the evolution of international principles applicable to benchmarks and of legal frameworks and supervisory practices in third countries concerning the provision of benchmarks and report to the European Parliament and to the Council every five years after 1 January 2018. That report shall assess in particular whether there is a need to amend this Regulation and shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal, if appropriate. 3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 in order to extend the 42-month period referred to in Article 51(2) by 24 months, if the report referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 of this Article provides evidence that the transitional registration regime under Article 51(2) is not detrimental to a common European supervisory culture and consistent supervisory practices and approaches among competent authorities.4. By 31 December 2022, the Commission shall review the minimum standards for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and for EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks in order to ensure that the selection of the underlying assets is coherent with environmentally sustainable investments as defined in a Union-wide framework. 5. Before 31 December 2022, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the impact of this Regulation and the feasibility of an ESG benchmark, taking into account the evolving nature of sustainability indicators and the methods used to measure them. That report shall be accompanied, where appropriate by a legislative proposal. 6. By 1 April 2020, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the impact of this Regulation on the operation of third country benchmarks in the Union, including on the recourse by third country benchmark administrators to endorsement, recognition or equivalence, and on potential shortcomings of the current framework. That report shall analyse the consequences of the application of paragraphs 4a, 4b and 4c of Article 51 for Union and third-country benchmark administrators, including in terms of a level playing field. That report shall assess in particular whether there is a need to amend this Regulation and shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal, if appropriate.

INSERTED +4,537 −0 Annex III ANNEX III

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Sources disagree — the text comparison and the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.

Annex III is newly added text setting out methodology disclosure requirements for administrators of EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks, covering constituent lists, weighting criteria, exclusion criteria, decarbonisation trajectory data sources across Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, and total carbon emissions of the index portfolio.

It also adds provisions on disclosing tracking error and market-value ratios when a parent index is used, a Paris Agreement alignment formula requirement for Paris-aligned Benchmarks, and procedures for administrators to introduce, publicise and consult on methodology changes as well as to review methodologies at least annually.

Cited: Annex III, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02016R1011-20191210)

ANNEX III
EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks
Methodology for EU Climate Transition Benchmarks
(1) The administrator of an EU Climate Transition Benchmark shall formalise, document and make public any methodology used for the calculation of the benchmark, giving the following information, while ensuring confidentiality and the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) as defined in Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilDirective (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure (OJ L 157, 15.6.2016, p. 1).
(a) the list of the main constituents of the benchmark;
(b) all criteria and methods, including selection and weighting factors, metrics and proxies used in the benchmark methodology;
(c) the criteria applied to exclude assets or companies that are associated with a level of carbon footprint or a level of fossil fuel reserves that are incompatible with inclusion in the benchmark;
(d) the criteria for the determination of the decarbonisation trajectory;
(e) the type and source of data used to determine the decarbonisation trajectory for:
(i) Scope 1 carbon emissions, namely emissions generated from sources that are controlled by the company that issues the underlying assets;
(ii) Scope 2 carbon emissions, namely emissions from the consumption of purchased electricity, steam, or other sources of energy generated upstream from the company that issues the underlying assets;
(iii) Scope 3 carbon emissions, namely all indirect emissions that are not covered by points (i) and (ii) that occur in the value chain of the reporting company, including both upstream and downstream emissions, in particular for sectors with a high impact on climate change and its mitigation;
(iv) whether the data uses the Product and Organisation Environmental Footprint methods as defined in points (a) and (b) of point 2 of Commission Recommendation 2013/179/EU or global standards such as those of the Financial Stability Board’s Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures;
(f) the total carbon emissions of the index portfolio.
Where a parent index is used for the construction of an EU Climate Transition Benchmark, the tracking error between the EU Climate Transition Benchmark and the parent index shall be disclosed.
Where a parent index is used for the construction of an EU Climate Transition Benchmark, the ratio between the market value of the securities that are in the EU Climate Transition Benchmark and the market value of the securities in the parent index shall be disclosed.
Methodology for EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks
(2) In addition to points (1)(a), (1)(b), and (1)(c), the administrator of an EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks shall specify the formula or calculation that is used to determine whether the emissions are in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, while ensuring confidentiality and the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) as defined by Directive (EU) 2016/943.
Changes to the methodology
(3) Administrators of EU Climate Transition and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks shall adopt procedures for introducing changes to their methodology. They shall make those procedures public, and shall make public any proposed changes to their methodology and the rationale for those changes. Those procedures shall be consistent with the overriding objective that benchmark calculations be consistent with points (23a) and (23b) of Article 3(1). Those procedures shall provide:
(a) advance notice within a clear timeframe that gives users of benchmarks sufficient opportunity to analyse and comment on the impact of such proposed changes, having regard to the administrators’ calculation of the overall circumstances;
(b) for the possibility for users of benchmarks to comment on those changes and for the administrators to respond to those comments, and shall make those comments accessible after any given consultation period, except where the commenter has requested confidentiality.
(4) Administrators of EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks shall regularly examine their methodologies on at least an annual basis to ensure that their benchmarks reliably reflect the stated objectives, and shall have a process in place for taking the views of all relevant users into account.

MODIFIED ±0 TIS III

applies from: unknown

Sources disagree — the EU's own amendment metadata found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the amending act's instructions do not mention it. All are shown; none is overruled.

No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.

text before / after

No text on either side: this unit was named by a signal that carries no text, and only the structural diff carries any.

Back to top ↑

The full entry, with the citation mapping v1 = 32016R1011, v2 = 02016R1011-20191210, is committed at eu/32016R1011/CHANGELOG.md.