emendrix

Art. 181

Capital Requirements Regulation · 32013R0575 · every event for this act · on EUR-Lex

Requirements specific to own-LGD estimates

3 changes recorded across 3 events, newest first.

in force 2025-01-01 MODIFIED+1,362 −598

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 32024R1623 · Regulation (EU) 2024/2987 32024R2987 · Regulation (EU) 2024/2795 32024R2795

applies from: unchanged

Points (c) through (g) now refer specifically to funded credit protection other than master netting agreements and on-balance-sheet netting of loans and deposits, rather than to collateral generally as in the earlier text, with corresponding wording adjustments in each of those points.

Point (i) now specifies that the late-payment fees added to the exposure and loss measure are those imposed on the obligor before the time of default, a qualification absent from the earlier wording.

Point (j) now adds regional governments, local authorities and public sector entities to the list of exposure types for which the five-to-seven-year LGD data requirement applies, and paragraph 2 adds new text on how future additional drawings are to be reflected in the LGD numerator and denominator, while also rephrasing the description of the period increase to a minimum of five years.

Cited: Art. 181, v1 · Art. 181, v2

text before / after

02013R0575-2024070902013R0575-20250101

Article 181 Requirements specific to own-LGD estimates 1. In quantifying the risk parameters to be associated with rating grades or pools, institutions shall apply the following requirements specific to own-LGD estimates: (a) institutions shall estimate LGDs by facility grade or pool on the basis of the average realised LGDs by facility grade or pool using all observed defaults within the data sources (default weighted average); (b) institutions shall use LGD estimates that are appropriate for an economic downturn if those are more conservative than the long-run average. To the extent a rating system is expected to deliver realised LGDs at a constant level by grade or pool over time, institutions shall make adjustments to their estimates of risk parameters by grade or pool to limit the capital impact of an economic downturn; (c) an institution shall consider the extent of any dependence between between, on the one hand, the risk of the obligor and and, on the other hand, that of the collateral funded credit protection, other than master netting agreements and on-balance-sheet netting of loans and deposits, or collateral provider. Cases where there is a significant degree of dependence shall be addressed in a conservative manner; its provider; (d) currency mismatches between the underlying obligation and the collateral funded credit protection other than master netting agreements and on-balance-sheet netting of loans and deposits shall be treated conservatively in the institution's institution’s assessment of LGD; (e) to the extent that LGD estimates take into account the existence of collateral, these funded credit protection other than master netting agreements and on-balance-sheet netting of loans and deposits, those estimates shall not solely be based on the collateral's estimated market value. LGD estimates shall take into account the effect value of the potential inability of institutions to expeditiously gain control of their collateral and liquidate it; funded credit protection; (f) to the extent that LGD estimates take into account the existence of collateral, funded credit protection other than master netting agreements and on-balance-sheet netting of loans and deposits, institutions shall establish internal requirements for collateral the management, legal certainty and risk management of that are funded credit protection, and those requirements shall be generally consistent with those set out in Chapter 4, Section 3; 3, Sub-section 1; (g) to the extent that an institution recognises collateral funded credit protection other than master netting agreements and on-balance-sheet netting of loans and deposits for determining the exposure value for counterparty credit risk in accordance with Chapter 6, Section 5 or 6, any amount expected to be recovered from the collateral that funded credit protection shall not be taken into account in the LGD estimates; (h) for the specific case of exposures already in default, the institution shall use the sum of its best estimate of expected loss for each exposure given current economic circumstances and exposure status and its estimate of the increase of loss rate caused by possible additional unexpected losses during the recovery period, i.e. between date of default and final liquidation of the exposure; (i) to the extent that unpaid fees for late fees payments, imposed on the obligor before the time of default, have been capitalised in the institution's institution’s income statement, they shall be added to the institution's measure of exposure and loss; (j) for exposures to corporates, institutions and institutions, central governments and central banks, and regional governments, local authorities and public sector entities, estimates of LGD shall be based on data over a minimum of five years, increasing by one year each year after implementation until a minimum of seven years is reached, for at least one data source. If source, if the available observation period spans a longer period for any source, and the data is are relevant, this that longer period shall be used. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (a), of this paragraph institutions shall adequately take into account recoveries realised in the course of the relevant recovery processes from any type of funded credit protection as well as from unfunded credit protection not falling under the definition in Article 142(1), point (10). For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (c), cases where there is a significant degree of dependence shall be addressed in a conservative manner. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (e), LGD estimates shall take into account the effect of the potential inability of institutions to expeditiously gain control of their collateral and liquidate it. 2. For retail exposures, institutions may do the following: (a) derive LGD estimates from realised losses and appropriate estimates of PDs; (b) reflect future drawings either in their conversion factors or in their LGD estimates; (c) For purchased retail receivables use external and internal reference data to estimate LGDs. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (b), where institutions include future additional drawings in their conversion factors, those should be taken into account in the LGD in both the numerator and the denominator. Where institutions do not include future additional drawings in their conversion factors, those should be taken into account in the LGD numerator only. For retail exposures, estimates of LGD shall be based on data over a minimum of five years. An institution need not give equal importance to historic data if more recent data is a better predictor of loss rates. Subject to the permission of the competent authorities, institutions may use, when they implement the IRB Approach, relevant data covering a period of two years. The period to be covered shall increase be increased by one year each year until relevant data cover a period of at least five years. 3. EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the following: (a) the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn referred to in paragraph 1; (b) the conditions according to which a competent authority may permit an institution pursuant to paragraph 2 to use relevant data covering a period of two years when the institution implements the IRB Approach. EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 31 December 2014. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010. 4. EBA shall issue guidelines, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, to clarify the treatment of any type of funded credit protection and unfunded credit protection for the purposes of paragraph 1, point (a), of this Article and for the purposes of the application of the LGD parameters. 5. For the purpose of calculating loss, EBA shall, by 31 December 2025, issue updated guidelines, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, on the following: (a) with regard to cases that return to non-defaulted status, specifying how artificial cash flow is to be treated and whether it is more appropriate for institutions to discount the artificial cash flow over the actual period of default; (b) assessing whether the calibration and application of the discount rate is appropriate for the calculation of economic loss across all exposures.

in force 2024-07-09 MODIFIED

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 32024R1623

applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)

dates added to the text: 2025-12-31

Paragraph 1, point (j), now has three additional subparagraphs clarifying that, for point (a), recoveries from funded and unfunded credit protection (excluding the type defined in Article 142(1), point (10)) are to be adequately taken into account, and restating the conservative treatment required under points (c) and (e).

Two new paragraphs, 4 and 5, have been added requiring EBA to issue guidelines clarifying the treatment of funded and unfunded credit protection for point (a) of paragraph 1 and for applying LGD parameters, and to issue, by 31 December 2025, updated guidelines on the treatment of artificial cash flow for exposures returning to non-defaulted status and on the appropriateness of the discount rate calibration and application for calculating economic loss.

The earlier version contained none of these additional subparagraphs or the two new guideline-issuing paragraphs.

Cited: Art. 181, v2 · Art. 181, v1

text before / after, on the event page →

detected 2026-08-13 MODIFIED

no amending act named

applies from: unchanged

In point (1)(c), the phrasing describing dependence between the risk of the obligor and that of the collateral or collateral provider was corrected from an inconsistent construction to a parallel one using "and" instead of "with".

In paragraph 2, the wording was changed from "An institution needs not give" to "An institution need not give" equal importance to historic data.

In paragraph 3(b), the cross-reference to institutions using relevant data covering a period of two years was changed from referring to paragraph 3 to referring to paragraph 2, and the wording was adjusted from "permit and institution" to "permit an institution".

Cited: Art. 181, v1 · Art. 181, v2

text before / after, on the event page →