in force 2025-01-01 MODIFIED+631 −26§
Amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 32024R1623 · Regulation (EU) 2024/2987 32024R2987 · Regulation (EU) 2024/2795 32024R2795
applies from: unchanged
The wording of point (b) changes from requiring the extent of credit protection to be "clearly defined" to requiring it to be "clearly set out", and point (c) now refers to clauses outside the control of the "lending institution" rather than the "lender".
Point (c)(i) now covers clauses allowing the protection provider to cancel or change the credit protection unilaterally, whereas before it only covered cancellation, and point (c)(ii) refers to the "credit protection" cost rather than the "protection" cost.
Two new subparagraphs are added after point (d) in paragraph 1, stating that a clause allowing flawed due diligence or fraud by the lending institution to cancel or diminish the protection does not disqualify it, and clarifying that the protection provider may pay a lump sum or assume the obligor's future payment obligations, with no changes shown to paragraphs 2 or 3.
Cited: Art. 213, v2 · Art. 213, v1
text before / after
02013R0575-20240709 → 02013R0575-20250101
Article 213
Requirements common to guarantees and credit derivatives
1. Subject to Article 214(1), credit protection deriving from a guarantee or credit derivative shall qualify as eligible unfunded credit protection where all of the following conditions are met:
(a) the credit protection is direct;
(b) the extent of the credit protection is clearly defined set out and incontrovertible;
(c) the credit protection contract does not contain any clause, the fulfilment of which is outside the direct control of the lender, lending institution, that:
(i) would allow the protection provider to cancel or change the credit protection unilaterally;
(ii) would increase the effective cost of the credit protection as a result of a deterioration in the credit quality of the protected exposure;
(iii) could prevent the protection provider from being obliged to pay out in a timely manner in the event that the original obligor fails to make any payments due, or when where the leasing contract has expired for the purposes purpose of recognising guaranteed residual value under Articles 134(7) and 166(4);
(iv) could allow the maturity of the credit protection to be reduced by the protection provider;
(d) the credit protection contract is legally effective and enforceable in all jurisdictions which are relevant at the time of the conclusion of the credit agreement.
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (c), a clause in the credit protection contract providing that flawed due diligence or fraud by the lending institution cancels or diminishes the extent of the credit protection offered by the guarantor, shall not disqualify that credit protection from being eligible.
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (c), the protection provider may make one lump sum payment of all monies due under the claim, or may assume the future payment obligations of the obligor covered by the credit protection contract.
2. An institution shall demonstrate to competent authorities that it has in place systems to manage potential concentration of risk arising from its use of guarantees and credit derivatives. An institution shall be able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authorities how its strategy in respect of its use of credit derivatives and guarantees interacts with its management of its overall risk profile.
3. An institution shall fulfil any contractual and statutory requirements in respect of, and take all steps necessary to ensure, the enforceability of its unfunded credit protection under the law applicable to its interest in the credit protection.
An institution shall have conducted sufficient legal review confirming the enforceability of the unfunded credit protection in all relevant jurisdictions. It shall repeat such review as necessary to ensure continuing enforceability.