in force 2018-01-01
02013R0575-20160719 → 02013R0575-20180101
Amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2395 32017R2395 · Regulation (EU) 2017/2188 32017R2188
detected 2026-08-13
6 provisions touched — 6 substantive, 0 date-only, 3 disputed · every change carries an explanation that passed its citation check
Emendrix checks every change against three independent sources. Where they disagree it says so rather than picking a winner.
MODIFIED +29 −34 Art. 308 Own funds requirements for pre-funded contributions to the default fund of a QCCP§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. Both are shown; neither is overruled.
The formulas in paragraph 3, points (b) and (c), have minor spacing changes in how the term DF* is written, with no change to the symbols, variables, or structure of the calculation.
The definition of DFCM* in paragraph 3 drops a trailing double semicolon after the formula, leaving a single semicolon.
Cited: Art. 308, v1 · Art. 308, v2
text before / after
02013R0575-20160719 → 02013R0575-20180101
Article 308
Own funds requirements for pre-funded contributions to the default fund of a QCCP
1. The exposure value for an institution's pre-funded contribution to the default fund of a QCCP (DFi) shall be the amount paid in or the market value of the assets delivered by that institution reduced by any amount of that contribution that the QCCP has already used to absorb its losses following the default of one or more of its clearing members.
2. An institution shall calculate the own funds requirement (Ki) to cover the exposure arising from its pre-funded contribution (DFi) as follows:Ki1β NN 2 DFiDFCM KCM
where:
β
the concentration factor communicated to the institution by the CCP;
N
the number of clearing members communicated to the institution by the CCP;
DFCM
the sum of pre-funded contributions of all clearing members of the CCP iDFicommunicated to the institution by the CCP;
KCM
the sum of the own funds requirements of all clearing members of the CCP calculated in accordance with the applicable formula specified in paragraph 3 iKi.
3. An institution shall calculate KCM as follows:
(a) where KCCP ≤ DFCCP, the institution shall use the following formula:
KCMc1 DFCM*;
(b) where DFCCP < KCCP ≤DF*, the institution shall use the following formula:
KCMc2 KCCP DFCCPc1 DF * DF* KCCP;
(c) where DF* < KCCP, the institution shall use the following formula:
KCMc2 μ KCCP DF *c2 DF*c2 DFCM*
where:
DFCCP
the pre-funded financial resources of the CCP communicated to the institution by the CCP;
KCCP
the hypothetical capital of the CCP communicated to the institution by the CCP;
DF*
DFCCP DFCM*;
DFCM*
DFCM 2 DFi;; DFi;
DFi
the average pre-funded contribution, 1N DFCM, communicated to the institution by the CCP;
c1
a capital factor equal to max 1.6 %DF *KCCP0.3, 0.16% %DF*KCCP0.3,0.16%
c2
a capital factor equal to 100 %;
μ
1,2.
4. An institution shall calculate the risk-weighted exposure amounts for exposures arising from an institution's pre-funded contribution for the purposes of Article 92(3) as the own funds requirement (Ki) determined in accordance with paragraph 2 multiplied by 12,5.
5. Where KCCP is equal to zero, institutions shall use the value for c1 of 0,16 % for the purpose of the calculation in paragraph 3.
MODIFIED ±0 Art. 309 Own funds requirements for pre-funded contributions to the default fund of a non-qualifying CCP and for unfunded contributions to a non-qualifying CCP§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. Both are shown; neither is overruled.
The only visible difference between the two versions of Article 309(1) is a formatting change in the spacing of the formula notation, with no change to the words or figures used in the provision.
Cited: Art. 309, v1 · Art. 309, v2
text before / after
02013R0575-20160719 → 02013R0575-20180101
Article 309 Own funds requirements for pre-funded contributions to the default fund of a non-qualifying CCP and for unfunded contributions to a non-qualifying CCP 1. An institution shall apply the following formula to calculate the own funds requirement (Ki) for the exposures arising from its pre-funded contributions to the default fund of a non-qualifying CCP (DFi) and from unfunded contributions (UCi) to such CCP:Kic2 μ DFi UCi where c2·and μ are defined as in Article 308(3). 2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, unfunded contributions means contributions that an institution acting as a clearing member has contractually committed to provide to a CCP after the CCP has depleted its default fund to cover the losses it incurred following the default of one or more of its clearing members. 3. An institution shall calculate the risk-weighted exposure amounts for exposures arising from an institution's pre-funded contribution for the purposes of Article 92(3) as the own funds requirement (Ki) determined in accordance with paragraph 1 multiplied by 12,5.
MODIFIED +13 −15 Art. 384 Standardised method§
applies from: unchanged
Sources disagree — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. Both are shown; neither is overruled.
In the discount factor formula given for the index hedge notional amount Bind, the exponent and denominator term was changed from Miind to Mind.
Cited: Art. 384, v1 · Art. 384, v2
text before / after
02013R0575-20160719 → 02013R0575-20180101
Article 384
Standardised method
1. An institution which does not calculate the own funds requirements for CVA risk for its counterparties in accordance with Article 383 shall calculate a portfolio own funds requirements for CVA risk for each counterparty in accordance with the following formula, taking into account CVA hedges that are eligible in accordance with Article 386:K2.33 h i 0.5 wi Mi EADitotal MihedgeBi ind wind Mind Bind2 i 0.75 wi2 Mi EADitotal MihedgeBi2
where:
h
the one-year risk horizon (in units of a year); h = 1;
wi
the weight applicable to counterparty i.
Counterparty i shall be mapped to one of the six weights wi based on an external credit assessment by a nominated ECAI, as set out in Table 1. For a counterparty for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is not available:
(a) an institution using the approach in Title II, Chapter 3 shall map the internal rating of the counterparty to one of the external credit assessment;
(b) an institution using the approach in Title II, Chapter 2 shall assign wi=1,0 % to this counterparty. However, if an institution uses Article 128 to risk weight counterparty credit risk exposures to this counterparty, wi=3,0 % shall be assigned;
EADitotal
the total counterparty credit risk exposure value of counterparty i (summed across its netting sets) including the effect of collateral in accordance with the methods set out in Sections 3 to 6 of Title II, Chapter 6 as applicable to the calculation of the own funds requirements for counterparty credit risk for that counterparty. An institution using one of the methods set out in Sections 3 and 4 of Title II, Chapter 6, may use as the fully adjusted exposure value in accordance with Article 223(5).
For an institution not using the method set out in Section 6 of Title II, Chapter 6, the exposure shall be discounted by applying the following factor:1 e0.05 Mi0.05 Mi
Bi
the notional of purchased single name credit default swap hedges (summed if more than one position) referencing counterparty i and used to hedge CVA risk.
That notional amount shall be discounted by applying the following factor:1 e0.05 Mihedge0.05 Mihedge
Bind
is the full notional of one or more index credit default swap of purchased protection used to hedge CVA risk.
That notional amount shall be discounted by applying the following factor:1 e0.05 Miind0.05 Miind Mind0.05 Mind
wind
is the weight applicable to index hedges.
An institution shall determine wind by calculating a weighted average of wi that are applicable to the individual constituents of the index;
Mi
the effective maturity of the transactions with counterparty i.
For an institution using the method set out in Section 6 of Title II, Chapter 6, Mi shall be calculated in accordance with Article 162(2)(g). However, for that purpose, Mi shall not be capped at five years but at the longest contractual remaining maturity in the netting set.
For an institution not using the method set out in Section 6 of Title II, Chapter 6, Mi is the average notional weighted maturity as referred to in point (b) of Article 162(2). However, for that purpose, Mi shall not be capped at five years but at the longest contractual remaining maturity in the netting set.
Mihedge
the maturity of the hedge instrument with notional Bi (the quantities MihedgeBi are to be summed if these are several positions);
Mind
the maturity of the index hedge.
In the case of more than one index hedge position, Mind is the notional-weighted maturity.
2. Where a counterparty is included in an index on which a credit default swap used for hedging counterparty credit risk is based, the institution may subtract the notional amount attributable to that counterparty in accordance with its reference entity weight from the index CDS notional amount and treat it as a single name hedge (Bi) of the individual counterparty with maturity based on the maturity of the index.
Table 1
Credit quality step Weight wi
1 0,7 %
2 0,8 %
3 1,0 %
4 2,0 %
5 3,0 %
6 10,0 %
INSERTED +12,874 −0 Art. 473a Introduction of IFRS 9§
applies from: unknown (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose)
A new Article 473a is added, setting out a transitional regime allowing certain institutions to include a specially calculated amount in Common Equity Tier 1 capital in connection with the introduction of IFRS 9, covering how that amount is computed, adjusted, and phased in through declining factors from 2018 to 2022.
The provision also requires institutions to notify their competent authority of decisions to apply or reverse these transitional arrangements, to make related disclosures, and directs the EBA to issue guidelines on those disclosure requirements.
Cited: Art. 473a, v2
text before / after
inserted text (02013R0575-20180101)
Article 473a Introduction of IFRS 9 1. By way of derogation from Article 50 and until the end of the transitional period set out in paragraph 6 of this Article, the following may include in their Common Equity Tier 1 capital the amount calculated in accordance with this paragraph: (a) institutions that prepare their accounts in conformity with the international accounting standards adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002; (b) institutions that, pursuant to Article 24(2) of this Regulation, effect the valuation of assets and off-balance sheet items and the determination of own funds in conformity with the international accounting standards adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002; (c) institutions that effect the valuation of assets and off-balance sheet items in conformity with accounting standards under Directive 86/635/EEC and that use an expected credit loss model that is the same as the one used in international accounting standards adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002. The amount referred to in the first subparagraph shall be calculated as the sum of the following: (a) for exposures which are subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title II of Part Three, the amount (ABSA) calculated in accordance with the following formula: ABSAA2,SA A4,SA t · f where: A2,SA the amount calculated in accordance with paragraph 2; A4,SA the amount calculated in accordance with paragraph 4 based on the amounts calculated in accordance with paragraph 3; f the applicable factor laid down in paragraph 6; t increase of Common Equity Tier 1 capital that is due to tax deductibility of the amounts A2,SA and A4,SA; (b) for exposures which are subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 3 of Title II of Part Three, the amount (ABIRB) calculated in accordance with the following formula: ABIRBA2,IRB A4,IRB t · f where: A2,IRB the amount calculated in accordance with paragraph 2 adjusted in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 5; A4,IRB the amount calculated in accordance with paragraph 4 based on the amounts calculated in accordance with paragraph 3 which are adjusted in accordance with points (b) and (c) of paragraph 5; f the applicable factor laid down in paragraph 6; t increase of Common Equity Tier 1 capital that is due to tax deductibility of the amounts A2,IRB and A4,IRB. 2. Institutions shall calculate the amounts A2,SA and A2,IRB referred to, respectively, in points (a) and (b) of the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 as the greater of the amounts referred to in points (a) and (b) of this paragraph separately for their exposures which are subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title II of Part Three and for their exposures which are subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 3 of Title II of Part Three: (a) zero; (b) the amount calculated in accordance with point (i) reduced by the amount calculated in accordance with point (ii): (i) the sum of the 12-month expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.5 of IFRS 9 as set out in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 (Annex relating to IFRS 9) and the amount of the loss allowance for lifetime expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.3 of the Annex relating to IFRS 9 as of 1 January 2018 or on the date of initial application of IFRS 9; (ii) the total amount of impairment losses on financial assets classified as loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments and available-for-sale financial assets, as defined in paragraph 9 of IAS 39, other than equity instruments and units or shares in collective investment undertakings, determined in accordance with paragraphs 63, 64, 65, 67, 68 and 70 of IAS 39 as set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 as of 31 December 2017 or the day before the date of initial application of IFRS 9. 3. Institutions shall calculate the amount by which the amount referred to in point (a) exceeds the amount referred to in point (b) separately for their exposures which are subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title II of Part Three and for their exposures which are subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 3 of Title II of Part Three: (a) the sum of the 12-month expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.5 of the Annex relating to IFRS 9 and the amount of the loss allowance for lifetime expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.3 of the Annex relating to IFRS 9 excluding the loss allowance for lifetime expected credit losses for financial assets that are credit-impaired as defined in Appendix A to the Annex relating to IFRS 9 as of the reporting date; (b) the sum of the 12-month expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.5 of the Annex relating to IFRS 9 and the amount of the loss allowance for lifetime expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.3 of the Annex relating to IFRS 9 excluding the loss allowance for lifetime expected credit losses for financial assets that are credit-impaired as defined in Appendix A to the Annex relating to IFRS 9 as of 1 January 2018 or on the date of initial application of IFRS 9. 4. For exposures which are subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title II of Part Three, where the amount specified in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 3 exceeds the amount specified in point (b) of paragraph 3, institutions shall set A4,SA as equal to the difference between those amounts, otherwise they shall set A4,SA as equal to zero. For exposures which are subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 3 of Title II of Part Three, where the amount specified in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 3, after applying point (b) of paragraph 5, exceeds the amount for these exposures as specified in point (b) of paragraph 3, after applying point (c) of paragraph 5, institutions shall set A4,IRB as equal to the difference between those amounts, otherwise they shall set A4,IRB as equal to zero. 5. For exposures which are subject to risk weighting in accordance with Chapter 3 of Title II of Part Three, institutions shall apply paragraphs 2 to 4 as follows: (a) for the calculation of A2,IRB institutions shall reduce each of the amounts calculated in accordance with points (b)(i) and (ii) of paragraph 2 of this Article by the sum of expected loss amounts calculated in accordance with Article 158(5), (6) and (10) as of 31 December 2017 or the day before the date of initial application of IFRS 9. Where for the amount referred to in point (b)(i) of paragraph 2 of this Article the calculation results in a negative number, the institution shall set the value of that amount as equal to zero. Where for the amount referred to in point (b)(ii) of paragraph 2 of this Article the calculation results in a negative number, the institution shall set the value of that amount as equal to zero; (b) institutions shall replace the amount calculated in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 3 of this Article by the sum of the 12-month expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.5 of the Annex relating to IFRS 9 and the amount of the loss allowance for lifetime expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.3 of the Annex relating to IFRS 9 excluding the loss allowance for lifetime expected credit losses for financial assets that are credit-impaired, as defined in Appendix A to the Annex relating to IFRS 9, reduced by the sum of related expected loss amounts for the same exposures calculated in accordance with Article 158(5), (6) and (10) as of the reporting date. Where the calculation results in a negative number, the institution shall set the value of the amount referred to in point (a) of paragraph 3 of this Article as equal to zero; (c) institutions shall replace the amount calculated in accordance with point (b) of paragraph 3 of this Article by the sum of the 12-month expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.5 of the Annex relating to IFRS 9 and the amount of the loss allowance for lifetime expected credit losses determined in accordance with paragraph 5.5.3 of the Annex relating to IFRS 9 excluding the loss allowance for lifetime expected credit losses for financial assets that are credit-impaired, as defined in Appendix A to the Annex relating to IFRS 9, as of 1 January 2018 or on the date of initial application of IFRS 9, reduced by the sum of related expected loss amounts for the same exposures calculated in accordance with Article 158(5), (6) and (10). Where the calculation results in a negative number, the institution shall set the value of the amount referred to in point (b) of paragraph 3 of this Article as equal to zero. 6. Institutions shall apply the following factors to calculate the amounts ABSA and ABIRB referred to in points (a) and (b) of the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 respectively: (a) 0,95 during the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018; (b) 0,85 during the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019; (c) 0,7 during the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020; (d) 0,5 during the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2021; (e) 0,25 during the period from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022. Institutions whose financial year commences after 1 January 2018 but before 1 January 2019 shall adjust the dates in points (a) to (e) of the first subparagraph so that they correspond to their financial year, shall report the adjusted dates to their competent authority and shall publicly disclose them. Institutions which start to apply accounting standards as referred to in paragraph 1 on or after 1 January 2019 shall apply the relevant factors in accordance with points (b) to (e) of the first subparagraph starting with the factor corresponding to the year of the first application of those accounting standards. 7. Where an institution includes in its Common Equity Tier 1 capital an amount in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, it shall recalculate all requirements laid down in this Regulation and in Directive 2013/36/EU that use any of the following items by not taking into account the effects that the expected credit loss provisions that it included in its Common Equity Tier 1 capital have on those items: (a) the amount of deferred tax assets that is deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 capital in accordance with point (c) of Article 36(1) or risk weighted in accordance with Article 48(4); (b) the exposure value as determined in accordance with Article 111(1) whereby the specific credit risk adjustments by which the exposure value shall be reduced shall be multiplied by the following scaling factor (sf): sf1 ABSA/RASA where: ABSA the amount calculated in accordance with point (a) of the second subparagraph of paragraph 1; RASA the total amount of specific credit risk adjustments; (c) the amount of Tier 2 items calculated in accordance with point (d) of Article 62. 8. During the period set out in paragraph 6 of this Article, in addition to disclosing the information required in Part Eight, institutions that have decided to apply the transitional arrangements set out in this Article shall disclose the amounts of own funds, Common Equity Tier 1 capital and Tier 1 capital, the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio, the total capital ratio and the leverage ratio they would have in case they were not to apply this Article. 9. An institution shall decide whether to apply the arrangements set out in this Article during the transitional period and shall inform the competent authority of its decision by 1 February 2018. Where an institution has received the prior permission of the competent authority, it may reverse once, during the transitional period, its initial decision. Institutions shall publicly disclose any decision taken in accordance with this subparagraph. An institution that has decided to apply the transitional arrangements set out in this Article may decide not to apply paragraph 4 in which case it shall inform the competent authority of its decision by 1 February 2018. In such a case, the institution shall set the amount A4 referred to in paragraph 1 as equal to zero. Where an institution has received the prior permission of the competent authority, it may reverse once, during the transitional period, its initial decision. Institutions shall publicly disclose any decision taken in accordance with this subparagraph. 10. In accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, the EBA shall issue guidelines by 30 June 2018 on the disclosure requirements laid down in this Article.
MODIFIED +2,938 −0 Art. 493 Transitional provisions for large exposures§
applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)
dates added to the text: 2017-12-12, 2017-12-31, 2018-12-31, 2019-12-31
The after text adds four new paragraphs, numbered 4 through 7, that were not present before.
Paragraph 4 sets declining limits on certain exposures expressed as percentages of an institution's Tier 1 capital, running from 100% until 31 December 2018 down to 50% until 31 December 2020, and applies those limits after taking into account credit risk mitigation under Articles 399 to 403.
Paragraph 5 lists the categories of exposures to which paragraph 4 applies, paragraph 6 conditions that application on the exposure having carried a 0% risk weight under the version of Article 495(2) in force on 31 December 2017 and on having been incurred on or after 12 December 2017, and paragraph 7 exempts from Article 395(1) an exposure incurred before 12 December 2017 that carried that same 0% risk weight on 31 December 2017.
Cited: Art. 493, v2
text before / after
02013R0575-20160719 → 02013R0575-20180101
Article 493 Transitional provisions for large exposures 1. The provisions on large exposures as laid down in Articles 387 to 403 shall not apply to investment firms whose main business consists exclusively of the provision of investment services or activities in relation … 777 unchanged words … before the final registration of the mortgage in the land register, provided that the guarantee is not used as reducing the risk in calculating the risk- weighted exposure amounts; (k) assets items constituting claims on and other exposures to recognised exchanges.4. By way of derogation from Article 395(1), competent authorities may allow institutions to incur any of the exposures provided for in paragraph 5 of this Article meeting the conditions set out in paragraph 6 of this Article, up to the following limits: (a) 100 % of the institution’s Tier 1 capital until 31 December 2018; (b) 75 % of the institution’s Tier 1 capital until 31 December 2019; (c) 50 % of the institution’s Tier 1 capital until 31 December 2020. The limits referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph shall apply to exposure values after taking into account the effect of the credit risk mitigation in accordance with Articles 399 to 403. 5. The transitional arrangements set out in paragraph 4 shall apply to the following exposures: (a) asset items constituting claims on central governments, central banks, or public sector entities of Member States; (b) asset items constituting claims expressly guaranteed by central governments, central banks, or public sector entities of Member States; (c) other exposures to, or guaranteed by, central governments, central banks, or public sector entities of Member States; (d) asset items constituting claims on regional governments or local authorities of Member States treated as exposures to a central government in accordance with Article 115(2); (e) other exposures to, or guaranteed by, regional governments or local authorities of Member States treated as exposures to a central government in accordance with Article 115(2). For the purposes of points (a), (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph, the transitional arrangements set out in paragraph 4 of this Article shall apply only to asset items and other exposures to, or guaranteed by, public sector entities which are treated as exposures to a central government, a regional government or a local authority in accordance with Article 116(4). Where asset items and other exposures to, or guaranteed by, public sector entities are treated as exposures to a regional government or a local authority in accordance with Article 116(4), the transitional arrangements set out in paragraph 4 of this Article shall apply only where exposures to that regional government or local authority are treated as exposures to a central government in accordance with Article 115(2). 6. The transitional arrangements set out in paragraph 4 of this Article shall apply only where an exposure referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article meets all of the following conditions: (a) the exposure would be assigned a risk weight of 0 % in accordance with the version of Article 495(2) in force on 31 December 2017; (b) the exposure was incurred on or after 12 December 2017. 7. An exposure as referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article incurred before 12 December 2017 to which a risk weight of 0 % was assigned on 31 December 2017 in accordance with Article 495(2) shall be exempted from the application of Article 395(1).
MODIFIED +9 −33 Art. 496 Own funds requirements for covered bonds§
applies from: unknown (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date)
dates removed: 2017-12-31
Paragraph 1 no longer contains the opening time limit that had confined the competent authorities' waiver power to the period until 31 December 2017.
Aside from removing that date restriction, the wording describing the waiver and its two conditions in points (a) and (b) is unchanged, as are paragraphs 2 and 3.
Cited: Art. 496, v1 · Art. 496, v2
text before / after
02013R0575-20160719 → 02013R0575-20180101
Article 496
Own funds requirements for covered bonds
1. Until 31 December 2017, competent Competent authorities may waive in full or in part the 10 % limit for senior units issued by French Fonds Communs de Créances or by securitisation entities which are equivalent to French Fonds Communs de Créances laid down in points (d) and (f) of Article 129(1), provided that both of the following conditions are fulfilled:
(a) the securitised residential property or commercial immovable property exposures were originated by a member of the same consolidated group of which the issuer of the covered bonds is a member, or by an entity affiliated to the same central body to which the issuer of the covered bonds is affiliated, where that common group membership or affiliation shall be determined at the time the senior units are made collateral for covered bonds;
(b) a member of the same consolidated group of which the issuer of the covered bonds is a member, or an entity affiliated to the same central body to which the issuer of the covered bonds is affiliated, retains the whole first loss tranche supporting those senior units.
2. Until 31 December 2014, for the purposes of point (c) of Article 129(1), the senior unsecured exposures of institutions which qualified for a 20 % risk weight under national law before 28 June 2013 shall be considered to qualify for credit quality step 1.
3. Until 31 December 2014, for the purposes of Article 129(5), the senior unsecured exposures of institutions which qualified for a 20 % risk weight under national law before 28 June 2013shall be considered to qualify for a 20 % risk weight.
The full entry, with the citation mapping v1 = 02013R0575-20160719, v2 = 02013R0575-20180101, is committed at eu/32013R0575/CHANGELOG.md.