emendrix

Art. 19

European Market Infrastructure Regulation · 32012R0648 · every event for this act · on EUR-Lex

Opinion of the college

2 changes recorded across 2 events, newest first.

in force 2024-12-24 MODIFIED+192 −366

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/2987 32024R2987 · Regulation (EU) 2022/1671 32022R1671

applies from: unchanged

The first subparagraph of paragraph 1 no longer refers to a four-month risk assessment and report by the CCP's competent authority following a complete application under Article 17, nor to a 30-calendar-day period for the college to act on that report; instead it simply states that where the college referred to in Article 18 is required to give an opinion under the Regulation, it shall reach a joint opinion on the CCP's compliance with the Regulation's requirements.

The second subparagraph's cross-reference changed from the fourth subparagraph of Article 17(4) to point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 17(4), and it now names the college referred to in Article 18 as the body adopting the majority opinion when no joint opinion is reached.

Cited: Art. 19, v1 · Art. 19, v2

text before / after

02012R0648-2022081202012R0648-20241224

Article 19 Opinion of the college 1. Within four months of the submission of a complete application by the CCP in accordance with Article 17, the CCP’s competent authority shall conduct a risk assessment of the CCP and submit a report to the college. Within 30 calendar days of receipt, and on the basis of the findings in, that report, Where the college referred to in Article 18 is required to give an opinion pursuant to this Regulation, it shall reach a joint opinion determining whether the applicant CCP complies with all the requirements laid down in this Regulation. Without prejudice to the fourth subparagraph of Article 17(4) and 17(4), third subparagraph, point (b), if no joint opinion is reached in accordance with the second subparagraph, first subparagraph of this paragraph, the college referred to in Article 18 shall adopt a majority opinion within the same period. 1a. Where the college gives an opinion pursuant to this Regulation, at the request of any member of the college and upon adoption by a majority of the college in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article, that opinion may include, in addition to the determination of whether the CCP complies with this Regulation, recommendations aimed at addressing shortcomings in the CCP's risk management and increasing its resilience. Where the college may give an opinion, any central bank of issue, which is a member of the college pursuant to points (h) and (i) of Article 18(2), may adopt recommendations relating to the currency it issues. 2. ESMA shall facilitate the adoption of the joint opinion in accordance with its general coordination function under Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. 3. A majority opinion of the college shall be adopted on the basis of a simple majority of its members. For colleges up to and including 12 members, a maximum of two college members belonging to the same Member State shall have a vote and each voting member, shall have one vote. For colleges with more than 12 members, a maximum of three members belonging to the same Member State shall have a vote and each voting member shall have one vote. Where the ECB is a member of the college pursuant to points (c) and (h) of Article 18(2), it shall have two votes. The members of the college referred to in points (a), (ca) and (i) of Article 18(2) shall have no voting rights on the opinions of the college. 4. Without prejudice to the procedure prescribed in Article 17, the competent authority shall duly consider the opinion of the college reached in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, including any possible recommendations aimed at addressing shortcomings in the CCP's risk management and increasing its resilience. Where the CCP's competent authority does not agree with an opinion of the college, including any recommendations contained therein aimed at addressing shortcomings in the CCP's risk management procedures and increasing its resilience, its decision shall contain full reasons and an explanation of any significant deviation from that opinion or recommendations.

in force 2020-01-01 MODIFIED

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2099 32019R2099

applies from: unchanged

A new paragraph 1a is added allowing the college's opinion to include recommendations addressing shortcomings in the CCP's risk management and resilience when requested by a member and adopted by majority, and allowing a central bank of issue that is a college member under points (h) and (i) of Article 18(2) to adopt recommendations relating to the currency it issues.

Paragraph 3 is expanded to state that the ECB, where a member under points (c) and (h) of Article 18(2), has two votes, and that college members referred to in points (a), (ca) and (i) of Article 18(2) have no voting rights, replacing the prior blanket statement that ESMA alone has no voting rights.

A new paragraph 4 is added requiring the competent authority to duly consider the college's opinion, including any recommendations on risk management shortcomings and resilience, and to give full reasons and an explanation of any significant deviation when it disagrees with that opinion or its recommendations.

Cited: Art. 19, v2 · Art. 19, v1

text before / after, on the event page →