emendrix

Art. 383u

Capital Requirements Regulation · 32013R0575 · every event for this act · on EUR-Lex

Correlations across buckets for reference credit spread risk

2 changes recorded across 2 events, newest first.

in force 2025-01-01 INSERTED+960 −0

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 32024R1623 · Regulation (EU) 2024/2987 32024R2987 · Regulation (EU) 2024/2795 32024R2795

applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)

Article 383u is a newly inserted provision that sets out a table of cross-bucket correlation percentages to be used for reference credit spread delta risk and reference credit spread vega risk.

It also adds a rule stating that the correlation values from that table are to be divided by 2 when applied between a bucket from the group of buckets 1 to 10 and a bucket from the group of buckets 12 to 18.

Cited: Art. 383u, v2

text before / after

inserted text (02013R0575-20250101)

Article 383u
Correlations across buckets for reference credit spread risk
1. The cross-bucket correlations for reference credit spread delta risk and reference credit spread vega risk shall be the following:
Table 1
Bucket 1, 2 and 12 3 and 14 4 and 15 5 and 16 6 and 17 7 and 18 8 and 19 9 and 10 20 11 19
1, 2, and 12 100 % 75 % 10 % 20 % 25 % 20 % 15 % 10 % 0 % 45 % 45 %
3 and 14 100 % 5 % 15 % 20 % 15 % 10 % 10 % 0 % 45 % 45 %
4 and 15 100 % 5 % 15 % 20 % 5 % 20 % 0 % 45 % 45 %
5 and 16 100 % 20 % 25 % 5 % 5 % 0 % 45 % 45 %
6 and 17 100 % 25 % 5 % 15 % 0 % 45 % 45 %
7 and 18 100 % 5 % 20 % 0 % 45 % 45 %
8 and 19 100 % 5 % 0 % 45 % 45 %
9 and 10 100 % 0 % 45 % 45 %
20 100 % 0 % 0 %
11 100 % 75 %
19 100 %
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the cross-bucket correlation values calculated in that paragraph shall be divided by 2 for correlations between a bucket from the group of buckets 1 to 10 and a bucket from the group of buckets 12 to 18.

in force 2024-07-09 INSERTED

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 32024R1623

applies from: unknown

Sources disagree — the amending act's instructions found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.

text before / after, on the event page →