Art. 325j

02013R0575-20240709 → 02013R0575-20250101

Article 325j Treatment of collective investment undertakings 1. An institution shall calculate the own funds requirements for market risk of a position in a CIU using one of the following approaches: (a) where an institution is able to obtain sufficient information about that meets the individual underlying exposures of the CIU, the institution condition set out in Article 104(8), point (a), shall calculate the own funds requirements for market risk of that CIU position by looking through to the underlying positions of the CIU CIU, on a monthly basis, as if those positions were directly held by the institution; (b) where an institution that meets the institution is not able to obtain sufficient information about the individual underlying exposures of the CIU, but the institution has knowledge of the content the mandate of the CIU and daily price quotes for the CIU can be obtained, the institution condition set out in Article 104(8), point (b), shall calculate the own funds requirements for market risk of that CIU position by using one either of the following approaches: (i) the institution may it shall consider the position in the CIU as a single equity position allocated to the bucket other sector in Article 325ap(1), Table 8 of Article 325ap(1); 8; (ii) upon permission from its competent authority, an institution may calculate the own funds requirements for market risk of the CIU in accordance with it shall consider the limits set in the CIU’s mandate and in the relevant law; (c) where law. For the purposes of the calculation referred to in the first subparagraph, point (b)(ii), of this paragraph the institution meets neither the conditions in point (a) nor (b), the institution shall allocate the CIU to the non-trading book. An institution that uses one of the approaches set out in point (b) shall apply the own funds requirement for the default risk set out in Section 5 of this Chapter and the residual risk add-on set out in Section 4 of this Chapter where the mandate of the CIU implies that some exposures in the CIU shall be subject to those own funds requirements. An institution that uses the approach set out in point (ii) of point (b) may calculate the own funds requirements for counterparty credit risk and own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment risk of derivative positions of the CIU, CIU using the simplified approach set out in Article 132a(3). 1a. For the purposes of the approaches referred to in paragraph 3 1, point (b), of this Article 132a. the institution shall: (a) apply the own funds requirements for default risk set out in Section 5 and the residual risk add-on set out in Section 4 to a position in a CIU, where the mandate of that CIU allows it to invest in exposures that shall be subject to those own funds requirements; when using the approach referred to in paragraph 1, point (b)(i), of this Article the institution shall consider the position in the CIU as a single unrated equity position allocated to the bucket unrated in Article 325y(1), Table 2; and (b) for all positions in the same CIU, use the same approach among the approaches set out in paragraph 1, point (b), of this Article to calculate the own funds requirements on a stand-alone basis as a separate portfolio. 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, where an institution has a position in a CIU that tracks an index benchmark so that the annualised return difference between the CIU and the tracked index benchmark over the last 12 months is below 1 % in absolute terms, ignoring fees and commissions, the institution may treat that position as a position in the tracked index benchmark. An institution shall verify compliance with that condition when the institution enters into the position and, after that, at least annually. However, where data for the last 12 months are not fully available, an institution may, subject to permission from the institution’s competent authority, use an annualised return difference from a period shorter than 12 months. 3. An institution may use a combination of the approaches referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (b) (a) and (c) of paragraph 1 (b), for its positions in CIUs. However, an institution shall use only one of those approaches for all the positions in the same CIU. 4. For the purposes of point (b) of paragraph 1, point (b)(ii), of this Article an institution shall carry out the calculations under the following provisions: (a) for the purposes of calculating calculate the own funds requirement under requirements for market risk by determining the sensitivities-based method set out in Section 2 hypothetical portfolio of this Chapter, the CIU shall first take position to the maximum extent allowed under its mandate or relevant law in the exposures attracting that would attract the highest own funds requirements set out under that Section and shall then continue in accordance with Article 325c(2), point (a), based on the CIU’s mandate or relevant law, taking positions in descending order until into account the leverage to the maximum total loss limit is reached; (b) for extent, where applicable. The institution shall use the purposes of same hypothetical portfolio as the one referred to in the first subparagraph to calculate, where applicable, the own fund funds requirements for the default risk set out in Section 5 of this Chapter, and the CIU shall first take position to the maximum extent allowed under its mandate or relevant law in the exposures attracting the highest own funds requirements residual risk add-on set out under that in Section and shall then continue taking positions 4 to a position in descending order until a CIU. The methodology developed by the maximum total loss limit is reached; (c) institution to determine the CIU shall apply leverage to the maximum extent allowed under its mandate or relevant law, where applicable. The own funds requirements for hypothetical portfolios of all positions in the same CIU CIUs for which the calculations referred to in the first subparagraph are used shall be calculated on a stand-alone basis as a separate portfolio using the approach set out in this Chapter. approved by its competent authority. 5. An institution may use the approaches referred to in point (a) or (b) of paragraph 1 only where the CIU meets all of the conditions set out in Article 132(3) 132(3). Where the CIU does not meet all of the conditions set out in Article 132(3), the institution shall assign its positions in that CIU to the non-trading book. 6. To calculate the own funds requirements for market risk of a CIU position in accordance with the approach set out in paragraph 1, point (a), institutions may rely on a third party to perform such calculation, provided that all of the following conditions are met: (a) the third party is one of the following: (i) the depository institution or the depository financial institution of the CIU, provided that the CIU exclusively invests in securities and deposits all securities at that depository institution or depository financial institution; (ii) for CIUs not covered by point (a) (i) of this point, the CIU management company, provided that the CIU management company meets the criteria set out in Article 132(4). 132(3), point (a); (iii) a third-party vendor on condition that the data, information or risk metrics are provided or calculated by the third parties referred to in point (i) or (ii) of this point or by another such third-party vendor; (b) the third party provides the institution with the data, information or risk metrics to calculate the own funds requirement for market risk of the CIU position in accordance with the approach referred to in paragraph 1, point (a), of this Article; (c) an external auditor of the institution has confirmed the adequacy of the third-party’s data, information or risk metrics referred to in point (b) of this paragraph and the institution’s competent authority has unrestricted access to those data, information or risk metrics upon request. 7. EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to further specify the technical elements of the methodology to determine hypothetical portfolios for the purposes of the approach set out in paragraph 4, including the manner in which institutions are to take into account in the methodology, where applicable, leverage to the maximum extent. EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 10 January 2027. Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.