in force 2019-01-01 MODIFIED+3,558 −2,822§
Amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2401 32017R2401 · Regulation (EU) 2019/876 32019R0876
applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)
dates added to the text: 2021-01-02 · dates removed: 2017-12-31
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. Both are shown; neither is overruled.
The article's heading and subject matter change from synthetic securitisation to traditional securitisation, with the operative rule now expressed as excluding underlying exposures from risk-weighted exposure calculations rather than calculating them under Article 249.
The conditions for significant credit risk transfer are restructured, replacing the prior deduction-based test in paragraph 2(b) with a first-loss-tranche test split into two sub-conditions, and paragraph 4's list of transfer conditions is expanded and reworded to address control retention, payment obligations, and a legal opinion tied to Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402.
The closing paragraphs replace the EBA guideline-issuance and Member State review process with an EBA reporting obligation covering specified review items, and the date by which the EBA must report to the Commission changes from 31 December 2017 to 2 January 2021.
Cited: Art. 244, v1 · Art. 244, v2
text before / after
texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately
before (02013R0575-20180101)
Article 244 Synthetic securitisation 1. An originator institution of a synthetic securitisation may calculate risk-weighted exposure amounts, and, as relevant, expected loss amounts, for the securitised exposures in accordance with Article 249, if either of the following is met: (a) significant credit risk is considered to have been transferred to third parties either through funded or unfunded credit protection; (b) the originator institution applies a 1250 % risk weight to all securitisation positions it holds in this securitisation or deducts these securitisation positions from Common Equity Tier 1 items in accordance with Article 36(1)(k). 2. Significant credit risk shall be considered to have been transferred if either of the following conditions is met: (a) the risk-weighted exposure amounts of the mezzanine securitisation positions which are held by the originator institution in this securitisation do not exceed 50 % of the risk-weighted exposure amounts of all mezzanine securitisation positions existing in this securitisation; (b) where there are no mezzanine securitisation positions in a given securitisation and the originator can demonstrate that the exposure value of the securitisation positions that would be subject to deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 or a 1250 % risk weight exceeds a reasoned estimate of the expected loss on the securitised exposures by a substantial margin, the originator institution does not hold more than 20 % of the exposure values of the securitisation positions that would be subject to deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 or a 1250 % risk weight. Where the possible reduction in risk-weighted exposure amounts, which the originator institution would achieve by this securitisation, is not justified by a commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties, competent authority may decide on a case- by-case basis that significant credit risk shall not be considered to have been transferred to third parties. 3. For the purposes of paragraph 2, mezzanine securitisation positions means securitisation positions to which a risk weight lower than 1250 % applies and that are more junior than the most senior position in this securitisation and more junior than any securitisation positions in this securitisation to which either of the following is assigned in accordance with Section 4: (a) in the case of a securitisation position subject to Section 3, Sub-section 3 a credit quality step 1; (b) in the case of a securitisation position subject to Section 3, Sub-section 4 a credit quality step 1 or 2. 4. As an alternative to paragraphs 2 and 3, competent authorities shall grant permission to originator institutions to consider significant credit risk as having been transferred where the originator institution is able to demonstrate, in every case of a securitisation, that the reduction of own funds requirements which the originator achieves by the securitisation is justified by a commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties. Permission shall be granted only where the institution meets all of the following conditions: (a) the institution has appropriately risk-sensitive policies and methodologies in place to assess the transfer of risk; (b) the institution has also recognised the transfer of credit risk to third parties in each case for the purposes of the institution's internal risk management and its internal capital allocation. 5. In addition to the requirements set out in paragraphs 1 to 4, as applicable, the transfer shall comply with the following conditions: (a) the securitisation documentation reflects the economic substance of the transaction; (b) the credit protection by which the credit risk is transferred complies with Article 247(2); (c) the instruments used to transfer credit risk do not contain terms or conditions that: (i) impose significant materiality thresholds below which credit protection is deemed not to be triggered if a credit event occurs; (ii) allow for the termination of the protection due to deterioration of the credit quality of the underlying exposures; (iii) other than in the case of early amortisation provisions, require positions in the securitisation to be improved by the originator institution; (iv) increase the institution's cost of credit protection or the yield payable to holders of positions in the securitisation in response to a deterioration in the credit quality of the underlying pool; (d) an opinion is obtained from qualified legal counsel confirming the enforceability of the credit protection in all relevant jurisdictions; (e) the securitisation documentation shall make clear, where applicable, that any purchase or repurchase of securitisation positions by the originator or sponsor beyond its contractual obligations may only be made at arm's length; (f) where there is a clean-up call option, that option meets all the following conditions: (i) it is exercisable at the discretion of the originator institution; (ii) it may only be exercised when 10 % or less of the original value of the exposures securitised remains unamortised; (iii) it is not structured to avoid allocating losses to credit enhancement positions or other positions held by investors and is not otherwise structured to provide credit enhancement. 6. The competent authorities shall keep EBA informed about the specific cases, referred to in paragraph 2, where the possible reduction in risk-weighted exposure amounts is not justified by a commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties, and the use institutions make of paragraph 4. EBA shall monitor the range of practices in this area and shall, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, issue guidelines. EBA shall review Member States' implementation of those guidelines and provide advice to the Commission by 31 December 2017 on whether a binding technical standard is required.
after (02013R0575-20190101)
Article 244 Traditional securitisation 1. The originator institution of a traditional securitisation may exclude underlying exposures from its calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts and, where relevant, expected loss amounts if either of the following conditions is fulfilled: (a) significant credit risk associated with the underlying exposures has been transferred to third parties; (b) the originator institution applies a 1250 % risk weight to all securitisation positions it holds in the securitisation or deducts these securitisation positions from Common Equity Tier 1 items in accordance with point (k) of Article 36(1). 2. Significant credit risk shall be considered as transferred in either of the following cases: (a) the risk-weighted exposure amounts of the mezzanine securitisation positions held by the originator institution in the securitisation do not exceed 50 % of the risk-weighted exposure amounts of all mezzanine securitisation positions existing in this securitisation; (b) the originator institution does not hold more than 20 % of the exposure value of the first loss tranche in the securitisation, provided that both of the following conditions are met: (i) the originator can demonstrate that the exposure value of the first loss tranche exceeds a reasoned estimate of the expected loss on the underlying exposures by a substantial margin; (ii) there are no mezzanine securitisation positions. Where the possible reduction in risk-weighted exposure amounts, which the originator institution would achieve by the securitisation under points (a) or (b), is not justified by a commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties, competent authorities may decide on a case-by-case basis that significant credit risk shall not be considered as transferred to third parties. 3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, competent authorities may allow originator institutions to recognise significant credit risk transfer in relation to a securitisation where the originator institution demonstrates in each case that the reduction in own funds requirements which the originator achieves by the securitisation is justified by a commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties. Permission may only be granted where the institution meets both of the following conditions: (a) the institution has adequate internal risk management policies and methodologies to assess the transfer of credit risk; (b) the institution has also recognised the transfer of credit risk to third parties in each case for the purposes of the institution’s internal risk management and its internal capital allocation. 4. In addition to the requirements set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, all of the following conditions shall be met: (a) the transaction documentation reflects the economic substance of the securitisation; (b) the securitisation positions do not constitute payment obligations of the originator institution; (c) the underlying exposures are placed beyond the reach of the originator institution and its creditors in a manner that meets the requirement set out in Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402; (d) the originator institution does not retain control over the underlying exposures. It shall be considered that control is retained over the underlying exposures where the originator has the right to repurchase from the transferee the previously transferred exposures in order to realise their benefits or if it is otherwise required to re-assume transferred risk. The originator institution’s retention of servicing rights or obligations in respect of the underlying exposures shall not of itself constitute control of the exposures; (e) the securitisation documentation does not contain terms or conditions that: (i) require the originator institution to alter the underlying exposures to improve the average quality of the pool; or (ii) increase the yield payable to holders of positions or otherwise enhance the positions in the securitisation in response to a deterioration in the credit quality of the underlying exposures; (f) where applicable, the transaction documentation makes it clear that the originator or the sponsor may only purchase or repurchase securitisation positions or repurchase, restructure or substitute the underlying exposures beyond their contractual obligations where such arrangements are executed in accordance with prevailing market conditions and the parties to them act in their own interest as free and independent parties (arm’s length); (g) where there is a clean-up call option, that option shall also meet all of the following conditions: (i) it can be exercised at the discretion of the originator institution; (ii) it may only be exercised when 10 % or less of the original value of the underlying exposures remains unamortised; (iii) it is not structured to avoid allocating losses to credit enhancement positions or other positions held by investors in the securitisation and is not otherwise structured to provide credit enhancement; (h) the originator institution has received an opinion from a qualified legal counsel confirming that the securitisation complies with the conditions set out in point (c) of this paragraph. 5. The competent authorities shall inform the EBA of those cases where they have decided that the possible reduction in risk-weighted exposure amounts was not justified by a commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties in accordance with paragraph 2, and the cases where institutions have chosen to apply paragraph 3. 6. The EBA shall monitor the range of supervisory practices in relation to the recognition of significant risk transfer in traditional securitisations in accordance with this Article. In particular, the EBA shall review: (a) the conditions for the transfer of significant credit risk to third parties in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3 and 4; (b) the interpretation of commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties for the purposes of the competent authorities’ assessment provided for in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 and in paragraph 3; (c) the requirements for the competent authorities’ assessment of securitisation transactions in relation to which the originator seeks recognition of significant credit risk transfer to third parties in accordance with paragraph 2 or 3. The EBA shall report its findings to the Commission by 2 January 2021. The Commission may, having taken into account the report from the EBA, adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 462, to supplement this Regulation by further specifying the items listed in points (a), (b) and (c) of this paragraph.