emendrix

Art. 169

Capital Requirements Regulation · 32013R0575 · every event for this act · on EUR-Lex

General principles

2 changes recorded across 2 events, newest first.

in force 2025-01-01 MODIFIED+292 −0

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 32024R1623 · Regulation (EU) 2024/2987 32024R2987 · Regulation (EU) 2024/2795 32024R2795

applies from: unchanged

A new sentence has been added to point 3 stating that the EBA shall issue guidelines, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, on how to apply in practice the requirements on model design, risk quantification, validation and application of risk parameters using continuous or very granular rating scales for each risk parameter.

The rest of the article, covering points 1 and 2 and the first part of point 3, is unchanged between the two versions.

Cited: Art. 169, v2 · Art. 169, v1

text before / after

02013R0575-2024070902013R0575-20250101

Article 169 General principles 1. Where an institution uses multiple rating systems, the rationale for assigning an obligor or a transaction to a rating system shall be documented and applied in a manner that appropriately reflects the level of risk. 2. Assignment criteria and processes shall be periodically reviewed to determine whether they remain appropriate for the current portfolio and external conditions. 3. Where an institution uses direct estimates of risk parameters for individual obligors or exposures these may be seen as estimates assigned to grades on a continuous rating scale.EBA shall issue guidelines, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, on how to apply in practice the requirements on model design, risk quantification, validation and application of risk parameters using continuous or very granular rating scales for each risk parameter.

in force 2024-07-09 MODIFIED

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 32024R1623

applies from: unknown

Sources disagree — the amending act's instructions found this change; the text comparison finds no difference in the provision's text and the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. All are shown; none is overruled.

No explanation shipped — the structural diff did not see this change, so it carries no text; another signal named the unit and the disagreement ships as `disputed`.

text before / after, on the event page →